NonStopSite

Fellow Regnery author, friend, and patriot Marc Thiessen’s new book launches today. Courting Disaster is a must-must-read that gives you an inside, in-depth look at the successful CIA interrogations program under the Bush administration and the reckless subversion of our security by the current administration and its jihadi-abetting bedfellows.

Courting Disaster: One of the most important books of the year -Michelle Malkin

We've already been attacked at least three times right here in our own country by islamist terrorists since Obama became president. Barack Obama and his administration has been a miserable failure in protecting us from terrorist attacks. All three major domestic terror attacks of 2009 were directly enabled by Obama's reverse-profiling orders.

Courting Disaster

Marc A. Thiessen. Regnery Press 2010, Hardcover, 376 pages, $16.49

Books, Islam, News, Politics Books, Islam, obama

And in this cause, every one of us -- every American, every elected official -- can do our part. Instead of giving into cynicism and division, let's move forward with the confidence and optimism and unity that defines us as a people. For now is not a time for partisanship, it's a time for citizenship -- a time to come together and work together with the seriousness of purpose that our national security demands.

This is what Barack Hussein Obama who failed miserably his "solemn responsibility to protect our nation and our people" demands.

We are not allowed to criticize the biggest intelligence and national security failure by this administration. No sir, if you say anything negative about that you are being a partisan. Get behind the incompetent Obama administration whose failure almost cost the lives of 300 people. Luckily the terrorist was almost as incompetent as this president. The guy who has not taken national security seriously, who behaved like there was no terrorism and who wanted the make nice with all the bad characters in the world because it was our fault, now wants to talk about "the seriousness of purpose that our national security demands" and claims that we are not good citizens if we criticize his failure.

Unbelievable, isn't it? This is is the same guy whose Homeland Security Department wanted to monitor patriotic American citizens because they posed a terror threat. This is the same guy who claimed Fort Hood attack by a jihadi major was not terrorism. Guess what? There is a connection with the jihadi major who killed American soldiers and the underwear bomber who attempted to kill Americans. Obama administration was not asleep at the wheel when it came to protecting the American people. They had their heads way up their asses!

Yes folks, this affirmative action president and the buffoons in his administration blamed their miserable failure to "systemic failure." "Sytemic failure" being a bureaucratic CYA to claim the whole thing failed but there was not one person in the whole administration who can be held accountable for it. Yep, it is the system's fault, let's leave the incompetent bureaucrats doing their reviews and analysis. These idiots who could not analyze the data that would have flagged the underwear bomber are supposed to be qualified to analyze what went wrong. Obama's Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano who claimed "system worked" a week ago is now singing the tunes of "system failure."

What does "systemic failure" mean?

According to the buffoons in Obama administration who are still patting their backs off for coming up with the term, it means no one person or agency is responsible and can be held accountable because our system of intelligence gathering, sharing and analyzing has inherent flaws and things sometime, as in this case, fall in the crack. Nobody dropped the ball, it just fell in a crack. But don't worry American people, the buffoons are hard at work filling the cracks so the things don't fall in them again. Absolute BS.

Here is what this "systemic failure" really means folks: Total lack of seriousness on the part of Obama administration when it comes to protecting and defending us and fighting the enemy that is islamist terrorism. They don't understand it, they don't think it is a threat, they have no clue.

Listen to what Mr. Brennan said: "Unfortunately, al Qaeda has perverted Islam, and has corrupted the concept of Islam, so that he's able to attract these individuals. But al Qaeda has the agenda of destruction and death."

I wonder why al Qaeda chose to pervert islam, not budhism, not any other religion. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

How about that Homeland Security Secretary: "We also need to look at the whole issue of what is called counter-radicalization: How do we identify someone before they become radicalized to the point where they're ready to blow themselves up with others on a plane? And how do we communicate better American values and so forth in this country but also around the globe?"

Yes folks, this is what she said: "And how do we communicate better American values and so forth in this country but also around the globe?" This clown still thinks it is our fault these terrorists want to kill us. Just like the clown at the state department who claimed that the poverty causing peace-loving muslims to blow themselves to kill Americans. Obama's state department gave the underwear bomber a visa. Michelle Malkin has a column about it:

Question: How much due diligence did the State Department consular official on the front line who interviewed Abdulmutallab actually show? Reports say it took just four days for his visa to be approved. Barely two months later, Abdulmutallab turned up in Houston for a two-week seminar at Al Maghrib Institute, a Muslim Brotherhood-tied Islamic education center that has been dubbed “Jihad U” by veteran terrorism analysts.

The "systemic failure" is in the brains of these liberal buffoons. That's what the "systemic failure" is.

Islam, News, Politics

Islamic Jihad

M. A. Khan. iUniverse.com 2009, Paperback, 388 pages, $17.24

The attacks of September 11, 2001, changed the way the world looks at Islam. And rightfully so, according to M.A. Khan, a former Muslim who left the religion after realizing that it is based on forced conversion, imperialism, and slavery: the primary demands of Jihad, commanded by the Islamic God Allah.

In this groundbreaking book, Khan demonstrates that Prophet Muhammad meticulously followed these misguided principles and established the ideal template of Islamic Jihad for his future followers to pursue, and that Muslims have been perpetuating the cardinal principles of Jihad ever since.

Find out the true nature of Islam, particularly its doctrine of Jihad, and what it means to the modern world, and also learn about

The core tenets of Islam and its history
The propagation of Islam by force and other means
Islamic propaganda
Arab-Islamic imperialism
Islamic slavery and slave-trade
And much more!
The commands of Allah are perpetual in nature, so are the actions of Prophet Muhammad. Jihad has been the way to win converts to Islam since its birth fourteen centuries ago, and it won't change anytime soon. Find out why in Islamic Jihad.

Read an Interview with the author of this book: Shaming the Muslims Out of Islam (by Telling the Truth)

Islam is an ideology with a political, economic and legal system that demands an absolute submission to its rules.

Do you wonder why liberal democRATs, leftists, islam apologists, and now the top brass of the US Army beat us on the head demanding diversity and multiculturalism from us but they don't do the same thing when it comes to muslim countries?

United States of America is the most diverse and multicultural country on the face of the world. We have people who come here from all around the world to enjoy the freedoms and opportunities not available in their own countries. People from all kinds of ethnic backgrounds, nationalities, religions been living and prospering together here in the USA for years. There is no country on the face of this earth that is more diverse, that is more welcoming different cultures yet we are the ones being accused by all these so-called elites for not being tolerant of other cultures.

Have you ever heard any of these people complaining about lack of diversity in Russia, in saudi Arabia or in Iran? How come, as AhmediniJihad claimed, there are no gays in Iran? I know, I know, they execute gays there for being gay but where are those "courageous" defenders of civil liberties and diversity protesting that? For years, islamist taliban in Afghanistan enslaved women there and our feminists can't even acknowledge that we, the U.S.A. brought freedom to the women of Afghanistan.

I asked this question before and I will ask again: We already are living in a diverse and multicultural country. Most Americans who are from different cultures are here because they want to be part of this great experience in democracy, freedom and pursuit of happiness. They want to be Americans who contribute and prosper. There is one culture that is here not to be part of America but to subvert, and destroy our culture. This is a culture that is using all the benefits, rights and liberties our democratic system provides to destroy it. Yes folks, the question is what do you do when one culture in a multicultural society is out to destroy all the others? Do you defend and protect or do you submit? It is way past time we make the decision.

The number one thing everyone should realize is that islam is not a religion as we understand religions: It is not about an individual's faith. It is an ideology not much diffrent than national socialism that is pursuing world domination. Islamist ideology is the anti-thesis of democracy and freedom. It is a 7th century ideology that is against every advancement Western Civilization made.

Don't be fooled by calls of diversity, multiculturalism and religious tolerance. These people who are making these calls go back to their mosques and chant "death to America" and believe me when I say they have no tolerance for us. They want us either dead or enslaved. You see folks, there is no such thing as diversity, multiculturalism or religious tolerance in true islam. You either submit to it or you'll get killed.

It has been six years since I wrote "Canadian Idiocy". It can no longer be explained by "idiocy." People who are trying to convince us Fort Hood was not a terror attack and islam is a religion of peace are either muslims who are working to deceive us or they are bought and paid for by muslims because even an "idiot" can see what is obvious.

Islam, Politics Islam, obama, terrorism

Do you remember the phrase "connecting the dots"? Liberal democRATs were obsessed with it after 9-11. Our Kenyan-Indonesian-muslim president seems to willfully ignore the evidence in the shooting of American soldiers by a jihadi muslim. One can effectively make the case that the shooting of an American soldier may be a new al-qeada tactic and the shooter was a terrorist not a lone crazy like the other two shooters in other incidents.

Obama’s reactions to recent violent acts

Folks, above paragraph was written not after the Fort Hood islamist terror attack. It was written back in June after another homegrown islamists terrorist, Carlos Bledsoe, killed an American soldier and wounded another.

This is what I had posted also:

Sure, it was just an isolated incident. What is this muslim's full name? "Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad". Guess what "Mujahid" means? It means "one who is waging jihad". No, no, no it is not the peaceful, internal struggle as islam apologists claim. It is the fight against the infidel. That's what jihad is and this "Mujahid" is a foot soldier of islam's war against the people who do not submit to islam. We have jihad being waged right here and our government officials kidding themselves with this BS. How many more Americans need to be killed by "mujahids" before we get serious about this threat folks?

Jihadis are killing our soldiers here in our own country

The propaganda arm of democRAT party, now state controlled media and Obama administration doing everything to make us believe that Fort Hood attack was another isolated incident of violance by a nut case.

Folks, a cursory read of the facts, attacker's background, information about his beliefs and his history proves absolutely beyond doubt that this man was inspired by his radical islamist beliefs to shoot American soldiers. the guy had a business card declaring that he was a "soldier of allah". He was openly anti American. He was'n even shy about what he believes, thinks and hopes to happen to Americans.

It is totally inexplicable that Barack Hussein Obama cannot figure out what Major Jihadi Hassan's motive was. It is totally inexplicable that propaganda arm of the democRAT party, main stream media, are trying to find excuses for a man who killed 14 people and wounded 29 others.

These are the same people who cried that we failed to "connect the dots" to prevent 9/11 attacks. Don't get me wrong, these same people, even after 9/11/2001, blamed us for the attacks and tried to find excuses for the muslim attackers even then but they were incensed that we failed to connect the dots. Folks we had direct lines right in front of our military and FBI about the Fort Hood islamist terrorist.

The dots were already connected.

Why did the Obama administration fail to protect Americans? The number one job of the President of The United States is to Protect and Defend the American people. Having been failed miserably in preventing the biggest terror attack in US soil, Obama administration is now pretending this was not a terror attack. The Obama's homeland security department wants to protect muslims after a muslim slaughtered 14 Americans. Since 1970s 3,308+ killed by Muslims in America in 65 terror attacks. Obama & Napolitano are worried about safety of the muslims. Obama's top commander in the Army is worried about diversity and actually said this: “As horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” This guy should have been fired on the spot.

I asked this question before: If you are a multiculturalist celebrating diversity and you find out the aim of one culture you celebrate is to destroy you and your culture; what do you do? We know what rational people do: Defend and protect themselves by any means possible. We also are learning that Obama and the people in his administration are either delusional or they are the agents of this other culture that wnats to destroy us. I am sorry but there is no way to explain this ant other way in light of overwhelming evidence we have.

Islam, News, Politics Fort Hood, Islam, muslim, obama, terrorism

Stratfor has a new Weekly Intelligence Report George Friedman and Reva Bhalla out titled "The U.S. Challenge in Afghanistan" which I embedded an iPaper version at the end of this post.

It is a thoughtful analysis of where we are in Iraq and Afghanistan wars but it is pushing the fallacy of "winning the hearts & minds" of people who we are trying to save.

The idea that we must win the hearts of minds of people who live in Iraq and Afghanistan or any other place we fight our external enemies is foisted upon us by our internal enemies.

I want you to think about it and try to answer the following questions:

Did Saddam Hussein win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people? He had total control of the Iraqi population. Did he maintain the kind of control he had over Iraqis by love, understanding and care?

We all know how ruthless Taliban was. Did Taliban have the "hearts and minds" of the Afghan people on their side?

Let's look at Iran. Islamist Republic is ruled by mullahs with an iron fist. We observed during the latest election that they sure don't have the "hearts and minds" of all the Iranians on their side. Do you think the mullahs are working hard to win the "hearts and minds" of the Iranians who are not happy with the regime? Does our administration care?

Let's turn back to Afghanistan Today? We are demanding that our troops should win the "hearts and minds" of the Afghans even if it means putting our troops in unnecessary danger. Now, if winning in Afghanistan is depended on winning the "hearts and minds" of Afghans, one would think Taliban would also pursue the same strategy of winning the "hearts and minds" of Afghans. Do you see them doing that?

You see, we are being fooled into losing wars by trying to win something uwinnable before winning the actual war.

Folks, there is only one thing that matters when dealing with our enemies and people who may cooperate with or harbor our enemies: POWER. These people already know we are the side with more POWER but they do not believe we have the determination, guts and will to use it. Afghans will side with us instead of Taliban when they realize that we are committed to defeat Taliban and we are not afraid to use our superior POWER to its full extent. We can't make these people love us right off the bat. First we need to demonstrate to them that we are determined to WIN the war by using everything we have in our arsenal even if it means killing Afghans who refuse to take side with us. We need to make them FEAR us first. That's all there is to it.

We need to ignore the liberals' gasps when we declare this is what we'll do because those gasps are fake!

You see folks, it is fairly obvious now that the liberal democRATs have no problem with tyrannies that oppress their own people. They even celebrate the leftist tyrants and work to prop them up and support them. Yes, liberal democRATS support tyrannies that declare the U.S. as their enemy. The only tyrants the liberal democRATs hate are the ones that are friendly to the U.S. Think about that for minute. They are making hay out of election problems in Afghanistan. Who will take over if we pull out because we are supposedly disgusted by the way these people ran their election? Will Taliban hold elections?

Folks, it is sad to see that even our own military is falling prey to this stupid fallacy of attempting to "Win The Hearts and Minds" of people before we fight and defeat our sworn enemies.

I have a proposal for the liberals:

Why don't we pull out all our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan completely and stick "FREE IRAQ" and "FREE AFGHANISTAN" stickers on the bumpers of our Humvees and tanks while the people of Iraq and Afghanistan being oppressed, murdered in mass scale by the tyrants who take over. Hey, we tried to win their "hearts and minds"! They just didn't get it...

Islam, News, Politics Afghanistan, iraq, Islam, obama, War on terror

Muslim Mafia

P. David Gaubatz. WND Books 2009, Hardcover, 448 pages, $15.46

It's the result, in part, of a six-month-long undercover operation inside the Council of American-Islamic Relations, one of the most visible and prominent Muslim lobby groups in the country. You see its representatives and spokesmen on national television. You hear them whining about anti-Muslim bias and bigotry in the U.S. You hear them talk about supposed civil liberties violations against those who do nothing but practice the Islamic faith.

What you don't hear much about is the group's associations and support for known terrorists and its relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood – the same organization that spawned al-Qaida, Islamic Jihad, Hamas and Hezbollah.

That's the story you will read in Muslim Mafia – based on years of investigative reporting, recently declassified FBI evidence and 12,000 pages of compelling internal documents gathered in the daring covert penetration of CAIR.

'Now we have proof …' - Joseph Farah WND

Our Kenyan Indonesian Muslim President has an Islam Czar who believes sharia brings justice for women. She told this to a member of an extremist islamist group that believes in the destruction of Western democracy & the creation of an Islamic state under sharia Law.

Welcome to Obamaland!

Islam, News, Politics Islam, obama, sharia

Ann Coulter's latest column has great points about Kenyan-Indonesian-muslim president's address to the muslims.

Welcome Back, Carter

Obama's "I'm OK, You're OK" speech would be hilarious, if it weren't so terrifying.

This is so true. It also applies to his speeches about others subjects. Obama says the silliest things and does the most damaging things to the United States of America.

Treason Ann Coulter 2003 Hardcover 2 Dust Jacket 1NDJ US $2.45

Slander by Ann Coulter 2002 Hardcover US $3.25

Treason by Ann Coulter Hardcover US $6.00

Guilty by Ann Coulter 2009 Hardcover US $3.49

How to Talk to a Liberal Ann Coulter2004HCDJ Politics US $2.85

Godless Ann Coulter Ann Coulter 2006 HCDJ Politics US $2.85

IF DEMOCRATS HAD BRAINS HCDJ 1ST EDIT ANN COULTER BOOK US $8.00

Treason Ann Coulter 2004Politics Government Softcover US $3.65

SLANDER BY ANN COULTER HARDCOVER US $.99

1

Books, Islam, Politics Ann Coulter, Books, Carter, obama

Chrysler executives still hoped to avoid bankruptcy. The UAW had ratified a second round of concessions that froze wages, cut retiree health care benefits and agreed not to strike the company for more than six years. All but a handful of lenders had signed off on the U.S. Treasury's offer of $2 billion to write off $6.9 billion in Chrysler loans.

Reluctantly, however, the leaders were recognizing the harsh decision Rattner made weeks earlier: Chrysler was filing for Chapter 11, no matter what.

Rattner had met with Ron Kolka, Chrysler's chief financial officer, and told him how it would go.

"We need a deal with Fiat today. We were told to pretty much take it," Kolka wrote in an e-mail to Nardelli, Vice Chairman Tom LaSorda and Robert Manzo, a financial consultant Chrysler hired in November. Rattner and his colleague Ron Bloom "will call the union in and tell them what will happen. Then they'll tell the banks, 'Here's the deal: take it or liquidate it.' "

Obama's man called shots on bankruptcy BY GREG GARDNER - Detroit Free Press

This whole thing stinks folks.

Why Fiat? I thought one reason Obama and liberal democRATs sold out Chrysler to Fiat was to force production of tiny cars here in the U.S. I thought the enviro-communists saw a great opportunity in taking over a car company. I still believe this was one of the reasons but why was Obama so eager to sell Chrysler out to Fiat? Were there other reasons?

Whose interest was President Obama serving when on March 30 he ordered Chrysler to either conclude a merger with Italian automaker Fiat within 30 days or lose federal bailout funds? That untimely announcement placed Chrysler in the untenable position of accepting whatever Fiat offered, literally cutting the legs out from under the struggling American carmaker’s negotiating platform. Some financial analysts had already determined that what Fiat was offering was a very bad deal for Chrysler. “The steal of the century,” Forbes columnist Jerry Flint wrote of the deal back in January, “Fiat gets Chrysler for next to no money, and American taxpayers must throw in $7 billion to make it happen.” By most accounts, Chrysler was in real trouble, but by announcing to the world that Chrysler had no other alternatives Obama effectively told Fiat that Chrysler would accept whatever they offered, eliminating Chrysler’s ability to cut a better deal.

Why would President Obama undercut a US company, involved in a heated negotiation, in favor of a foreign company’s interest? Clear answers are not available, but there is one very curious shareholder in Fiat that raises some interesting questions. The African nation of Libya owns at least a 2 to 3 percent stake in Fiat and thus makes Muammar Qaddafi, who controls the wealth of Libya, a direct beneficiary of the deal favoring Fiat.

Does Obama owe Qaddafi? That is a tough question to answer, but Obama’s record-shattering 700 million dollar presidential fundraising operation and a revealing speech made by Qaddafi nearly a year ago seems to undress Obama’s inexplicable sabotage of Chrysler’s negotiating position with Fiat.

Obama - Qaddafi Coincidence? by Scott Wheeler - Townhall.com

We know that Obama is paying back the unions who helped him get elected. Is he also paying back Gaddafi?

Let's go back to 1986:

Because of Libya's investment in Fiat, the Pentagon has decided not to award a proposed $7.9 million contract to the company under which it would have built 178 earthmovers for the U.S. Marine Corps. Reason: the Reagan Administration does not want any American money to flow--even indirectly--into the coffers of a government that sponsors international terrorism.

Fiat's Silent Partners - Time.com

This was back in 1986. In the year 2009, the United States has a Kenyan-Indonesian-muslim president who is paying back people who helped him fraud Americans electing him by raising $700 million during the presidential campaign. Is the terrorist Gaddafi one of his fund raisers?

Barack Hussein Obama seems to be taking Gaddafi's advice also:

Gaddafi said Obama should adopt a policy of supporting poor and weak peoples such as the Palestinians and be a friend of what he called free Arab peoples rather than U.S. "agents" in the Arab world who, he said, were hated by their own people.

"We still hope he will be proud of Africa and change America and free America of its past policy, namely with the Arabs," said Gaddafi.

Gaddafi warns Obama against "inferiority complex" - Reuters - Jun 11,2008

Islamic socialism and pan-arabism / pan-islamism... Look at Hussein's address to the muslims where he addressed the world's muslims as a monolithic group that supposedly suffered under western economic and cultural imperialism...

This whole thing stinks...

Islam, News, Politics chrysler, fiat, muslim, obama

The phony media has been ignoring the targeting and killing of American soldiers by a jihadi right here in America. The president with muslim roots made a limp statement and he is still using tax payer money to produce slick videos promoting islam. His justice department issued a statement about protecting the American muslims:

"There are those who will continue to want to divide by fear - to pit our national security against our civil liberties - but that is a false choice."

I guess the muslim civil liberties include shooting American soldiers and beheading innocents. After all it is in their religion and we have freedom of religion right? You see, according to democRATs we have to be tolerant of muslims beating or beheading their wives and daughters, muslim honor killings, muslim women being covered head to toe in some instances because it is their religion. Since their religion and their prophet also instructs them to wage jihad against the infidel, I guess we have to be tolerant of that too. I wouldn't be surprised if muslim president's justice department let this jihadi go. After all he was only following his religion.

Anyways, the right-wing bloggers who are I am sure being watched by muslim president's homeland security department are busy getting the fact about mujahid Carlos Bledsoe. You would remember my original post about him where I posed a series of questions.

Well you can get some answers here:

Memphis, Tennessee - Jihad Central? - BCR

Islam, News Islam, obama

This is unbelievable!

In advance of the speech tomorrow morning, we thought we would share with you a few stories of Muslim Americans who are proudly serving their nation in the federal government. Check out the video:

The President in the Middle East - Posted by Jesse Lee The White House Blog

I am not even going to post the video. You can also find it on YouTube.

The President Hussein with muslim roots evidently does not think there is a separation of mosque and state!

Read about the muslims featured in this slick White House production that is funded by your money:

White House Video Features Muslim Proselytizers - American Thinker

Hussein Obama, Kenyan-Indonesian muslim fraud is also working to re-make America a muslim country.

Islam, News Islam, obama, white house