nonstopsite

NonStopSite.com domain name is for sale:

$75,000.00


Click here to contact SkipD.

Note: SkipD is not the owner of this domain but the editor of the blog.

Owner of the domain name decided to put nonstopsite.com on the shopping block.

It is a GREAT domain name. It is suitable for any dynamic, web 2.0 site. Possibilities are limitless.

I have been blogging here at NonStopSite.com for over five years.

Back in June 2003, I had this itch about putting up a fight against the lies, misinformation and outright propaganda spread by the communist, socialist, leftist elites in this country. It only takes good old common sense to how brain-dead these so-called smart leftist intellectuals and their ideas are.

Blogging was the way to do it and a friend of mine helped me set this site up using NucleusCMS platform. It has been great but it is time to make a few changes now...

I will be moving the blog under blog directory. It will be powered by WordPress. My old posts will stay where they are since there is no easy way to import them to WordPress, I am told.

What prompted this change is my desire to have others get involved actively in fighting the leftists in this great country. So the BIG NEWS is... that you will be able to participate not only by commenting on posts but by posting articles. Join the fight against propaganda!

"The headline may seem like a trick question -- even a dangerous one -- to ask during an election year"

Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals? - Examiner.com

So another research into obvious uncovers -- surprise, surprise -- the obvious.

So the liberals think it is OK to cheat on taxes. They would participate in schemes to cheat government of taxes and benefit payments. They would buy goods that they know are stolen. They would shoplift, lie and illegally download music.

"A study in the Journal of Business Ethics involving 392 college students found that stronger beliefs toward “conservatism” translated into “higher levels of ethical values.” And academics concluded in the Journal of Psychology that there was a link between “political liberalism” and “lying in your own self-interest,” based on a study involving 156 adults."

If you have been reading this blog then you know that I tie every liberal idea, policy or scheme to their self-interests. That's why I even proposed that they should be called liberal weasels and the democrat party should change it is icon to a weasel.

"Liberals were more willing to “let others take the blame” for their own ethical lapses, “copy a published article” and pass it off as their own, and were more accepting of “cheating on an exam,” according to still another study in the Journal of Business Ethics."

Anyways, we all know that liberals are liers and cheaters. They are dishonest and untrustworthy. But why?

"The honesty gap is also not a result of “bad people” becoming liberals and “good people” becoming conservatives. In my mind, a more likely explanation is bad ideas. Modern liberalism is infused with idea that truth is relative. Surveys consistently show this. And if truth is relative, it also must follow that honesty is subjective.

Sixties organizer Saul Alinsky, who both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton say inspired and influenced them, once said the effective political advocate “doesn’t have a fixed truth; truth to him is relative and changing, everything to him is relative and changing. He is a political relativist.”

During this political season, honesty is often in short supply. But at least we can improve things by accepting the idea that truth and honesty exist. As the late scholar Sidney Hook put it, “the easiest rationalization for the refusal to seek the truth is the denial that truth exists.”"

Again, why do liberals deny that truth exists. Why do they lie and cheat? It is the ideology that is based on self-interest that does not value anything but self-interest folks. Once you commit to that ideology you will say and do anything. You will justify pretty much anything including mass-murder or genocide. Sounds way over the top? Don't doubt me folks. That's why from time to time I wrote about the similarities liberal democRATs have with communists, tyrannies and even with terrorists. You can never ever TRUST them. Their word doesn't mean anything. Never forget that liberal democRATs will sell you on a heart-beat if it advances their self-serving agenda.

» Read More

This morning one of the local FM Station DJs or the guy who reads the pop-culture news reported that Hillary Clinton won West Virginia primary but no surprises there since "60% of the population is white working class hicks". He wrapped his news segment with "214 days of Bush in Office left".

It is pretty obvious that this guy is a liberal democrat. What he said is also pretty revealing as to what kind of people these liberal democrats are: They are the real racists in this country. They are the most brain-dead people. They are only able to think in cliches and slogans. Yet they always claim to be the smartest, the most intelligent, the most caring people ever.

I guarantee you that most liberal democrats in this country share his feelings that white democrats who do not vote for a black man are racists. They do look down on the working class people while pretending to care about them so they can get their votes. Truthfully, the "racist" part on this post's title is misleading. It gives the impression that there are some liberal democrats who are not racists which is not true.

""You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years. ... And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."'

Obama says some voters are angry, bitter - Yahoo! News

I love the headline. Phony media is trying to cover for Barack Hussein Obama. Spinning for him. headline should be "Obama says most Americans are small-minded bigots, gun-toting religious angry nuts because they are ignorant and stupid."

Here is the deal: This year we do not need the naked libRAT. We call her "naked libRAT" because unlike all liberal democRATs who need to lie to cover what they really think so they can deceive us to get our votes, naked libRAT does not lie and shines a light into the dark hearts of these liberal democRATs. This year, thanks to the Obama - Clinton race libRATs all over are revealing what truly they think.

We already know that these libRATs think not much of us regular folks. They resent the fact that they have to try to get our votes. That's why they have never met a dictator they did not like.

Read Barack Hussein Obama's words. Skip the God and the Guns part. We already know they hate them both. The part about the "anti-trade sentiment" is revealing though. Obama, just like Clinton and all the other libRATs is supposedly anti-trade so why did he say that? The truth is that he is anti-trade now to get the endorsement of union bosses and the votes of unions. That's all. It's all about getting votes to get the power. He is just playing the game. He is anti-trade now so he can get the votes of these ignorant folks who are bitter, who cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them...

If you have been reading this blog, if you have beeen studying libRATs as I have been, you wouldn't be surprised at all. Obama Hussein whatever is as elitist as John Kerry, Billary Clinton, Pelosi and all the other libRATs. They all are arrogant, condescending people. That's why each and every policy proposal they come up with is about limiting our freedoms. They think they know how to run our lives better than we do.

I have no doubt in my mind Obama Hussein agrees with his pastor and his wife that there is nothing to be proud of America. He probably would join his pastor by repeating his mantra "God Damn America". But hey he still wants us angry and ignorant Americans' votes so he will lie about his true beliefs.

"But Wright was a former Muslim and black nationalist who had studied at Howard and Chicago, and Trinity"

The Agitator

Pastor Jeremiah Wright was a muslim? This is interesting... and it may explain a lot. When I heard of his rants against America I posted here that what pastor Jeremiah Wright saying is not different than what mullahs and imams teach in their madrasas in the middle east and Pakistan.

"Wright is one of the first people Obama thanked after his Senate victory in 2004, and he recently name-checked Wright in his speech to civil rights leaders in Selma, Alabama."

This article makes only a passing reference to Wright's being a former muslim. There is no other mention of it anywhere in the article. It certainly deserves further investigation.

The article is pretty revealing about what kind of a politician Barack Hussein Obama is though. It is no surprise to me as I have demonstrated over and over again, libRAT politicians are ruthless, power hungry people who only care about their own self interests. Isn't that so Mr. Obama?

""I wouldn't be a U.S. senator or out of Chicago or a presidential candidate from Illinois if I didn't have some sense of the world as it actually works," he said. "When I arrived in Chicago at the age of twenty-four, I didn't know a single person in Chicago, and I know an awful lot of folks now. And so, obviously, some of that has to do with me being pretty clear-eyed about power.""

"Barack Obama joined Democratic presidential rival Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday in calling for President Bush to boycott the opening ceremonies for the Olympic Games in Beijing."

Obama urges Bush to boycott Beijing - Yahoo! News

So we have the brave libRATs protesting China's treatment of Tibet. Those idiots have been driving around with their "FREE TIBET" bumper stickers for years and what did they accomplish: A BIG NOTHING! What will we accomplish if we boycott the olympics: A BIG NOTHING! What will the President of the U.S. accomplish when he boycotts the opening ceremonies: A BIG NOTHING! What did Jimmy Carter the dufus president accomplished when he boycotted the olympics: A BIG NOTHING!

Democrats are A BIG NOTHING party folks. If democrats were riled up about Saddam's treatment of his own people, and Republicans did not care, Saddam would still be in power and liberal democRATs in this country would be driving with their "FREE IRAQ" bumper stickers. You would occasionally see them bravely protesting naked in central park in New York or on Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco.

I remember liberal feminists being pretty upset about taliban's treatment of women before 9/11/2001. I am sure they had bumper stickers and solidarity art junkets to save the Afghani women. What did they accomplish: A BIG NOTHING!.

Mr. Barack Hussein OBAMA wants us to get out of Iraq so the Al Qaida can claim victory, commit mass murder and Iran's fanatic islamist mullahs can expand their influence in the middle-east. I guess Mr. Barack Hussein OBAMA would then boycott the world's islamic carnival in protest. What an idiot!

I have been calling modern democrats democRATs or lib-RATs here on this blog. Although it rhymes and sounds good it just does not reflect the true nature of these lib-RATs and quite frankly, it may be unfair to the Rats.

I probably will keep referring to the modern day democrats as libRats because it is easier and I just don't care about being fair to the Rats.

It is time that democRAts change their logo from donkey to... WEASEL.

"In English-language popular culture in particular, the term "weasel" is associated with devious characters.

Weasel - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

libRats are devious characters who act in their own self-interest and who will lie, steal, cheat and do anything to get and stay in power. It is about time they change their logo to reflect their true nature.

Look at their presidential candidates: Two big weasels who keep lying through their noses to get the nomination.

"A strand in Western society -- a combination of European nihilism, self-loathing and timidity -- favors appeasement. It is not the strength of our enemies but our weakness that might be our ruin.

Should "Fitna" lead to violence and protests against the Dutch, Europe will hopefully show more solidarity than it did with the Danes during the cartoon crisis. Any weakness in the resolve to defend our democratic legal order should be seen for what it is: Betrayal and cowardice."

Criticism and Islam - WSJ.com

Nihilism, self-loathing and timidity. Betrayal and cowardice. These are the words that define LIBeral democRATs in the U.S. Today.

Right after we were attacked on our soil by muslim extremists, these self-loathing RATs tried to explain that we were to be blamed for the attacks. Their presidential candidate's pastor, only six days after September 11, welcomed the attacks and said the America deserved it. For years, these timid RATs tried to teach our kids how wonderful the religion of islam is. These same RATs who claim that they will defend the right of any junk artist's right to free expression when that artist puts together a garbage that insults and offends Christians, want to censor even a simple cartoon depiction of islam's prophet. They are asking us to give up our Western civilization and freedoms because they are cowards.

It will only be the end result of this self-loathing on the part of democRATs that they will have a presidential nominee who attended an islamic madrasa when he was young, whose first name is arabic, middle name is the name of the murderous tyrant of Iraq, and last name could be confused with the name of the islamofascist mastermind of September 11 attacks. This nominee will not wear an American Flag on his lapel and will not stand at attention when the national anthem is played. He has a wife who was not proud of her own country not until democRATs start voting for her husband. He has a pastor who has been spewing anti-American hate-speech from the pulpit. To fulfill the democRATs' cowardice and betrayal, this nominee is promising to pull out of Iraq and meet with our enemies.

Going back to Mr. Afshin Ellian's piece on Wall Street Journal Today; there is a genuine threat to Western Civilization by 6th century islam. As I pointed out on this blog repeatedly you cannot look at islam as a religion only and try to give it the Western idea of religious tolerance. Islam is a religion that demands to have its own political and legal rules applied to the society. These rules are directly opposite of what we believe in the Western world. Our self-loathing, timid and coward liberal democRATs may wish that by giving in to the demands of muslims they will be left alone. That's a pipe dream. Islamists want world domination and they will do it by taking advantage of freedoms and tolerance Western civilization offers them only to throw all these freedoms away when they are in power. This point cannot be any more obvious and demands an answer to the question: Why cannot democRATs understand this? I have my own opinion but I would love to hear what everyone else thinks.