President Barack Obama on Friday endorsed plans for a Muslim mosque two blocks from ground zero in New York City, declaring that "Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country."
In remarks prepared for delivery at a White House dinner celebrating the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, Obama said all Americans have the right to worship as they choose.
"That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances, Obama said. "This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable."
This is not about freedom of religion. Nobody is trying to ban the religion of islam or trying to stop muslims from worshipping. Americans were rightfully asking muslims to be sensitive. Simple as that. Don't muslims ask us all the time to respect their religious customs and traditions? Is it too much to ask muslims to respect the memories of 3000 victims who were murdered by muslims in the name of islam? I mean if you are one of those so-called moderate muslims who supposedly not agree with the supposedly radical muslims, wouldn't you find it reasonable that Americans may be offended by the sight of a mosque a stone throw away from Ground Zero? Why push this plan if you are a moderate muslim who wants to live here in peace and harmony with western civilization?
Mr. Barack Hussein who abandoned all freedom loving people now want to act like he is the champion of freedom of religion. Why doesn't he take his freedom of religion idea to Saudi Arabia or Iran? We don't need no stinking lecture about freedom of religion from muslims, Barack Hussein Obama is included. There is no freedom of religion in islam. You either submit or be enslaved by it.
Let's also not forget that islam is not a religion but an ideology that wants to impose an oppressive and backward political, economic, legal and cultural system on us. It is a sinister ideology that uses the freedoms of western democracy to take over and dismantle and destroy it. Deception is muslims number one weapon. We cannot believe anything they tell us. We need to listen to them when they are talking to each other. Here is an example: A religion of peace follower Saudi Cleric.
The islamist ideology and its political, economic, legal and cultural system is not compatible with our way of life and our civilization. We are not the ones who are limiting freedom of religion. Muslims have been murdering people for being unbelievers to their allah for centuries. So stop lying Mr. Obama! Why don't you tell the truth like you told in one of your books? You love to hear the muslim call to prayer five times a day at Ground Zero, don't you?
There is no rational explanation for Attorney General Eric Holder's refusal to acknowledge the reason that motivates islamist terrorists.
There is no excuse either.
Eric Holder must go! Well, the Obama administration must go! These people are putting us in danger.
He acts like he is hearing the phrase "radical islam" first time.
He says "there are variety of reasons" why people have taken these "acts" -- note he won't even say terrorist acts -- but he can't even get himself to include "radical islam" as one of these variety of reasons.
Why? He says he does not want to say anything negative about a religion... Well the question was about "radical islam" not islam the religion of peace. I guess the AG of the USA has respect for the religion of "radical islam." He just does not want to disrespect them... They may try to blow up New York or something?
Another thing to note here: Our AG seems to be an expert on the teachings of islam and he goes out of his way to avoid associating islam with terrorist attacks.
It makes you wonder, isn't it?
Well, I'm not done with Mr. Holder.
We also found out Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder has not read the "Arizona's Immigration Law." Yes, incredible but true! Eric Holder had no reservations about being disrespectful to the Great State of Arizona. He attacked the people of Arizona without even taking time to read and understand the law their representatives passed.
How long are we going to tolerate this incompetent Attorney General who attacks fellow American citizens, takes the side of illegal immigrants and can't face the truth about islamist terrorism?
Fellow Regnery author, friend, and patriot Marc Thiessen’s new book launches today. Courting Disaster is a must-must-read that gives you an inside, in-depth look at the successful CIA interrogations program under the Bush administration and the reckless subversion of our security by the current administration and its jihadi-abetting bedfellows.
M. A. Khan. iUniverse.com 2009, Paperback, 388 pages, $18.93
The attacks of September 11, 2001, changed the way the world looks at Islam. And rightfully so, according to M.A. Khan, a former Muslim who left the religion after realizing that it is based on forced conversion, imperialism, and slavery: the primary demands of Jihad, commanded by the Islamic God Allah.
In this groundbreaking book, Khan demonstrates that Prophet Muhammad meticulously followed these misguided principles and established the ideal template of Islamic Jihad for his future followers to pursue, and that Muslims have been perpetuating the cardinal principles of Jihad ever since.
Find out the true nature of Islam, particularly its doctrine of Jihad, and what it means to the modern world, and also learn about
The core tenets of Islam and its history
The propagation of Islam by force and other means
Islamic propaganda
Arab-Islamic imperialism
Islamic slavery and slave-trade
And much more!
The commands of Allah are perpetual in nature, so are the actions of Prophet Muhammad. Jihad has been the way to win converts to Islam since its birth fourteen centuries ago, and it won't change anytime soon. Find out why in Islamic Jihad.
Islam is an ideology with a political, economic and legal system that demands an absolute submission to its rules.
Do you wonder why liberal democRATs, leftists, islam apologists, and now the top brass of the US Army beat us on the head demanding diversity and multiculturalism from us but they don't do the same thing when it comes to muslim countries?
United States of America is the most diverse and multicultural country on the face of the world. We have people who come here from all around the world to enjoy the freedoms and opportunities not available in their own countries. People from all kinds of ethnic backgrounds, nationalities, religions been living and prospering together here in the USA for years. There is no country on the face of this earth that is more diverse, that is more welcoming different cultures yet we are the ones being accused by all these so-called elites for not being tolerant of other cultures.
Have you ever heard any of these people complaining about lack of diversity in Russia, in saudi Arabia or in Iran? How come, as AhmediniJihad claimed, there are no gays in Iran? I know, I know, they execute gays there for being gay but where are those "courageous" defenders of civil liberties and diversity protesting that? For years, islamist taliban in Afghanistan enslaved women there and our feminists can't even acknowledge that we, the U.S.A. brought freedom to the women of Afghanistan.
I asked this question before and I will ask again: We already are living in a diverse and multicultural country. Most Americans who are from different cultures are here because they want to be part of this great experience in democracy, freedom and pursuit of happiness. They want to be Americans who contribute and prosper. There is one culture that is here not to be part of America but to subvert, and destroy our culture. This is a culture that is using all the benefits, rights and liberties our democratic system provides to destroy it. Yes folks, the question is what do you do when one culture in a multicultural society is out to destroy all the others? Do you defend and protect or do you submit? It is way past time we make the decision.
The number one thing everyone should realize is that islam is not a religion as we understand religions: It is not about an individual's faith. It is an ideology not much diffrent than national socialism that is pursuing world domination. Islamist ideology is the anti-thesis of democracy and freedom. It is a 7th century ideology that is against every advancement Western Civilization made.
Don't be fooled by calls of diversity, multiculturalism and religious tolerance. These people who are making these calls go back to their mosques and chant "death to America" and believe me when I say they have no tolerance for us. They want us either dead or enslaved. You see folks, there is no such thing as diversity, multiculturalism or religious tolerance in true islam. You either submit to it or you'll get killed.
It has been six years since I wrote "Canadian Idiocy". It can no longer be explained by "idiocy." People who are trying to convince us Fort Hood was not a terror attack and islam is a religion of peace are either muslims who are working to deceive us or they are bought and paid for by muslims because even an "idiot" can see what is obvious.
Do you remember the phrase "connecting the dots"? Liberal democRATs were obsessed with it after 9-11. Our Kenyan-Indonesian-muslim president seems to willfully ignore the evidence in the shooting of American soldiers by a jihadi muslim. One can effectively make the case that the shooting of an American soldier may be a new al-qeada tactic and the shooter was a terrorist not a lone crazy like the other two shooters in other incidents.
Folks, above paragraph was written not after the Fort Hood islamist terror attack. It was written back in June after another homegrown islamists terrorist, Carlos Bledsoe, killed an American soldier and wounded another.
This is what I had posted also:
Sure, it was just an isolated incident. What is this muslim's full name? "Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad". Guess what "Mujahid" means? It means "one who is waging jihad". No, no, no it is not the peaceful, internal struggle as islam apologists claim. It is the fight against the infidel. That's what jihad is and this "Mujahid" is a foot soldier of islam's war against the people who do not submit to islam. We have jihad being waged right here and our government officials kidding themselves with this BS. How many more Americans need to be killed by "mujahids" before we get serious about this threat folks?
The propaganda arm of democRAT party, now state controlled media and Obama administration doing everything to make us believe that Fort Hood attack was another isolated incident of violance by a nut case.
Folks, a cursory read of the facts, attacker's background, information about his beliefs and his history proves absolutely beyond doubt that this man was inspired by his radical islamist beliefs to shoot American soldiers. the guy had a business card declaring that he was a "soldier of allah". He was openly anti American. He was'n even shy about what he believes, thinks and hopes to happen to Americans.
It is totally inexplicable that Barack Hussein Obama cannot figure out what Major Jihadi Hassan's motive was. It is totally inexplicable that propaganda arm of the democRAT party, main stream media, are trying to find excuses for a man who killed 14 people and wounded 29 others.
These are the same people who cried that we failed to "connect the dots" to prevent 9/11 attacks. Don't get me wrong, these same people, even after 9/11/2001, blamed us for the attacks and tried to find excuses for the muslim attackers even then but they were incensed that we failed to connect the dots. Folks we had direct lines right in front of our military and FBI about the Fort Hood islamist terrorist.
The dots were already connected.
Why did the Obama administration fail to protect Americans? The number one job of the President of The United States is to Protect and Defend the American people. Having been failed miserably in preventing the biggest terror attack in US soil, Obama administration is now pretending this was not a terror attack. The Obama's homeland security department wants to protect muslims after a muslim slaughtered 14 Americans. Since 1970s 3,308+ killed by Muslims in America in 65 terror attacks. Obama & Napolitano are worried about safety of the muslims. Obama's top commander in the Army is worried about diversity and actually said this: “As horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” This guy should have been fired on the spot.
I asked this question before: If you are a multiculturalist celebrating diversity and you find out the aim of one culture you celebrate is to destroy you and your culture; what do you do? We know what rational people do: Defend and protect themselves by any means possible. We also are learning that Obama and the people in his administration are either delusional or they are the agents of this other culture that wnats to destroy us. I am sorry but there is no way to explain this ant other way in light of overwhelming evidence we have.
Of course, not all my conversations in immigrant communities follow this easy pattern. In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example, have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging. They have been reminded that the history of immigration in this country has a dark underbelly; they need specific assurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
Simply restated as "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
Barack Obama, from his book "The Audacity of Hope"
We all know what happened at Fort Hood. A muslim army major with radical islamic views, beliefs and background started shooting US soldiers while yelling "allahu akbar" which is known as muslim terrorists' battle cry. He killed 13 Americans and wounded many others.
Barack Hussein Obama, who called a white cop "stupid" for arresting his black professor buddy without feeling the need to get more details told us not to jump to conclusions about Fort Hood attack. He did not condemn the attack, he was "frighteningly insensitive" to the victims of the attack. He preferred to stay in DC and play politics trying to pass government care with Pelosi instead of visiting the families of the victims.
Here is the latest from barack Hussein Obama:
President Obama says "we cannot fully know" what led Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan to kill 13 people and wound 38 others at Fort Hood, Texas Thursday.
Hasan reportedly shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before the killings, wrote Internet postings justifying Muslim suicide bombings, considered U.S. forces the enemy, and opposed American involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan as wars on Islam. His rampage at Ft. Hood has the markings of an act of Islamic terrorism.
But in his weekly address, Obama says, "We cannot fully know what leads a man to do such a thing." And while the killings were "heartbreaking" and "despicable" and "devastating," the president says, it is important to remember not only that Hasan's fellow soldiers responded bravely in coming to the aid of the wounded but also that "Americans of every race, faith and station" have served in the U.S. armed forces. "They are Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus and nonbelievers," Obama says. "They reflect the diversity that makes this America."
Now we know why he did not want us to jump to conclusions: He wanted to get CAIR's stand so he can spread their propaganda.
I am speechless. This was a terror attack on our soil and it happened on Obama's watch. 13 Americans killed. Even if you were arrived from Mars yesterday, with just a cursory reading of the news, even with the spin the phony jouranlists are putting, you will be able to figure out why Malik Hasan did what he did. You cannot be that stupid to claim "We cannot fully know what leads a man to do such a thing." You must be covering up especially when you know the history of islamist terrorism. Do we not know what lead muslims to fly planes to World Trade Center in 2001? Do we not know what motivated them to attack USS Cole? Do we not know what motivated the recently arrested muslim in Dallas to use his cell phone thinking it will detonate a car bomb and kill Americans? Do we really not know why this muslim major was dressed in all white -- ready to become a martyr -- in the morning of the attack?
Come on Mr. Bogus POTUS, I understand your promise to stand with the muslims but why would you insist on keeping that promise even when they kill US soldiers? You have not kept many of your other promises after all.
You can also ask other muslims if they know why this muslim attacked American soldiers:
They have a better idea than Barack Hussein Obama.
Barack Hussein Obama wants us to celebrate diversity. Phony journalists who are fearless to target so called "right-wing extremists" are wishing this guy wasn't muslim. They want us to believe that this was one of those violent acts by a nutcase who just happened to be muslim. They want us to believe an Army Major who has never seen action had post--traumatic stress disorder. As Michelle Malkin states we have to read British papers to get Ft. Hood jihadist news. I understand phony journalists' cowardice, but I have a hard time understanding why a President of the United States would be afraid of muslim terrorists... If it is not cowardice on his part to see and state the obvious then what is it? 13 Americans killed, many more wounded by a guy with a history of radical islamism who yelled the muslim terrorist battle cry while shooting Americans. Some saw warning signs ahead of US Army shooting but said nothing for fear of seeming bigoted. Yep, they were silenced by the politically correct speech. They celebrated diversity as Obama instructs us to do now. How many more Americans need to be killed before we celebrate diversity and multiculturalism?
Really folks. think about it for a minute... You are a multiculturalist who is celebrating diversity and you find out one of the cultures you are celebrating wants to eliminate you and your culture... What do you do? Do you keep celebrating or take steps to defend and preserve your culture and yourself? How can we can celebrate a backward 6th century culture and ideology that demands an absolute submission and conformity to its rules? Are we out of our minds?
Basic common sense tells me, in light of the history of islamist terrorism, this attacker's background, known beliefs and views, eyewitness accounts of the attack, this was an act of terror. It may be a one man act, but it still is an act of terror. Remember mujahid Carlos Bledsoe? What happened to that invetigation by the way?
Common sense also tells me that there is something terribly wrong with a Commander in Chief who willfully ignores an obvious threat and asks everyone to look the other way.
You see NBC Chicago asks " Who is advising him?" Forget the fact that a Commander in Chief needs no advice when responding to an apparent act of terror on US Soldiers; whoever advising him also shares his disconnect and insensitivity.
If this was a school or workplace shooting that didn't involve a muslim shooting our soldiers, you would have seen him more sensitive to the victims. If this was a story about a white cop arresting an unruly black professor, Obama would have had no need to wait to get the details of what happened. He would have denounced the vile act and called the cop "stupid".
I am not making these things up. Similar things happened. See here:
Seems like the video is disappeared from YouTube. I'll see if I can find another copy.
When I posted this video, someone commented about how irrelevant was this especially with all the "serious" stuff going around the world. I am re-posting my response here. You be the judge of how right I was:
Beware when liberals cry that we should stick with the issues and problems we face and ignore everything else. They did this when clinton abused his power and took advantage of a young intern in the white house. Why didn’t clinton deal with the issues instead of chasing skirt? He might have killed or captured Osama way before 2001 if he had done so. Now I will be accused of bringing clinton into this so let’s deal with the argument here:
1. It is not the issues but what the candidates’ proposals to solve these issues are. We already know that the GOP prefers market based solutions respectful of individual rights and freedoms. We also know that the democrats prefer government based solutions that take away individual rights and freedoms. Since no one in their own mind will vote for tyranny, democrats pretend to have moved to center in every election cycle. in the last congressional elections they ran on conservative issues only to change after elections. Obama makes different promises to sprout eatin’ liberals and gun clingin’ Americans. I wonder which promise he will keep when he gets elected?
2. The presidency is not a job that involves well-defined tasks and descriptions. The president may face issues we may have never dreamed of. It is not only what they promise to do about current issues but how they may behave when they face with an unexpected event and uncertain future. That’s why the character matters. That’s why the past experience and the wisdom gained from it matters. That’s why who they associated in past matters because they will need to bring in and work with people to solve those issues. If they have showed bad judgment picking friends and associates in the past they surely will do the same thing in the future. That’s why the little things like how a person behaves at a memorial service matter because it reveals their character, their wisdom and judgment. It tells us who this person really is. It is invaluable information especially when we just can not trust what that person is saying.
This is exactly why liberal democRATs do not want us to talk about the character, wisdom, honor, judgment of their candidates folks. They have none. All they have is empty promises that will be broken as soon as the election over.
Stratfor has a new Weekly Intelligence Report George Friedman and Reva Bhalla out titled "The U.S. Challenge in Afghanistan" which I embedded an iPaper version at the end of this post.
It is a thoughtful analysis of where we are in Iraq and Afghanistan wars but it is pushing the fallacy of "winning the hearts & minds" of people who we are trying to save.
The idea that we must win the hearts of minds of people who live in Iraq and Afghanistan or any other place we fight our external enemies is foisted upon us by our internal enemies.
I want you to think about it and try to answer the following questions:
Did Saddam Hussein win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people? He had total control of the Iraqi population. Did he maintain the kind of control he had over Iraqis by love, understanding and care?
We all know how ruthless Taliban was. Did Taliban have the "hearts and minds" of the Afghan people on their side?
Let's look at Iran. Islamist Republic is ruled by mullahs with an iron fist. We observed during the latest election that they sure don't have the "hearts and minds" of all the Iranians on their side. Do you think the mullahs are working hard to win the "hearts and minds" of the Iranians who are not happy with the regime? Does our administration care?
Let's turn back to Afghanistan Today? We are demanding that our troops should win the "hearts and minds" of the Afghans even if it means putting our troops in unnecessary danger. Now, if winning in Afghanistan is depended on winning the "hearts and minds" of Afghans, one would think Taliban would also pursue the same strategy of winning the "hearts and minds" of Afghans. Do you see them doing that?
You see, we are being fooled into losing wars by trying to win something uwinnable before winning the actual war.
Folks, there is only one thing that matters when dealing with our enemies and people who may cooperate with or harbor our enemies: POWER. These people already know we are the side with more POWER but they do not believe we have the determination, guts and will to use it. Afghans will side with us instead of Taliban when they realize that we are committed to defeat Taliban and we are not afraid to use our superior POWER to its full extent. We can't make these people love us right off the bat. First we need to demonstrate to them that we are determined to WIN the war by using everything we have in our arsenal even if it means killing Afghans who refuse to take side with us. We need to make them FEAR us first. That's all there is to it.
We need to ignore the liberals' gasps when we declare this is what we'll do because those gasps are fake!
You see folks, it is fairly obvious now that the liberal democRATs have no problem with tyrannies that oppress their own people. They even celebrate the leftist tyrants and work to prop them up and support them. Yes, liberal democRATS support tyrannies that declare the U.S. as their enemy. The only tyrants the liberal democRATs hate are the ones that are friendly to the U.S. Think about that for minute. They are making hay out of election problems in Afghanistan. Who will take over if we pull out because we are supposedly disgusted by the way these people ran their election? Will Taliban hold elections?
Folks, it is sad to see that even our own military is falling prey to this stupid fallacy of attempting to "Win The Hearts and Minds" of people before we fight and defeat our sworn enemies.
I have a proposal for the liberals:
Why don't we pull out all our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan completely and stick "FREE IRAQ" and "FREE AFGHANISTAN" stickers on the bumpers of our Humvees and tanks while the people of Iraq and Afghanistan being oppressed, murdered in mass scale by the tyrants who take over. Hey, we tried to win their "hearts and minds"! They just didn't get it...
P. David Gaubatz. WND Books 2009, Hardcover, 448 pages, $13.96
It's the result, in part, of a six-month-long undercover operation inside the Council of American-Islamic Relations, one of the most visible and prominent Muslim lobby groups in the country. You see its representatives and spokesmen on national television. You hear them whining about anti-Muslim bias and bigotry in the U.S. You hear them talk about supposed civil liberties violations against those who do nothing but practice the Islamic faith.
What you don't hear much about is the group's associations and support for known terrorists and its relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood – the same organization that spawned al-Qaida, Islamic Jihad, Hamas and Hezbollah.
That's the story you will read in Muslim Mafia – based on years of investigative reporting, recently declassified FBI evidence and 12,000 pages of compelling internal documents gathered in the daring covert penetration of CAIR.
Our Kenyan Indonesian Muslim President has an Islam Czar who believes sharia brings justice for women. She told this to a member of an extremist islamist group that believes in the destruction of Western democracy & the creation of an Islamic state under sharia Law.
I did write about Ghaddafi - Fiat connection and how it might have played a role in Obama's selling out and American company to Italians for exactly nothing.
Jerome Corsi has an article about how Obama-Odinga connection may be affecting Obama's reaction to Iran elections. Guess who else's name appears in the article?
If Obama intends to pursue direct negotiations with the Ahmadinejad government should the post-election violence fail to produce a new election, the administration may well be advised to contemplate how as series of photographs of Obama-supporting Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga and President Ahmadinejad together might impact freedom fighters in Iran as well as the American public.
...
WND has also reported that Obama, with a donation of nearly $1 million, and a son of Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi were among the biggest contributors to Odinga's 2007 presidential campaign, according to an internal document obtained by WND in Kenya.
WND has further reported that Odinga, prior to the 2007 election, concluded a written agreement with Muslim leaders stipulating that if they delivered him the Muslim vote, he would in turn, once elected, change the constitution to declare Islamic law as the ruling authority in Muslim-dominated regions.
