Archive

Posts Tagged ‘phony media’

This is How You Deal With Propagandists in Liberal Media

January 29th, 2010

This is exactly the way the Republicans should deal with brain-dead phony media members.

Do not answer their questions that are based on liberal democRAT horseshit. Question their assumptions. Expose their dishonesty and propaganda. make fun of their sheer idiocy. Only the idiots like these two would repeat stupid liberal propaganda mindlessly.

Kudos to Senator Gregg!

Sphere: Related Content

News, Politics

MRC Exposes Phony Media

January 26th, 2010

Do we have a bogus POTUS?

October 19th, 2009

Really folks, who is Barack Hussein Obama?

We have a guy who is holding the highest office in the land and we know nothing about him. We have the phony media and the phony journalists to thank for this.

Listen to this:

What most people know is that the Associated Press (AP) is one of the largest, internationally recognized, syndicated news services. What most people don’t know that is in 2004, the AP was a “birther” news organization.

How so? Because in a syndicated report, published Sunday, June 27, 2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, and which was, as of this report, available at

http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

The AP reporter stated the following:

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.


Wait a minute- Obama is “Kenyan-born”?

So back in 2004, the AP knew that Obama was either Kenyan-born or he was actively promoting himself to be Kenyan-born to get elected to the senate. How is it that they are making fun of people who are asking legitimately whether or not we have a "bogus president" Today?

The difficulty in finding this gem of a story is hampered by Google, which is running flak for Obama: because if you search for “Kenyan-born US Senate” you wont find it, but if you search for the phrase without quotes you will find links which talk about it.

I've always thought Google is a monopoly when it comes to web search. The company whose motto is "Do no evil" seems to be not living up to its motto.

A Chronology of Deceit

One can now ask an important question which has not yet been emphasized enough: “Just when did Obama begin to publically claim he was born in Hawaii?” This question is distinct from the question, “Just where in fact was Obama born?”, and from the other question, “What do official documents say about where he was born?”

So we have a bogus POTUS who is an expert in deceiving voters...

Remember how his middle name "Hussein" was off-limits during the campaign and now celebrated for the appeal it has for muslims around the world.

Remember how we were not allowed to ask whether or not Obama is a muslim and how he declared the U.S. to be the largest muslim country after the election.

Remember how he was celebrated as a "constitutional scholar" and even Helen Thomas believed it just to be corrected by Robert Gibbs when questioned.

The journalism in this country is dead. We have partisan propagandists who pass themselves as legitimate journalists.

Sphere: Related Content

News, Politics ,

Obama fights the imaginary enemy

October 8th, 2009

There was never a single moment when White House staff decided the major media outlets were falling down on the job. There were instead several such moments.


Calling 'Em Out: The White House Takes on the Press
By Michael Scherer

Wow! I am speechless... the major media outlets have been falling down on the job? What job? The job of propagandizing for the dear leader Obama? They are doing a marvelous job of it.

This is surreal folks. It is 1984... It definitely is.

Barack Hussein Obama is attacking the major media outlets? The same media outlets that did not bother to ask questions about his inexperience. The same media that admitted not knowing anything about Barack Hussein obama but refused to do any investigative work. The same media that ignore many questions about his background, his education, his friends and connections. The same media that are tirelessly producing polls to show Barack Hussein Obama and his agenda are supported by the American people. The same media that are cheering the "good" economic news that we have less people applying for unemployment every month while more than half a million Americans are losing their jobs each and every month. The same media that are writing ridiculous stories about the benefits of economic meltdown. The same media that are trying to make everything their dear leader does look good. The same media that volunteer to be the vicious attack dogs for Barack Hussein Obama, even when the target is the general who is in charge of the war in Afghanistan. On and on and on.

Didn't the dear leader Barack Hussein Obama watch the coverage of his and his wife's olympic bid? Phony journalist women were having orgasms live talking about how he and his wife wowed the IOC. They were so confident that the messiah was going to deliver the olympics to his hometown to make his cronies rich, they were shocked and stunned to hear the actual result. The idiot CNN anchor could not believe what he was hearing. He kept saying "but, but...". Yeah, the messiah failed and he was stunned. These idiots are so invested in their idiot leader that they threw common sense and critical thinking out the window. How else can you explain their praise of Michelle Obama's lame me, me me speech?

Now the dear leader is calling them out? What the hell you want the media to do Obama? Wipe your ass? Well, they already are doing that.

Well, you know what, we are sick of your whining, narcissism and, insecurity! We have young men and women fighting a war in Afghanistan. You declared that the war in Afghanistan was important and in March you declared your "comprehensive new strategy" after "careful review" and chose a general to fight the war who gave his assessment and his request for additional troops to WIN the war more than a month ago. These men and women who are risking their lives each and everyday are not whining while you are ignoring their request for help. You are ordering your attack dogs to attack the general while whining about the media coverage you are getting. You are a LOSER. We do not want a LOSER as our President. I just can't believe how American people voted for you. I just can't get myself to believe a majority of American people turned into losers like the ones in Detroit who lined up to get "free"money from you.

It is easy to attack your imaginary enemies Mr. Obama. What the hell are you going to do about the real enemies? We are still waiting...

loser

Sphere: Related Content

News, Politics

Phony Journalist Fails

October 2nd, 2009

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Barack Hussein Obama made a fool of himself. He failed to bring Olympics to his hometown to help his cronies get rich.

Listen to the arrogant phony journalist right before the IOC vote.

Sure, Rock Star Obamas were absolutely magnificient... Thanks to Obamas, Chicago will win!

This is just one example folks.

How could these people be so wrong?

Well, just wait till the elections... Heh heh heh...

Sphere: Related Content

News, Politics , , ,

Phony Media’s Take on Van Jones Scandal

September 8th, 2009

On September 4, 2009 at 11:30 AM EDT Byron York posted this:

Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the New York Times: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the Washington Post: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on NBC Nightly News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on ABC World News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CBS Evening News: 0.

The Van Jones (non) feeding frenzy

Keep in mind that the blogosphere was buzzing with Obama's Green Czar's past which led to his resignation.

This guy was one of the biggest leftist kooks we have ever seen and he was in the White House advising the POTUS.

We all know what would happened if Bush had a close adviser with half the kooky past this guy has.

Now let's turn to the reaction of our media icons to this Van Jones story... Tom Brokaw and Thomas Friedman, two media icons, trusted journalists had these to say on Meet The Press:

MR. BROKAW: Well, I've--one of the things I've been saying to audiences is this question comes up a lot, and a lot of people will repeat back to me and take it as face value something that they read on the Internet. And my line to them is you have to vet information. You have to test it the same way you do when you buy an automobile or when you go and buy a new flat-screen television. You read the Consumer Reports, you have an idea of what it's worth and what the lasting value of it is. You have to do the same thing with information because there is so much disinformation out there that it's frightening, frankly, in a free society that depends on information to make informed decisions. And this is across the board, by the way. It's not just one side of the political spectrum or the other. It is across the board, David, and it's something that we all have to address and it requires society and political and cultural leaders to stand up and say, "this is crazy." We just can't function that way.

MR. FRIEDMAN: You know, David, I just want to say one thing to pick up on Tom's point, which is the Internet is an open sewer of untreated, unfiltered information, left, right, center, up, down, and requires that kind of filtering by anyone. And I always felt, you know, when modems first came out, when that was how we got connected to the Internet, that every modem sold in America should actually come with a warning from the surgeon general that would have said, "judgment not included," OK? That you have to upload the old-fashioned way. Church, synagogue, temple, mosque, teachers, schools, you know. And too often now people say, and we've all heard it, "But I read it on the Internet," as if that solves the bar bet, you know? And I'm afraid not.

These are the sad excuses for journalists in our country. Like Rush has been saying, Obama is their Waterloo.

Tom Brokaw advises us to vet information we get from internet because there is so much disinformation out there. Yeah we should trust the investigative news reports like Dan Rather's fabrications about Bush's service in the National Guard. Sure the Holy News Media should be the ultimate arbitrator of what we hear and see. What was to be vetted in the Van Jones scandal Mr. Brokaw? We were able to read, watch and hear what the guy himself had said. It wasn't fabricated documents. You guys making fun of birthers every chance you get but you are silent when it comes to the 9-11 truthers. Why? What part of the information about Van Jones you guys did not report was disinformation? Why did he resign if it all was made-up? Why didn't Obama the Messiah intervened and saved him from all these baseless attacks?

Thomas Friedman calls internet the "open sewer of untreated, unfiltered information". Forget about the fact that this guy works for a newspaper that belongs in the sewer, focus on what they are trying to say: Don't trust the news and information you find on the internet. Trust us the media. These people would be enthusiastic supporters of any regulation or censorship of online blogs. Don't be surprised folks.

Tom Brokaw, respected phony journalist says: "You have to test it the same way you do when you buy an automobile or when you go and buy a new flat-screen television. You read the Consumer Reports, you have an idea of what it's worth and what the lasting value of it is..." Where do most people go to do research before they buy a car or any other big ticket item? Internet of course! Well, it is pretty clear Mr. Brokaw is not concerned about disinformation that exists online about buying a car or a flat-screen television but he'd like to have the political news and views available online either restricted, regulated or at the least mistrusted. Why? Because this dinosaur of the old propagandist media wants to hold the monopoly in news and views dissemination. Tom Brokaw and Thomas Friedman, like many of their colleagues in the phony media, want the power to control what news and views reaches to us dumb folk so we don't get no wrong ideas.

Thanks but no thanks...

Sphere: Related Content

News, Politics ,

ObamaCare Newsspeak

August 25th, 2009

This is what happens when tyranny starts taking root by taking control of the media:

More than 50 percent of Americans believe a public insurance option will increase health care costs, according to a new survey on assertions the White House has called myths.

Majority of Americans Believe Health Care Reform 'Myths'

This is repulsive enough to turn my stomach.

According to this so-called "news article", if the White House (Dear Leader Hussein) calls somrthing a "myth" then it is a myth without question and the Americans who believe it are to be made fun of.

Unbelievable but this is happening in the United States of America in 2009!

So what are these supposed myths?

"67 percent of respondents believe that wait times for health care services, such as surgery, will increase"

Only 67 percent of these respondents have common sense to see the obvious? Simple logic, and looking at the experience of other countries with government-run health care demands that 100 percent of people should believe this "myth".

"About five out of 10 believe the federal government will become directly involved in making personal health care decisions"

Hello! Some people associated with Obama and liberal democRATs wrote a 1000 plus page bill that will be expanded into thousands more pages of rules and regulations once it becomes law. That's not being directly involved?

"Roughly six out of 10 Americans believe taxpayers will be required to pay for abortions'

It is in the bill!

Who the hell is writing this article anyways? Instead of taking the White House's claims at their face value, can s/he just check them first by reading the bill?

There is more of these TRUTHS about ObamaCare what Obama calls MYTHS and the phony media repeats.

I am not going to continue quoting from this JUNK! It is JUNK!

Welcome to Obamaland folks!


Animal Farm and 1984

Christopher Hitchens (Introduction). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 2003, Hardcover, 400 pages, $13.84

Sphere: Related Content

News , ,

Media’s Blackout on muslim violence

June 11th, 2009

CAMPBELL BROWN, CNN ANCHOR: (voice-over): Here are the questions we want answered. Are homegrown terrorists more dangerous than al Qaeda? Tonight, chaos in the heart of the capital, breaking news on the deadly shooting at Washington's Holocaust Museum.

Guard Shot and Killed at Holocaust Museum; Too Tolerant of Hate?

Wow! Phony journalist Campbell Brown is all riled up about "homegrown terrorist" 88-year-old white supremacist. She even claims that a lone loony gunman is more dangerous than a worldwide islamist terror organization that is seeking to kill Americans in a mass scale.

Well, you know what, I probably would have no problem with her hysterics if she and the rest of the phony media was equally hysterical about a homegrown alqaeda jihadi who killed an American Soldier right here in America. I would have understood their concerns about gun violence if they had shown a little bit curiosity about how this jihadi got his weapons. Have you heard about the Pakistan hotel bombing? Not from the phony media...

Armed men entered the Pearl Continental hotel in the northwestern city on Tuesday, firing at security personnel before detonating explosives, government and security officials said.

It is pretty similar to Mumbai attack. Is it possible homegrown jihadis to mount a similar attack here?

Why is the media blocking out muslim terror attacks? CBSNews.com has stories about the Arkansas shooter merely repeating what the authorities saying happened without any interpretation or investigation into the shooter's motive, background and religion. It also has stories about the museum shooter expanding upon his background and drawing conclusions about a wider threat by hate groups. There is no such conclusion drawn from the muslim jihadi shooting and how the hatred spewed by him may also be at the base of a wider threat. Why is there a different treatment? Do the muslims enjoy affirmative action when it comes to hatred and violence towards Americans? Do the media elites think the muslims are justified in their hatred and violence?

Why is the rush in claiming there was no terrorism involved in Air France crash?

Two passengers with names linked to Islamic terrorism were on the Air France flight which crashed with the loss of 228 lives, it has emerged.

Terror Names Linked To Doomed Flight AF 447

Why is this not being reported?

I am just trying to understand what is going on here folks... Is it because the media does not want their new god-like president look bad? They used to trumpet any act of violence in Iraq. Terrorists still blowing up cars over there and the media ignores them now. Since their god-like president wasn't able to stop the muslim hatred and violence, they probably think that they can create an illusion of peace and harmony by not reporting the war...

Obama certainly created a bizarre world...

Sphere: Related Content

News

Ann Curry wearing hijab – Shame!

June 6th, 2009

Ann Curry

Why Ann Curry, an American journalist, is covering her head?

Not to offend the sensibilities of Iranian muslims who think women are inferior sex and should cover their heads so that the muslim men don't get horny? Is that why?

Why doesn't Ann Curry find the muslims' treatment of women offensive and refuse to talk to them?

Why do we have to be sensible to the demands of a backward culture that treats females as second class citizens?

Why don't we get offended when we see muslim women in America forced to wear head scarves, even burqas?

Guess what? I did not know this until the POTUS with muslim roots said it:

That's why the United States government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it.

Unbelievable isn't it? Forget being offended and helping muslim women escape the enslavement, our government actually facilitates it.

Now, I wrote about this hijab deception before: Here and here. You see folks muslims who are living all over the western countries demand that their daughters, sisters, wives be allowed to wear hijab at school and at work. They claim that the governments or schools or employees who ban hijab are taking their freedom of religion away.

Let me ask you this: Are you aware of any muslim females going to school in Afghanistan when Taliban, a true islamist government, ruled? Even now, islamists in Afghanistan and Pakistan are attacking little girls at schools. You see folks, the inferior sex in islam is under total control of males and there is no need for females to be schooled. Heck, most islamist countries do not allow women to work anyways so what's the point in educating females? So the question is why muslims who live in western countries are so eager to provide their daughters, sisters and wives with education in infidel's schools? Really folks, think about it... Well, it is all part of the deception to get western civilization to accept their barbaric ways in the name of "religious freedom" which is a western idea that has no meaning in islam. There is no religious freedom in islam folks. You either submit to it and convert or live as an inferior class citizen or worse they maim and kill you.

We cannot demand that the muslims who choose to live in a modern western civilized society drop their backward ways and become civilized citizens or go back and live in their own islamic hell-holes but the iranian mullahs demand a female American TV personality wear a hijab and she happily submits. No wonder I call these people "phony journalists."

She is not the only one. Who can forget Speaker Pelosi in her muslim attire?

Don't you find it offensive that these are feminists and they don't see any problem with islam's treatment of women? By agreeing to the demands of mullahs that they should cover their heads, aren't they accepting islam's view and treatment of women? The feminists in this country are silent about honor killings, genital mutilations. They either don't give a damn about women who are abused and oppressed by islam or they are afraid of islam.

What about Barack Hussein Obama who is fighting to keep muslim women in America under wraps in the name of religious freedom?

The bottom-line is being afraid of islamists and keep giving into the barbarians will only get us certain enslavement and death. If we want to keep our lives and civilization, we have to fight back! The first step is to drop this stupid multiculturalism and diversity bullshit and be proud of who we are and what we have accomplished. Our culture, our western civilization is light years ahead of islamist culture of dark ages and it is supremely better than islamist ideology. We do not need to show respect to barbarians but we have to do everything we can to help innocent people who are suffering under islamist tyranny and lift them up to 21st century. It starts with courage! Ann Curry should have the courage to say to the mullahs that she will only do her interview as an American woman dressed the way a woman in a civilized western society dresses. What do you think the iranian women who have aspirations of becoming like western women thought when they see this western journalist dressed as the islamist mullahs required them?

Sphere: Related Content

Islam, News , ,

Muslims Kill Young Woman, Man for Eloping

April 14th, 2009

Muslims Kill Young Woman, Man for Eloping

This should be the headline of the AP story that is titled

Afghan Taliban kill young woman, man for eloping

Funny thing is you can't even find the word "islam" or "muslim" anywhere in the story. The Taliban is described as "conservative". Sure the Taliban was motivated by their "conservative" ideology...

Believe it or not, muslim clerics who are following islamic shariah law to execute two young lovers are described as "conservative clerics". The Taliban that lives by islamic shariah law is described as "the conservative Taliban." Again there is no mention of "islam" or "muslim' in the story.

You see folks "conservatism" is bad! I don't need to spell out why the AP used the word "conservative" instead of well, "fanatic islamists", "muslim', "islamofascists" which will better describe the Taliban.

Why do you think these phony journalists can't tell the truth when it involves islam but they have no concern in disparaging conservatism? It is easy folks: They are cowards. They know the "religion of peace" believers will attempt to kill or blow up the phony journalists.

Afghan Taliban kill young woman, man for eloping - By AMIR SHAH, Associated Press Writer

Taliban gunmen used a firing squad to kill a young couple in southern Afghanistan for trying to elope, shooting them with rifles in front of a crowd in a lawless, militant-controlled region, officials said Tuesday.

The woman, 19, and the man, 21, were accused by the militants of immoral acts, and a council of conservative clerics decided that the two should be killed,

Yep the "conservative' clerics decided that two lovers should be killed.

What a shame this story is. Folks this is the shariah law these same journalists write stories praising it. The same kind of thing happens all over the islamic countries not only in "conservative" Afghanistan. It is Islam the "Religion of Peace" and muslim clerics who decided to kill these people.

Shame on AP and shame on cowardly phony journalists.

Sphere: Related Content

Islam, News ,