02 Jan 2008
"My reaction to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto?
What did you expect?
Let's see: Bhutto was a woman who refused to cower behind a veil. She believed in democracy and human rights, and opposed jihad. And she aspired to govern Pakistan again, as she had twice before, in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
So naturally the savages killed her."
GrasstopsUSA.com
I did not know Condoleeza Rice called islam the "religion of peace and love". Well, you gotta read Don Feder's piece to see some of the acts of "peace and love" by followers of islam.
"It takes a tremendous and sustained act of will to ignore the elephant in the living room -- the one wearing a dynamite-belt and shouting "Allahu Akabar!"
But the guys and gals reporting the news are more than capable of that act of willful blindness.
The 9,000-member Society of Professional Journalists has a set of guidelines for covering Muslim murder, which could have been written by the Council on American Islamic Relations, they include:
1. When writing about Islamic terror, be sure to include references to white supremacists and anti-abortionists.
2. Don't use terms like "Islamic terrorist" or "Muslim terrorist." (Instead, say Religion of Peace struggler or overly enthusiastic Muslim.)
3. Jihad means exertion to improve one's self or Islam (through bomb-building, sharp-shooting, hijacking airliners, etc.).
4. Get Muslims to vet the articles.
Or get your news directly from Al-Jazeera, and eliminate the middleman."
Phony media combined with suicidal multi-culturalism working to destroy Western Civilization.
"Reacting to the Bhutto assassination, Sen. Fred Thompson (who has a sound understanding of foreign policy) observed, "This is a war, a clash of civilizations.""
That's why I like Fred Thompson.
One other point to observe on Benazir Bhutto's assasination is that it is a great example of how liberal democrats discriminate between dictators: They love the communist, leftist dictators or dictator wanna bees: Castro and Chavez. They want to work with the dictators who want to harm us: Saddam, Assad, Mullahs in Iran. They want to destroy the dictators who are on our side: Shah, Musharraf. You never hear them talk about bringing democracy to Cuba, Syria or Iran. Heck they claim Iraqis can't handle democracy. They even say that the Iraqi people were better off under Saddam's dictatorship. But the same liberal democrats are all hopping mad about Musharraf. Now if you have a little common sense you will conclude what is obvious: Liberal democrats (LibRATS) are no friends of the U.S.
719x Viewed | Karma points: -15. Do you like this article? [yes/no]
