<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NonStopSite &#187; liberalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonstopsite.com/tag/liberalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonstopsite.com</link>
	<description>Uncommon Common Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Path to Tyrany</title>
		<link>http://www.nonstopsite.com/path-to-tyrany/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonstopsite.com/path-to-tyrany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skipd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinton said that there needs to be either "more balance in the programs or have some opportunity for people to offer countervailing opinions." Clinton added that he didn't support repealing the Fairness Doctrine, an act done under Reagan's FCC. In the past week, a couple Democratic Senators, Debbie Stabenow and Tom Harkin, have both spoken [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><blockquote><p>Clinton said that there needs to be either "more balance in the programs or have some opportunity for people to offer  countervailing opinions." Clinton added that he didn't support repealing the Fairness Doctrine, an act done under Reagan's FCC.</p>
<p>In the past week, a couple Democratic Senators, Debbie Stabenow and Tom Harkin, have both spoken favorably about the Fairness Doctrine, or holding hearings on radio accountability.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fblogs%2Fmichaelcalderone%2F0209%2FClinton_wants_more_balance_on_the_airwaves.html&sref=rss">Clinton wants 'more balance' on airwaves</a></p>
<p>Here a few comments on this post with my comments:</p>
<blockquote><p>For all the tirades about Bush as a "dictator," he never did anything do abridge free speech. Anyone who supports this type of legislation restricting speech is following the true path to tyrany.</p></blockquote>
<p>Liberal democRATs incessantly complain about Republicans and accuse them of all the things they themselves plan on doing. Thanks to phony media their complaints are amplified and liberal democRATs are presented as innocents. Obama - Pelosi - Reid democRATs are after absolute power. They detest ordinary Americans and they will do anything to limit our freedoms.</p>
<blockquote><p>Don't these people realize that there WERE programs for "the other side" and they not only flopped (as in few listeners) but sponsors didn't want to invest in them because they were a waste of marketing dollars. The people voted with their listening dollars and there-in lies your answer!</p></blockquote>
<p>Why do you think the liberal democRATs hate free market or our freedoms. Folks, liberal democRATs are not interested in "fairness". They want the "RIGHT-TALK" on radio. They want people to "RIGHT-THINK". We would not hear them talking about a "fairness" doctrine if the radio talk shows were all dominated by liberals. look at TV news, infotainment shows, major newspapers and Hollywood. No liberal democRAT is talking about fairness there. Heck, these people have been trying to shut Fox News up. </p>
<p>Look at their understanding of "independent" journalist:</p>
<blockquote><p>Tuesdayâ€™s Politico broke the news that ABC News's Chief Washington Correspondent and the host of ABC's Sunday morning news show This Week George Stephanopoulos has daily phone discussions with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel during which he helps formulate and shape the thoughts of and messaging for Emmanuel and the Barack Obama Administration. And that he has had these conversations with Emanuel throughout his tenure at ABC. </p>
<p>CNN liberal pundits Paul Begala and James Carville also participate in the daily round robin telephonic strategy sessions. In the article, Begala said he often canâ€™t remember the originator of any particular insight, and is quoted as saying â€œWe talk so much â€” was this my idea that James changed, or was this Georgeâ€™s observation that Rahm tweaked?â€</p>
<p>Stephanopoulos first joined ABC News as an analyst in 1997. He was serving as a fill-in anchor by 2001 and became host of This Week in September of 2002. When named to what would seem to be an unrealistic post for him in June of that year, Stephanopoulos asserted â€œIf I were biased, I donâ€™t believe I would have gotten the job.â€ </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mrc.org%2Fpress%2F2009%2Fpress20090129.asp&sref=rss">Bozell: ABC's Stephanopoulos Must Recuse Himself From Any Reporting Involving The Obama Administration</a></p>
<p>Don't hold your breath Mr. Bozell. </p>
<p>For more on phony media coverage visit <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaresearch.org%2Fwelcome.asp&sref=rss">Media Research Center</a>. I don't regularly watch these propagandists on their nightly, weekly news or morning entertainment shows but reading and watching the excerpts on this site from time to time make my stomach sick. </p>
<p>The simple fact is liberal democRATs are intolerant bunch of elitists who think they know what's best for us all simpletons. They detest us. That's why they want us to abort our babies, to send our kids only to public schools so they can brainwash them, to leave our farms to make room for frogs, to commit suicide to prevent global warming bullshit and finally to go away and die quietly without being a burden to their so-called health care system.</p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://www.nonstopsite.com/path-to-tyrany/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://www.nonstopsite.com/path-to-tyrany/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonstopsite.com/path-to-tyrany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Biggest Scam in The History of The U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.nonstopsite.com/biggest-scam-in-the-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonstopsite.com/biggest-scam-in-the-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skipd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in May when Maxine Waters threatened oil company executives with "socializing" their companies, most people laughed at her stupidity. I posted on May 24th that I was surprised with liberal democRATs' candidness in saying what they really think this year. You'll see in the video that people sitting next to her are amused by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Back in May when Maxine Waters threatened oil company executives with "socializing" their companies, most people laughed at her stupidity. I <a href="http://www.nonstopsite.com/item/2008/05/liberal-democrats-are-showing-their-true-colors">posted on May 24th</a> that I was surprised with liberal democRATs' candidness in saying what they really think this year.</p>
<blockquote><p>You'll see in the video that people sitting next to her are amused by her statement. It is not funny folks. These libRATs have been working hard to dumb-down their own constituency for years. They have been using propaganda with the help of phony media. I guarantee you that there were ignorant people watching this and getting all excited about taking over the oil industry. There is a reason socialists like Maxine Waters feel more confident to say what they really think.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here is the link to the video: <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DPUaY3LhJ-IQ&sref=rss">Maxine Waters wants to nationalize oil industry</a>.</p>
<p>This is what she says: "And guess what this liberal would be all about. This liberal will be about socializing â€¦ uh, um. â€¦ Would be about, basically, taking over, and the government running all of your companies. â€¦"</p>
<p>Congress just socialized the mortgage industry by passing this bailout bill. </p>
<p>This is done by democRATs on purpose. It is part of their agenda of taking over our economy. They were the ones who set the government-backed mortgage scheme. They were the ones who forced private lending institutions make bad lending decisions in the name of social engineering. They are the ones who blocked the oversight and regulation of this system.</p>
<p>The same democRATs who caused this whole thing by meddling with free markets in the name of social engineering are blaming it on the free market. They think we are stupid! Well, they already got quite a few Stupid Republicans to go along with them to take control of more of our economy so they can keep marching towards socialism.</p>
<p>I <a href="http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/2008/10/fannie-mae-and-congressional-black-caucus/">wrote before</a> folks, why work hard, save money, do your research and try to make wise decisions when it comes to your financial situation. Give up your freedoms, give up your future aspirations for a better life and replace them with cozy security and warm poverty liberal socialist democRATs will bring for you. As long as you think the right way, say the right things, be content living within the poverty level and vote for them in all sham elections; you will have a free home, work in a government created job project, get free health care (mostly none), free education, pre-school to university, for your children (more brain washing), decent prices for your basic needs (rationing). <strong>"Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness" will be replaced by "Death to Misfits, Total Belief and Trust in Your Supreme Ruler Obama"</strong>.</p>
<p>Yes folks, democRATs have a presidential nominee who is promising to turn this country into a socialist tyranny. Tax cuts for 95%, when only 70% is paying taxes, means a socialist welfare state is in the horizon. "A civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded" as our military means the socialist tyrant will have his storm troopers patrolling the streets. He already have volunteer law enforcement personnel working to silence people who speak against him. Most of the media is already in lock step with his agenda, actively spreading his propaganda. The plans already drawn to shut down the conservative talk radio under the guise of fairness. Believe me when I say the socialist tyrant will also figure out way to silence blogs on the internet when he consolidates his power. </p>
<p>It is a perfect storm and it is up to us to stop this now! McCain may not be the perfect nominee but he needs to win by a landslide. We also need to throw all these socialist democRATs along with spineless stupid Republicans out. Our way of life is under grave threat. We must act now!</p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://www.nonstopsite.com/biggest-scam-in-the-history/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://www.nonstopsite.com/biggest-scam-in-the-history/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonstopsite.com/biggest-scam-in-the-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamas&#8217; Politics of Change</title>
		<link>http://www.nonstopsite.com/obamas-politics-of-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonstopsite.com/obamas-politics-of-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skipd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me state the obvious right off the bat: Obama is a money-grubbing, vote-buying, lying, cheating liberal politician. Now let's do a little web surf: Obama donor received a state grant - LA Times His letter on behalf of a table tennis company preceded the funding. Small potatoes you say? Did Michelle Obama funnel contract [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Let me state the obvious right off the bat: <strong>Obama is a money-grubbing, vote-buying, lying, cheating liberal politician.</strong></p>
<p>Now let's do a little web surf:</p>
<p><a title="LA Times Article" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.latimes.com%2Fnews%2Fnationworld%2Fwashingtondc%2Fla-na-killerspin27apr27%2C0%2C6061900%2Cfull.story&sref=rss" target="_blank">Obama donor received a state grant</a> - LA Times</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="storysubhead" style="margin: 0px 0px 15px; color: #333333 ! important;">His letter on behalf of a table tennis company preceded the funding.</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="storysubhead" style="margin: 0px 0px 15px; color: #333333 ! important;">Small potatoes you say?</div>
<div class="storysubhead" style="margin: 0px 0px 15px; color: #333333 ! important;"><a title="American Thinker" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2008%2F08%2Fdid_michelle_obama_funnel_cont.html&sref=rss" target="_blank">Did Michelle Obama funnel contract to big fundraiser?</a></div>
<blockquote>
<div class="storysubhead" style="margin: 0px 0px 15px; color: #333333 ! important;"><span>The Washington Post notes that Michelle Obama's employer,Â University of Chicago Medical Center,Â  gave a $650,000 contract to Blackwell Consulting.Â  The son of the owner,Â Â Robert Blackwell Jr., a former partner in the consulting firm, is one of her husband's long time fundraisers.</span></div>
</blockquote>
<div class="storysubhead" style="margin: 0px 0px 15px; color: #333333 ! important;">It is the same donor mentioned in the first article folks. $650,000 is not small potatoes by the way. It is our money. It is tax payers' money Obama using to pay back favors he received. Politics of Change, not so small change mind you...</div>
<div class="storysubhead" style="margin: 0px 0px 15px; color: #333333 ! important;">Don't forget Obama practices "Cronyism" as part of politics of change:</div>
<div class="storysubhead" style="margin: 0px 0px 15px; color: #333333 ! important;"><a title="Hot Air Article" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fhotair.com%2Farchives%2F2008%2F08%2F22%2Fa-nexus-of-cronyism-at-uic-medical-center%2F&sref=rss">A nexus of cronyism at UC Medical Center?</a></div>
<blockquote>
<div class="storysubhead" style="margin: 0px 0px 15px; color: #333333 ! important;">Blackwell not only is a major fundraiser for Obama, but <em>employed </em>him as an attorney â€” while getting public funds through UCMC from Michelle Obama.Â  Does this sound like a conflict of interest?Â  For one thing, did Blackwellâ€™s payments to Obama for legal services result from any actual work, or was this a method of getting cash to the Obamas while avoiding campaign-finance regulations?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>This is ingenious folks! You get tax payer money in the form of grants and earmarks to people who in turn contribute to your campaign. That must be the politics of quick change.</p>
<p class="blog_title_holder"><a title="The Campaign Spot Article" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcampaignspot.nationalreview.com%2Fpost%2F%3Fq%3DOGRiMWFhNWY4MTgzMjI3NjEzNGQwMWFiMTlhYmRhN2Y%3D&sref=rss" target="_blank"><span class="blog_title blog_media_title">One of Obama's Earmark Requests Was for the Hospital That Employs Michelle Obama</span></a></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="blog_title_holder"><span>"In 2006, the Chicago Tribune reported that Mrs. Obamaâ€™s compensation at the University of Chicago Hospital, where she is a vice president for community affairs, jumped from $121,910 in 2004, just before her husband was elected to the Senate, to $316,962 in 2005, just after he took office."</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Guess what happened after Obama took office? He landed her wife's employer a huge $1,000,000.00 earmark.</p>
<p>Do you know what Michelle Obama was doing for the UCH? She was the vice president for community and external affairs. Another "community" scheme by Obamas. I sure would like to know if there are similar positions in other hospitals around the country and if there are what the average salary is. She was previously the executive director for community affairs at the hospital. As a VP she was responsible for all programs and initiatives that involve the relationship between the Hospitals and the community. She also managed of the Hospitals' business diversity program. All liberal mumbo-jumbo for a cushy job created for a senator's wife...</p>
<p>Guess what this "community-organizer's" wife did as a "community relations" manager for this elite hospital? I mean aside from funneling money to cronies.</p>
<p><a title="Washington Post Article" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2008%2F08%2F21%2FAR2008082103646_pf.html&sref=rss" target="_blank">Obama Camp Has Many Ties to Wife's Employer</a></p>
<blockquote><p>One of Michelle Obama's signature efforts has been working to relieve crowding in the emergency room, the second-busiest in Chicago. It logs 80,000 visits a year.</p>
<p>Backed by a federal grant, Michelle Obama in 2005 launched the South Side Health Collaborative, under which counselors advise patients with noncritical needs that they can receive care elsewhere at a reduced cost. The medical center said in a report that some patients "make frequent visits to the ER because no one in the family has a personal doctor."</p>
<p>"Obama's goal is to connect people in the community with doctors at [community health] centers, to let them know that they can use those physicians on a regular basis instead of ignoring symptoms until they send them to the ER, where care can cost five times more."</p>
<p>The hospital report quotes Michelle Obama as saying, "The world is seeping in, and our salvation will be the success of our partners" at local clinics.</p></blockquote>
<p>"<strong>The world seeping in</strong>". Yes, she worked to keep the community out of this hospital. Liberal elites just can't let "the world seeping in" to their exclusive world. The community just needs to stay poor and miserable and agitated and keep voting for liberal democRATs. Michele Obama did a great job as a liberal elitist.</p>
<p>This is what Obama's politics of change about folks: Same old <strong>money-grubbing, vote-buying, lying, cheating, elitist, oppressive liberalism.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DQwjnT4eJJvs&sref=rss">www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwjnT4eJJvs</a></p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://www.nonstopsite.com/obamas-politics-of-change/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://www.nonstopsite.com/obamas-politics-of-change/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonstopsite.com/obamas-politics-of-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same old liberal democRAT attack: Palin is Stupid!</title>
		<link>http://www.nonstopsite.com/same-old-liberal-democrat-attack-palin-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonstopsite.com/same-old-liberal-democrat-attack-palin-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skipd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But it's not clear exactly how Obama and his running mate Joe Biden should respond. They keenly remember how women rallied around one-time Democratic front runner Clinton when they perceived she was a victim of sexism. They don't want to appear with a weak response, either, and certainly they also don't want to send independent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><blockquote><p>But it's not clear exactly how Obama and his running mate Joe Biden should respond. They keenly remember how women rallied around one-time Democratic front runner Clinton when they perceived she was a victim of sexism. They don't want to appear with a weak response, either, and certainly they also don't want to send independent women flocking to the GOP.</p>
<p>The solution, at least in the short term, will be have top-tier female supporters vouch for Obama to largely female audiences and keep the candidate himself away.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.yahoo.com%2Fs%2Fap%2F20080905%2Fap_on_el_pr%2Fcvn_obama_women&sref=rss">Obama sends supporters to blunt Palin's impact</a> - Yahoo News</p>
<p>So how do the liberal democRATs attack Palin while avoiding sexism?</p>
<blockquote><p>"She mastered the words written by the Bush speechwriters and delivered them well. But what we didn't hear was what people talk to me about every day," Sebelius told reporters.</p>
<p>...</p>
<p>It was slightly more polite than Axelrod: "She tried to attack Senator Obama by saying he had no significant legislative achievements. Maybe that's what she was told."</p></blockquote>
<p>So the liberal democRATs claim a woman like Sarah Palin just cannot think for herself. She is stupid. Somebody else is writing her lines and spoon-feeding her with words to utter. No, no, no.. She is stupid not because she is a woman... No sir! That would be sexism. She is stupid because she is republican. You see Palin is a mother who refused to stay home, who became active in her "community", took leadership roles, involved in politics and became successful while kicking men's butts. If only she was smart enough to be a liberal democRAT... She would be hailed as a feminist hero today. Hollywood would be busy producing a movie about her fight against the good old boys' political machine. Nightly news anchors, cable news hosts and their guests would be talking about her "native intelligence", her "brilliant mind".</p>
<p>Take notice women of America: If you want to be celebrated by the media, TV, movie, entertainment elite in this country, become a liberal. It is easy! Just pick one or two issues and memorize a few slogans.</p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://www.nonstopsite.com/same-old-liberal-democrat-attack-palin-stupid/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://www.nonstopsite.com/same-old-liberal-democrat-attack-palin-stupid/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonstopsite.com/same-old-liberal-democrat-attack-palin-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evan Sayet at the Restoration Weekend</title>
		<link>http://www.nonstopsite.com/evan-sayet-at-the-restoration-weekend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonstopsite.com/evan-sayet-at-the-restoration-weekend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skipd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evan sayet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWfZi1W13Go Part 2 www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ08kg_iwdg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><strong>Part 1</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DSWfZi1W13Go&sref=rss">www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWfZi1W13Go</a></p>
<p><strong>Part 2</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DSZ08kg_iwdg&sref=rss">www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ08kg_iwdg</a></p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonstopsite.com/evan-sayet-at-the-restoration-weekend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>45 Years Later Democrat Racists</title>
		<link>http://www.nonstopsite.com/45-years-later-democrat-racists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonstopsite.com/45-years-later-democrat-racists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skipd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin luther king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." We will never be able to live in that nation Martin Luther King described 45 years ago if we keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><strong>"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where  they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their  character." </strong></p>
<p>We will never be able to live in that nation Martin Luther King described 45 years ago if we keep giving into Liberal democRATs. We are not allowed to judge Barack Hussein Obama by the content of his character. Liberal democRATs can't get past Barack Hussein Obama's skin color. That's all that matters to them.Just vote for Obama the black candidate. Never mind that he is utterly unqualified; never mind he has a questionable past with ties to terrorists and America haters; never mind that he is for infanticide; never mind that his economic plan is socialism; never mind that his foreign policy is to give up our sovereignty. Just vote for the black guy!</p>
<p>Guess what folks... What if the black candidate was Republican? Racist Liberal democRATs would be calling him uncle TOM. They would come up with the most racist insults and comments just like they did to Clarence Thomas, Condy Rice, etc.</p>
<p>Modern American Liberal democRATs are the ones who stand in the way of achieving Martin Luther King's dream.</p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://www.nonstopsite.com/45-years-later-democrat-racists/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://www.nonstopsite.com/45-years-later-democrat-racists/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonstopsite.com/45-years-later-democrat-racists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Modern Liberals Think &#8211; Evan Sayet</title>
		<link>http://www.nonstopsite.com/how-modern-liberals-think-evan-sayet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonstopsite.com/how-modern-liberals-think-evan-sayet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skipd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c Here is another attempt at understanding Liberals and Liberalism. Evan Sayet is funny, articulate and dead on! It has been a long struggle to understand Liberals. I started blogging here to expose the utter stupidity of Liberals. That's why the tagline of this blog is "Uncommon Common Sense". As Evan says Liberals reject "Common [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DeaE98w1KZ-c&sref=rss">www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c</a></p>
<p>Here is another attempt at understanding Liberals and Liberalism. <a title="Evan Sayet" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.evansayet.com%2F&sref=rss" target="_blank">Evan Sayet</a> is funny, articulate and dead on!</p>
<p>It has been a long struggle to understand Liberals. I started blogging here to expose the utter stupidity of Liberals. That's why the tagline of this blog is "Uncommon Common Sense". As Evan says Liberals reject "Common Sense" just because it is common.</p>
<p>Rush Limbaugh uses the term "mind boggling" when he talks about what Liberals say and do. Honestly what Liberals say and do defy logic.</p>
<p>Evan Sayet does a good job trying to make sense of Liberalism only to end up comparing them to five-year olds. Make sure to watch the whole video including the Q &amp; A at the end to hear the statement that " Global Warming is a plot to..."</p>
<p>It is becoming clear to me that attempts to explain away Liberal's looniness by their stupidity, idiocy, lack of common sense or some sort of political vision do not help us get rid of them. Yes, we need to get rid of them. We need to defeat their ideology. What they have been doing to this country, our children, our past and future is no laughing matter. While we are coming up with creative ways to explain who they are and why they do what they do; they keep working relentlessly to destroy our lives, liberty and pursuit of happiness. So, I'm not one for to give them the benefit of doubt. If they have a utopian worldview that demands destruction of "good" to fight "evil"; it puts them on the side of evil. I am tired of trying to make sense of non-sensical.</p>
<p>These are the same people who tout their "superior intelligence" every chance they get. How can they not see the disastrous results of their actions?</p>
<p>My theory is that the Liberals are not biased, arrogant, dummy, stupid or utopian idealists folks. They know what they are doing. They have an agenda. While we are trying to understand their seemingly "mind boggling", "irrational", "immoral" ways, they keep plugging along. <strong>It is time to stop them</strong>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://www.nonstopsite.com/how-modern-liberals-think-evan-sayet/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://www.nonstopsite.com/how-modern-liberals-think-evan-sayet/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonstopsite.com/how-modern-liberals-think-evan-sayet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberal Fascism by Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.nonstopsite.com/liberal-fascism-by-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonstopsite.com/liberal-fascism-by-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skipd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEhzvyblUy4 "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." Unbelievable! "Just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." What the hell is this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p style="text-align: center;">
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DsEhzvyblUy4&sref=rss">www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEhzvyblUy4</a></p>
</p>
<p>"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."</p>
<p>Unbelievable! "<strong>Just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded</strong>." What the hell is this guy smoking?</p>
<p>Obama Hussein who is <a title="Obama wants to gut our military" href="http://www.nonstopsite.com/item/2008/05/suicidal-ideas-by-barack-hussein-obama-2">committed to gut our military</a> wants to create his own storm troopers! This guy can't trust our military so he wants to create his own military.</p>
<p>This guy who made his own presidential seal,</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/obama_seal-192x300.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="192" height="300" /></p>
<p>This guy who removed the American Flag from the tail of his campaign jet and replaced it with his "O" seal,</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/obamaplanetail.jpg" border="0" alt="Obama's Plane" width="239" height="318" /></p>
<p>now wants to have his own storm troopers.</p>
<p>This is what the modern liberal democRAT party is about folks. This is their presidential nominee.</p>
<p>This the guy who said:</p>
<blockquote><p>"As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus for Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington. First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning -- and as president, I will end it. Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending. I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems, and I will institute an independent defense priorities board to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending. Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material, and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals. You know where I stand."</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes folks, his idea of national security is to disarm ourselves while building his own dictatorship with his "civilian national security force".</p>
<p>This is a guy whose wife said:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism . . . that you come out of your isolation. . . . Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed."</p></blockquote>
<p>Now we know what the "civilian national security force" is for.</p>
<p>This whole thing is outrageous. It is time to say NO OBAMA! NOBAMA!</p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://www.nonstopsite.com/liberal-fascism-by-obama/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://www.nonstopsite.com/liberal-fascism-by-obama/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonstopsite.com/liberal-fascism-by-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberal Egotism</title>
		<link>http://www.nonstopsite.com/liberal-egotism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonstopsite.com/liberal-egotism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skipd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonstopsite.com/blog/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A convention hall isn't good enough for the presumptive Democratic nominee. He plans to deliver his acceptance speech in the 75,000 seat stadium where the Denver Broncos play. Before a vote is cast, he's embarking on a foreign policy tour that will use cheering Europeans - and America's top news anchors - as extras in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><blockquote><p>A convention hall isn't good enough for the presumptive Democratic nominee. He plans to deliver his acceptance speech in the 75,000 seat stadium where the Denver Broncos play. Before a vote is cast, he's embarking on a foreign policy tour that will use cheering Europeans - and America's top news anchors - as extras in his campaign. What do you expect from a candidate who already auditioned a quasi-presidential seal with the Latin inscription, "Vero possumus" - "Yes, we can"?</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=17139X755290&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boston.com%2Fbostonglobe%2Feditorial_opinion%2Foped%2Farticles%2F2008%2F07%2F20%2Fthe_audacity_of_ego%2F&sref=rss">The audacity of ego - The Boston Globe</a>.</p>
<p>This is what you get with liberals! Me, me, me, and more me... That's all they care about. It's all about them.</p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://www.nonstopsite.com/liberal-egotism/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://www.nonstopsite.com/liberal-egotism/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonstopsite.com/liberal-egotism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

