30
Dec
2003
Archives
30
Dec
2003
30
Dec
2003
28
Dec
2003
Yahoo! News - Dean Vermont Energy Group Met in Private
"Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean has demanded release of secret deliberations of Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force. But as Vermont governor, Dean had an energy task force that met in secret and angered state lawmakers..."
"Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean has demanded release of secret deliberations of Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force. But as Vermont governor, Dean had an energy task force that met in secret and angered state lawmakers..."
28
Dec
2003
New York Post Online Edition: DEMS BLAST DEAN OVER OSAMA FLAP
Page contains a great picture that shows a liberal with advanced case of Mad Liberal Disease.
Page contains a great picture that shows a liberal with advanced case of Mad Liberal Disease.
27
Dec
2003
The Clinton View of Iraq-al Qaeda Ties
I know that it looks hopeless for people with Mad Liberal Disease to read these with an open mind. They rather blabber about the stupidity of 60 percent of Americans who believe there was a tie between Saddam and Al Qaeda. They rather spew their nonsense that we are no safer after Saddam is captured.
I know that it looks hopeless for people with Mad Liberal Disease to read these with an open mind. They rather blabber about the stupidity of 60 percent of Americans who believe there was a tie between Saddam and Al Qaeda. They rather spew their nonsense that we are no safer after Saddam is captured.
27
Dec
2003
Yahoo! News - AP: Dean Blasts Bush Over Mad Cow Scare
If democrats do not to come up with a cure for Mad Liberal Disease, it will consume the Democrat Party. They need to quarantine Howard Dean.
"Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean says the Bush administration missed an opportunity to soften the impact of the country's first mad cow scare ..." ""This just shows the complete lack of foresight by the Bush administration once again," Dean said. "This is something that easily could be predicted and was predicted.""
What about the theory that this Mad Cow Scare thing was concocted over a barbecue in Texas over a year ago? Bush knew all along this was coming and he will use this as an excuse to invade another country with good cattle supply so his friends in beef industry can profit. Come on Governor Dean; don't hold back!
"As a doctor, Dean said he was more concerned about the impact of the announcement on the U.S. economy than on public health. "The truth is this is going to have a minimal health impact," he said."
Then why don't you work on getting the truth out so that this does not have such a big impact on U.S. Economy? Oh! I see... It is much more politically advantageous for you to hype the scare; try to place the blame on the administration. I wonder how you let that "the truth" thing slip out.
Read Dean's interview with the Concord Monitor where he said the following:
"I've resisted pronouncing a sentence before guilt is found... I still have this old-fashioned notion that even with people like Osama, who is very likely to be found guilty, we should do our best not to, in positions of executive power, not to prejudge jury trials. So I'm sure that is the correct sentiment of most Americans, but I do think if you're running for president, or if you are president, it's best to say that the full range of penalties should be available. But it's not so great to prejudge the judicial system."
That is what Mad Liberal Disease does to democrats.
If democrats do not to come up with a cure for Mad Liberal Disease, it will consume the Democrat Party. They need to quarantine Howard Dean.
"Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean says the Bush administration missed an opportunity to soften the impact of the country's first mad cow scare ..." ""This just shows the complete lack of foresight by the Bush administration once again," Dean said. "This is something that easily could be predicted and was predicted.""
What about the theory that this Mad Cow Scare thing was concocted over a barbecue in Texas over a year ago? Bush knew all along this was coming and he will use this as an excuse to invade another country with good cattle supply so his friends in beef industry can profit. Come on Governor Dean; don't hold back!
"As a doctor, Dean said he was more concerned about the impact of the announcement on the U.S. economy than on public health. "The truth is this is going to have a minimal health impact," he said."
Then why don't you work on getting the truth out so that this does not have such a big impact on U.S. Economy? Oh! I see... It is much more politically advantageous for you to hype the scare; try to place the blame on the administration. I wonder how you let that "the truth" thing slip out.
Read Dean's interview with the Concord Monitor where he said the following:
"I've resisted pronouncing a sentence before guilt is found... I still have this old-fashioned notion that even with people like Osama, who is very likely to be found guilty, we should do our best not to, in positions of executive power, not to prejudge jury trials. So I'm sure that is the correct sentiment of most Americans, but I do think if you're running for president, or if you are president, it's best to say that the full range of penalties should be available. But it's not so great to prejudge the judicial system."
That is what Mad Liberal Disease does to democrats.
21
Dec
2003
20
Dec
2003
ABCNEWS.com : Dean to Outline Plan for Working Families
Posted by SkipD under PoliticsAdd comment |
ABCNEWS.com : Dean to Outline Plan for Working Families
"'Our party must offer a new vision that speaks to working families working families who make just too much to qualify for assistance, but not quite enough to make ends meet,' he said." - Maybe they can not get their ends meet because they pay way too much on taxes to subsidize the other families who do qualify for assistance? Wasn't that the democrats' plan?
"Dean wants to roll back the federal tax cuts of the last few years and plans to call upon his fellow Democrats, especially those who supported the tax cuts, to promote programs to help the working poor." - It still is this democrat's plan. It is the same plan I offered back in August 2004 as an idea they can use: "Poverty Rocks: My first action in office will be to establish Department of Poverty Enhancement or DOPE. This department will be in charge of maintaining a large portion of population in official poverty levels. As long as this group votes for the democratic party, they will be maintained in poverty level, and they will be provided with free health care, education, transportation, etc... We'll make being poor a desirable thing for the masses."
"'Our party must offer a new vision that speaks to working families working families who make just too much to qualify for assistance, but not quite enough to make ends meet,' he said." - Maybe they can not get their ends meet because they pay way too much on taxes to subsidize the other families who do qualify for assistance? Wasn't that the democrats' plan?
"Dean wants to roll back the federal tax cuts of the last few years and plans to call upon his fellow Democrats, especially those who supported the tax cuts, to promote programs to help the working poor." - It still is this democrat's plan. It is the same plan I offered back in August 2004 as an idea they can use: "Poverty Rocks: My first action in office will be to establish Department of Poverty Enhancement or DOPE. This department will be in charge of maintaining a large portion of population in official poverty levels. As long as this group votes for the democratic party, they will be maintained in poverty level, and they will be provided with free health care, education, transportation, etc... We'll make being poor a desirable thing for the masses."
19
Dec
2003
14
Dec
2003
MSNBC - The Democrats' Own Quagmire
"..."At this point their positions are so convoluted, a mix of conviction and political positioning, that no one really believes them," says one political analyst. "If they were all to be injected with a truth serum, I really don't know what they would say."..."
That is exactly why they are going to lose big.
"..."At this point their positions are so convoluted, a mix of conviction and political positioning, that no one really believes them," says one political analyst. "If they were all to be injected with a truth serum, I really don't know what they would say."..."
That is exactly why they are going to lose big.
14
Dec
2003
13
Dec
2003
Boston.com / News / Politics / For Dean, 'captive' insurance a Vt. boon
Posted by SkipD under PoliticsAdd comment |
Boston.com / News / Politics / For Dean, 'captive' insurance a Vt. boon
"Howard Dean is fond of criticizing politicians who provide tax breaks to "large corporate interests," and one of his favorite campaign lines is a blast at the Bush administration for doling out tax cuts to top executives of Enron Corp.
But during Dean's 11 years as Vermont governor, he enacted tax breaks that attracted to the state a "Who's Who" of corporate America -- including Enron -- ..."
"Howard Dean is fond of criticizing politicians who provide tax breaks to "large corporate interests," and one of his favorite campaign lines is a blast at the Bush administration for doling out tax cuts to top executives of Enron Corp.
But during Dean's 11 years as Vermont governor, he enacted tax breaks that attracted to the state a "Who's Who" of corporate America -- including Enron -- ..."
13
Dec
2003
12
Dec
2003
Thinly Veiled Threats - Denis Boyles on EuroPress on National Review Online
"...The real problems associated with the rampant Islamification of the French state won't be solved by issuing a dress code: In French hospitals, Le Monde reported, female Muslim patients refuse to be examined by male doctors, and the corridors are turned into crowded prayer halls. There's a problem with overtly Muslim jurors and with Muslim defendents, who claim their trials are unfair because the judge is a Jew. Crime is rampant and the public, the media, the politicians, even the authors of the Stasi report itself all know who is responsible. The large minority of Frenchmen — although not all have citizenship — who perpetrate hate crimes against the French Republic are frequently "disaffected" Arabs, mostly from North Africa. They despise America, Jews and, unfortunately for the French, France itself..."
"...The real problems associated with the rampant Islamification of the French state won't be solved by issuing a dress code: In French hospitals, Le Monde reported, female Muslim patients refuse to be examined by male doctors, and the corridors are turned into crowded prayer halls. There's a problem with overtly Muslim jurors and with Muslim defendents, who claim their trials are unfair because the judge is a Jew. Crime is rampant and the public, the media, the politicians, even the authors of the Stasi report itself all know who is responsible. The large minority of Frenchmen — although not all have citizenship — who perpetrate hate crimes against the French Republic are frequently "disaffected" Arabs, mostly from North Africa. They despise America, Jews and, unfortunately for the French, France itself..."
12
Dec
2003
You guessed it hijab means headscarf. I don't know why all those other news organizations use the word hijab instead of headscarf. Maybe it makes it sound like some kind of religious and sacred stuff. Anyway let's just loook at this headscarf for muslim girls movement.
Here is the headline of the day:
BBC NEWS | World | Europe | Headscarf row hides deeper issues
"After 40 years or so, France's mainly north African Muslim immigrants have still not assimilated or become purely French in the way previous generations of immigrants of other creeds did, and that worries many here." Ooops! What is going on here? American liberals love French and the French are dissing multiculturalism and talking about assimilating other cultures! Well this is a side issue and we'll leave that to American liberals to come to terms with.
I wrote about this before. Some muslim girls in western countries demand that they should be allowed to wear their headscarves when they attend to schools. You know, I did not hear these kind of demands by Afghani muslim women from islamist taliban government. Oh! I remember, they were not allowed to attend schools or get any kind of education. That was part of islamic rule I thought. So what is happening here? When these islamists move to western countries, they reject all western values except having their daughters get education. That does not make sense.
"Even mainstream MPs such as Jacques Myard of the governing centre-right UMP express themselves in language which in more multicultural societies might be seen as somewhat intolerant.
"A lot of Muslim girls say that they wear the headscarf freely," he says.
"But in fact when you look at it carefully you will see that they are in some cases, in fact in most cases, motivated by religious fundamentalists and if you give them just a bit of a finger they will eat up your arm up to the elbow.
"So we have to be strict and very adamant - and say this is the way things are in France.""
Hey even the French are coming to their senses.
Look how a muslim girl explains why she wears a headscarf:
"She argues that in fact, the headscarf is a vital part of her identity - and not something which gives her second class status as a woman, as some French insist.
"From the point of view of a Muslim, the reverse is true - for us the headscarf is a symbol of liberation, because with this scarf a woman can go out and live alongside men, without regard to her sex.
"It eases the relationship between men and women. I am equal to man because of what is in my head, not because of what is on my head.""
If someone can clarify this nonsense, please feel free to do so. It brings up a great question that nobody is asking: Why are muslim women required to cover themselves?
This how CAIR answers the question:What about Muslim women?
"Under Islamic law, women have always had the right to own property, receive an education and otherwise take part in community life. Men and women are to be respected equally. The Islamic rules for modest dress apply to both women and men equally. (Men cannot expose certain parts of their bodies, wear gold or silk, etc.) If a particular society oppresses women, it does so in spite of Islam, not because of it."
Sounds reasonable? Well that is what we would expect from a propaganda machine. Let's go to the other end of the spectrum and check out the Faith Freedom International's faq:
"Do you know wherefrom the injunction of veiling in Islam come from? It comes from the fact that Muhammad in his old age accumulated a harem of a score of teenagers who where the most beautiful women around. He knew that if young men lay eyes on his gorgeous wives they would desire them. That is why he ordered them to cover themselves...."
We can always go to islamonline.net and ask about islam. Someone had already asked about hijab. If you read the complete answer by clicking on the previous link you'll find that Faith Freedom International's explanation was closer to the truth. You will also sense that a great effort has been made to show that covering of muslim women actually liberates them, not oppresses them.
Why don't we go straight to Qur'an and read a chapter about women. Here are some excerpts:
"Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice." -- Cool! So men can marry up to four women!
"Allah enjoins you concerning your children: The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females..." -- And when it comes to inheritance, one man is as good as two women?
"And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them." -- I do not know what kind of indeceny is mentioned here or what kind of a way Allah may open to those people but it sounds pretty harsh.
"Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all)." -- Any woman who wants to convert to islam, read this first.
"Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who reject Faith Fight in the cause of Evil: So fight ye against the friends of Satan: feeble indeed is the cunning of Satan." -- So all non-muslims are actually working for Satan?
Three different translations and it still is very hard to understand. No wonder there are millions of people out there who call themselves muslims who never ever read the Qur'an in their own language.
Here is the headline of the day:
BBC NEWS | World | Europe | Headscarf row hides deeper issues
"After 40 years or so, France's mainly north African Muslim immigrants have still not assimilated or become purely French in the way previous generations of immigrants of other creeds did, and that worries many here." Ooops! What is going on here? American liberals love French and the French are dissing multiculturalism and talking about assimilating other cultures! Well this is a side issue and we'll leave that to American liberals to come to terms with.
I wrote about this before. Some muslim girls in western countries demand that they should be allowed to wear their headscarves when they attend to schools. You know, I did not hear these kind of demands by Afghani muslim women from islamist taliban government. Oh! I remember, they were not allowed to attend schools or get any kind of education. That was part of islamic rule I thought. So what is happening here? When these islamists move to western countries, they reject all western values except having their daughters get education. That does not make sense.
"Even mainstream MPs such as Jacques Myard of the governing centre-right UMP express themselves in language which in more multicultural societies might be seen as somewhat intolerant.
"A lot of Muslim girls say that they wear the headscarf freely," he says.
"But in fact when you look at it carefully you will see that they are in some cases, in fact in most cases, motivated by religious fundamentalists and if you give them just a bit of a finger they will eat up your arm up to the elbow.
"So we have to be strict and very adamant - and say this is the way things are in France.""
Hey even the French are coming to their senses.
Look how a muslim girl explains why she wears a headscarf:
"She argues that in fact, the headscarf is a vital part of her identity - and not something which gives her second class status as a woman, as some French insist.
"From the point of view of a Muslim, the reverse is true - for us the headscarf is a symbol of liberation, because with this scarf a woman can go out and live alongside men, without regard to her sex.
"It eases the relationship between men and women. I am equal to man because of what is in my head, not because of what is on my head.""
If someone can clarify this nonsense, please feel free to do so. It brings up a great question that nobody is asking: Why are muslim women required to cover themselves?
This how CAIR answers the question:What about Muslim women?
"Under Islamic law, women have always had the right to own property, receive an education and otherwise take part in community life. Men and women are to be respected equally. The Islamic rules for modest dress apply to both women and men equally. (Men cannot expose certain parts of their bodies, wear gold or silk, etc.) If a particular society oppresses women, it does so in spite of Islam, not because of it."
Sounds reasonable? Well that is what we would expect from a propaganda machine. Let's go to the other end of the spectrum and check out the Faith Freedom International's faq:
"Do you know wherefrom the injunction of veiling in Islam come from? It comes from the fact that Muhammad in his old age accumulated a harem of a score of teenagers who where the most beautiful women around. He knew that if young men lay eyes on his gorgeous wives they would desire them. That is why he ordered them to cover themselves...."
We can always go to islamonline.net and ask about islam. Someone had already asked about hijab. If you read the complete answer by clicking on the previous link you'll find that Faith Freedom International's explanation was closer to the truth. You will also sense that a great effort has been made to show that covering of muslim women actually liberates them, not oppresses them.
Why don't we go straight to Qur'an and read a chapter about women. Here are some excerpts:
"Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice." -- Cool! So men can marry up to four women!
"Allah enjoins you concerning your children: The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females..." -- And when it comes to inheritance, one man is as good as two women?
"And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them." -- I do not know what kind of indeceny is mentioned here or what kind of a way Allah may open to those people but it sounds pretty harsh.
"Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all)." -- Any woman who wants to convert to islam, read this first.
"Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who reject Faith Fight in the cause of Evil: So fight ye against the friends of Satan: feeble indeed is the cunning of Satan." -- So all non-muslims are actually working for Satan?
Three different translations and it still is very hard to understand. No wonder there are millions of people out there who call themselves muslims who never ever read the Qur'an in their own language.
09
Dec
2003
Yahoo! News - U.S. Shuts Out France, Germany for Iraq Work
Posted by SkipD under General[1] Comment |
Yahoo! News - U.S. Shuts Out France, Germany for Iraq Work
"Citing national security reasons, U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz has ruled that prime contracts to rebuild Iraq will exclude firms from nations such as France and Germany that opposed the U.S. war..."
Way to go!
"Citing national security reasons, U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz has ruled that prime contracts to rebuild Iraq will exclude firms from nations such as France and Germany that opposed the U.S. war..."
Way to go!
09
Dec
2003
09
Dec
2003
09
Dec
2003
Newsday.com - Dems Criticize Bush, Omit Facts Sometimes
Posted by SkipD under PoliticsAdd comment |
Newsday.com - Dems Criticize Bush, Omit Facts Sometimes
What else is new? I used to call these people nagging nine. Since I do not watch them and I don't think anyone else watches them I'll start calling them the "Miserable Bunch".
What else is new? I used to call these people nagging nine. Since I do not watch them and I don't think anyone else watches them I'll start calling them the "Miserable Bunch".
08
Dec
2003
New York Post Online Edition: news - KERRY HIT FOR CUSS AT BUSH OVER WAR
"John Kerry saw combat up close [in Vietnam]..." That is why Kerry can use the f-word folks. According to this explanation, those other candidates who have never seen combat in Vietnam do not qualify to use the f-word when talking about Bush's policies. It is just not fair! They should have every right to use the f-word. They need to challenge Kerry on this.
"John Kerry saw combat up close [in Vietnam]..." That is why Kerry can use the f-word folks. According to this explanation, those other candidates who have never seen combat in Vietnam do not qualify to use the f-word when talking about Bush's policies. It is just not fair! They should have every right to use the f-word. They need to challenge Kerry on this.
07
Dec
2003
07
Dec
2003
FOXNews.com - FOX News Sunday w/ Chris Wallace - Transcript: Howard Dean on 'FOX News Sunday'
Speaks for itself. Well maybe not... This guy ends up explaining himself in almost every interview when he is asked about his previous comments. You can hear him say things like "...what I'm really talking about is...", "That is what I mean...", "If you actually listen to the tape..."
Some of these are pretty lame. Look how he explains this outrageous, irresponsible comment about 9-11: "The most interesting theory that I have heard so far, which is nothing more than a theory, I can't think -- it can't be proved, is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis. Now who knows what the real situation is."
"WALLACE: Do you believe that?
DEAN: ... which doesn't -- no, I don't believe that. I can't imagine the president of the United States doing that. But we don't know, and it'd be a nice thing to know.
WALLACE: I'm just curious why you would call that the most interesting theory.
DEAN: Because it's a pretty odd theory."
There are very many odd theories passed around. What about the black helicopters, what if we all exist in a virtual world while our bodies kept in cocoons by machines, what if the world is really ruled by a committee of 12, what if there are aliens among us? All those sound like pretty odd theories to me. Why doesn't Howard Dean give us his take on those? We can also come up with our own odd theories about Howard Dean. Would that be OK if other candidates were talking about some crazy, kooky things about Howard Dean?
You see it is OK for a democrat presidential candidate like John F. Kerry to use f-word to endear himself to a young and hip audience. - By the way, if you have been wondering about what the initial F. in his name stands for, it is not the f-word. - It also is OK for another democrat presidential candidate to give credence to crazy conspiracy theories to get the kook vote. It is all about getting elected folks. They will say and do anything to get elected.
Speaks for itself. Well maybe not... This guy ends up explaining himself in almost every interview when he is asked about his previous comments. You can hear him say things like "...what I'm really talking about is...", "That is what I mean...", "If you actually listen to the tape..."
Some of these are pretty lame. Look how he explains this outrageous, irresponsible comment about 9-11: "The most interesting theory that I have heard so far, which is nothing more than a theory, I can't think -- it can't be proved, is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis. Now who knows what the real situation is."
"WALLACE: Do you believe that?
DEAN: ... which doesn't -- no, I don't believe that. I can't imagine the president of the United States doing that. But we don't know, and it'd be a nice thing to know.
WALLACE: I'm just curious why you would call that the most interesting theory.
DEAN: Because it's a pretty odd theory."
There are very many odd theories passed around. What about the black helicopters, what if we all exist in a virtual world while our bodies kept in cocoons by machines, what if the world is really ruled by a committee of 12, what if there are aliens among us? All those sound like pretty odd theories to me. Why doesn't Howard Dean give us his take on those? We can also come up with our own odd theories about Howard Dean. Would that be OK if other candidates were talking about some crazy, kooky things about Howard Dean?
You see it is OK for a democrat presidential candidate like John F. Kerry to use f-word to endear himself to a young and hip audience. - By the way, if you have been wondering about what the initial F. in his name stands for, it is not the f-word. - It also is OK for another democrat presidential candidate to give credence to crazy conspiracy theories to get the kook vote. It is all about getting elected folks. They will say and do anything to get elected.
07
Dec
2003
06
Dec
2003
06
Dec
2003
John Kerry's Desperate Hours - RollingStone.com
He is so desperate that he uses the f-word: "Did I expect George Bush to fuck it up as badly as he did?"
Maybe he thinks that using f-word makes him cool in the eyes of the Rolling Stones readers. It is classic democratic candidate behaviour: Different strokes for different folks. They will say and do anything to get elected.
Read this quote: "Because this guy went to a fancy prep school and then was tapped to join Skull and Bones at Yale, he just naturally assumes the nomination is his. But in person, Kerry projects something different: He doesn't seem elitist or aloof..." Does that sound familiar? We heard the similar explanation about Gore. For some strange reason, we can not seem to see the real candidate who is supposed to be a real nice guy in person whom we should vote for you know. Since we can not meet this wonderful candidate in person we should take journalists', interviewers' word and vote for him. Even though this democratic candidate seem elitist or phoney or a zombie.
Just before he uses the f- word he says "I want to paint an optimistic, hopeful vision for the country..." I guess being a foul mouthed cool dude will help you do that Senator.
Finally here is his vision: "...so people would see the United States as not just this aggressive, arrogant force that only thinks of itself and doesn't really have a greater sense of humanity and concern." Same old nonsense. Our own national security interests are not as important as being nice to others in the world. Thank God that he does not have chance of getting elected.
He is so desperate that he uses the f-word: "Did I expect George Bush to fuck it up as badly as he did?"
Maybe he thinks that using f-word makes him cool in the eyes of the Rolling Stones readers. It is classic democratic candidate behaviour: Different strokes for different folks. They will say and do anything to get elected.
Read this quote: "Because this guy went to a fancy prep school and then was tapped to join Skull and Bones at Yale, he just naturally assumes the nomination is his. But in person, Kerry projects something different: He doesn't seem elitist or aloof..." Does that sound familiar? We heard the similar explanation about Gore. For some strange reason, we can not seem to see the real candidate who is supposed to be a real nice guy in person whom we should vote for you know. Since we can not meet this wonderful candidate in person we should take journalists', interviewers' word and vote for him. Even though this democratic candidate seem elitist or phoney or a zombie.
Just before he uses the f- word he says "I want to paint an optimistic, hopeful vision for the country..." I guess being a foul mouthed cool dude will help you do that Senator.
Finally here is his vision: "...so people would see the United States as not just this aggressive, arrogant force that only thinks of itself and doesn't really have a greater sense of humanity and concern." Same old nonsense. Our own national security interests are not as important as being nice to others in the world. Thank God that he does not have chance of getting elected.
06
Dec
2003
USATODAY.com - Conservatives want Reagan to replace FDR on U.S. dimes
Posted by SkipD under GeneralAdd comment |
USATODAY.com - Conservatives want Reagan to replace FDR on U.S. dimes
Vote in this USA Today poll on putting President Reagan on the dime before voting ends.
Vote in this USA Today poll on putting President Reagan on the dime before voting ends.
06
Dec
2003
ABCNEWS.com : Democrats Vow to Avenge 2000 Florida Loss
Posted by SkipD under PoliticsAdd comment |
ABCNEWS.com : Democrats Vow to Avenge 2000 Florida Loss
When you become irrational like the democrats are there is nothing anyone can do to help you. Nothing matters to these people. Not the Constitution, not the facts, nothing. They refuse to accept reality. They live in their make-believe world. They need a shock theraphy. Luckily it is coming. When they lose in a huge way they hopefully will come to their senses. Believe it or not, we do need democrat party leaders who are rational and reasonable. Hopefully after November 2004 defeat, democrats will be able to produce leaders as Ralph Reed described: "People want their leaders ... to talk about the future. They don't want anger and pessimism and personal attacks. They want a positive vision from leaders looking forward,"
When you become irrational like the democrats are there is nothing anyone can do to help you. Nothing matters to these people. Not the Constitution, not the facts, nothing. They refuse to accept reality. They live in their make-believe world. They need a shock theraphy. Luckily it is coming. When they lose in a huge way they hopefully will come to their senses. Believe it or not, we do need democrat party leaders who are rational and reasonable. Hopefully after November 2004 defeat, democrats will be able to produce leaders as Ralph Reed described: "People want their leaders ... to talk about the future. They don't want anger and pessimism and personal attacks. They want a positive vision from leaders looking forward,"
05
Dec
2003
Exeter News-Letter News: Clark describes bid as part of 'new patriotism'
Posted by SkipD under Politics[1] Comment |
Exeter News-Letter News: Clark describes bid as part of 'new patriotism'
John F. Kerry comes back from Vietnam and writes a book titled "The New Soldier". General Clark runs for president under "The New Patriotism" title. "The New Soldier" had a cover that showed an American Flag that is flown upside down. "The New Patriots" of General Clark would love to do the same thing.
This is a quote from General Clark: "I believe that in 2004, the president will unscrupulously use national security, patriotism and the American flag to try to crush the Democratic Party and the democratic spirit in America. I'm running because that can't happen."
Why can't the Democratic Party be for our own national security, patriotism and American Flag? Why do they care more about world rule by united nations bureaucrats, French national interests, the phony civil rights of islamists who bent on killing Americans, and United Nations flag?
Listen to this:
"Peter Smith, of Exeter, said he is specifically looking for the candidate who will best be able to beat President Bush in November 2004, and he noted that Clark has a number of strengths unusual for a Democrat.
"He brings to the table a military background, Southern connections and foreign policy expertise, all of which are areas that have been owned by Republicans," Smith said. "The Democrats will not get elected if they don't get some votes in the South." "
Good luck!
John F. Kerry comes back from Vietnam and writes a book titled "The New Soldier". General Clark runs for president under "The New Patriotism" title. "The New Soldier" had a cover that showed an American Flag that is flown upside down. "The New Patriots" of General Clark would love to do the same thing.
This is a quote from General Clark: "I believe that in 2004, the president will unscrupulously use national security, patriotism and the American flag to try to crush the Democratic Party and the democratic spirit in America. I'm running because that can't happen."
Why can't the Democratic Party be for our own national security, patriotism and American Flag? Why do they care more about world rule by united nations bureaucrats, French national interests, the phony civil rights of islamists who bent on killing Americans, and United Nations flag?
Listen to this:
"Peter Smith, of Exeter, said he is specifically looking for the candidate who will best be able to beat President Bush in November 2004, and he noted that Clark has a number of strengths unusual for a Democrat.
"He brings to the table a military background, Southern connections and foreign policy expertise, all of which are areas that have been owned by Republicans," Smith said. "The Democrats will not get elected if they don't get some votes in the South." "
Good luck!
04
Dec
2003
Northwestern Chronicle: Why not to vote for Kerry
"You've seen men like him before. He's smart, he's well-dressed, he has a pretty impressive resume. He's advocated some moderately blasphemous policies, but he has the ability to please his constituents-whoever they may be. He talks, but doesn't really pay attention what he's saying..."
"You've seen men like him before. He's smart, he's well-dressed, he has a pretty impressive resume. He's advocated some moderately blasphemous policies, but he has the ability to please his constituents-whoever they may be. He talks, but doesn't really pay attention what he's saying..."
04
Dec
2003
04
Dec
2003
04
Dec
2003
04
Dec
2003
Now he made his foreign policy statement: Making America Secure Again: Setting the Right Course for Foreign Policy. I decided to do a little web search about Senator Kerry's wisdom through the years and here are some of the results:
John Kerry to US Senate in 1971: "We are not best and brightest" & "Mystical Communism"
Troop-trashing Kerry Objects to Bush's 'Bring 'Em On' Comment
On Feb. 23, 1998, Sen. John Kerry agreed. "If there is not unfettered, unrestricted, unlimited access per the U.N. resolution for inspections, and Unscom cannot in our judgment appropriately perform its functions, then we obviously reserve the rights to press that case internationally and to do what we need to do as a nation in order to be able to enforce those rights. . . . Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East."
Read the reaction from a progressive: Dump John Kerry -- Warmonger Are you confused yet? Well, don't be. This is exactly the reason for his latest gullible speech on foreign policy. Look what kind of heat he was getting before: Kerry’s Deceptions on Iraq Threaten His Presidential Hopes
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003. From WordOne: STATEMENTS ON WMD
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
The following is from Howard Dean and John Kerry Are they for real?
Kerry joined two Republican senators, Arlen Spector (Penn.) and John McCain (Ariz.) and actually called for the CIA to launch an illegal covert action campaign--described by an unnnamed government official who spoke to the New York Times as "a major campaign of sabotage," including the bombing of power plants--against the government of Iraq (New York Times, February 26, 1998), with the avowed goal of making life in Iraq so hard that people would overthrow President Saddam Hussein.
John Kerry A Candidate in the Making is a 6 part series of the life and record of Senator John F. Kerry - The Boston Globe.
John Kerry to US Senate in 1971: "We are not best and brightest" & "Mystical Communism"
Troop-trashing Kerry Objects to Bush's 'Bring 'Em On' Comment
On Feb. 23, 1998, Sen. John Kerry agreed. "If there is not unfettered, unrestricted, unlimited access per the U.N. resolution for inspections, and Unscom cannot in our judgment appropriately perform its functions, then we obviously reserve the rights to press that case internationally and to do what we need to do as a nation in order to be able to enforce those rights. . . . Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East."
Read the reaction from a progressive: Dump John Kerry -- Warmonger Are you confused yet? Well, don't be. This is exactly the reason for his latest gullible speech on foreign policy. Look what kind of heat he was getting before: Kerry’s Deceptions on Iraq Threaten His Presidential Hopes
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003. From WordOne: STATEMENTS ON WMD
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
The following is from Howard Dean and John Kerry Are they for real?
Kerry joined two Republican senators, Arlen Spector (Penn.) and John McCain (Ariz.) and actually called for the CIA to launch an illegal covert action campaign--described by an unnnamed government official who spoke to the New York Times as "a major campaign of sabotage," including the bombing of power plants--against the government of Iraq (New York Times, February 26, 1998), with the avowed goal of making life in Iraq so hard that people would overthrow President Saddam Hussein.
John Kerry A Candidate in the Making is a 6 part series of the life and record of Senator John F. Kerry - The Boston Globe.
04
Dec
2003
Casualty balance sheet - The Washington Times: Commentary
Posted by SkipD under GeneralAdd comment |
Casualty balance sheet - The Washington Times: Commentary
"The outcome of the first reported battle since the end of major combat operations in Iraq suggests victory may be closer than most Americans dare to hope..."
"The outcome of the first reported battle since the end of major combat operations in Iraq suggests victory may be closer than most Americans dare to hope..."
04
Dec
2003
What Does Dean Have To Hide? - The Washington Dispatch - Opinion
Posted by SkipD under PoliticsAdd comment |
What Does Dean Have To Hide? - The Washington Dispatch - Opinion
"It can’t be a matter of national security. It can’t be something that would be sensitive regarding the..."
"It can’t be a matter of national security. It can’t be something that would be sensitive regarding the..."
01
Dec
2003
01
Dec
2003
01
Dec
2003
01
Dec
2003
This is from an email that is being forwarded around the net. I was not able to find the newspaper site online.
--------
Will we still be the Country of choice and still be America if we continue to make the changes forced on us by the people from other countries that came to live in America because it is the Country of Choice??????
Think about it . . .
All I have to say is, when will they do something about MY RIGHTS? I celebrate Christmas, but because it isn't celebrated by everyone, we can no longer say Merry Christmas. Now it has to be Season's Greetings. It's not Christmas vacation, it's Winter Break. Isn't it amazing how this winter break ALWAYS occurs over the Christmas holiday? We've gone so far the other way, bent over backwards to not offend anyone, that I am now being offended. But it seems that no one has a problem with that.
This says it all!
This is an editorial written by an American citizen, published in a Tampa newspaper. He did quite a job; didn't he? Read on, please!
IMMIGRANTS, NOT AMERICANS, MUST ADAPT.
I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Americans. However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the "politically correct" crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others.
I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to America. Our population is almost entirely made up of descendants of immigrants. However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here, need to understand. This idea of America being a multicultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. As Americans, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle. This culture has been developed over centuries of struggles, trials, and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.
We speak ENGLISH, not Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, learn the language!
"In God We Trust" is our national motto. This is not some Christian, right wing, political slogan. We adopted this motto because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented.
It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.
If Stars and Stripes offend you, or you don't like Uncle Sam, then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet. We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you did things where you came from. This is OUR COUNTRY, our land, and our lifestyle. Our First Amendment gives every citizen the right to express his opinion and we will allow you every opportunity to do so. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about our flag, our pledge, our national motto, or our way of life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great American freedom, THE RIGHT TO LEAVE.
------------
--------
Will we still be the Country of choice and still be America if we continue to make the changes forced on us by the people from other countries that came to live in America because it is the Country of Choice??????
Think about it . . .
All I have to say is, when will they do something about MY RIGHTS? I celebrate Christmas, but because it isn't celebrated by everyone, we can no longer say Merry Christmas. Now it has to be Season's Greetings. It's not Christmas vacation, it's Winter Break. Isn't it amazing how this winter break ALWAYS occurs over the Christmas holiday? We've gone so far the other way, bent over backwards to not offend anyone, that I am now being offended. But it seems that no one has a problem with that.
This says it all!
This is an editorial written by an American citizen, published in a Tampa newspaper. He did quite a job; didn't he? Read on, please!
IMMIGRANTS, NOT AMERICANS, MUST ADAPT.
I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Americans. However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the "politically correct" crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others.
I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to America. Our population is almost entirely made up of descendants of immigrants. However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here, need to understand. This idea of America being a multicultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. As Americans, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle. This culture has been developed over centuries of struggles, trials, and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.
We speak ENGLISH, not Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, learn the language!
"In God We Trust" is our national motto. This is not some Christian, right wing, political slogan. We adopted this motto because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented.
It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.
If Stars and Stripes offend you, or you don't like Uncle Sam, then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet. We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you did things where you came from. This is OUR COUNTRY, our land, and our lifestyle. Our First Amendment gives every citizen the right to express his opinion and we will allow you every opportunity to do so. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about our flag, our pledge, our national motto, or our way of life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great American freedom, THE RIGHT TO LEAVE.
------------
