NASA’s New Mission: Help Muslims Feel Good

Posted by skipd on Jul 6, 2010 in News, Politics | 0 comments

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a recent interview that his "foremost" mission as the head of America's space exploration agency is to improve relations with the Muslim world.

Though international diplomacy would seem well outside NASA's orbit, Bolden said in an interview with Al Jazeera that strengthening those ties was among the top tasks President Obama assigned him. He said better interaction with the Muslim world would ultimately advance space travel.

NASA Chief: Next Frontier Better Relations With Muslim World

I had to read this twice... I just could not believe what I was reading.

Unbelievable but true folks: Americans were fooled into electing a muslim as their President. I hope to God that they understand their grave mistake and throw all the democRATs out in November and impeach this muslim out of office.

What is also mystifying to me is that people like this NASA administrator is going along with this utter nonsense. How can he agree to this idiotic proposal of turning NASA into a muslim outreach organization. How can he let himself be an accessory in tearing down one of our finest organizations? Is his job and pension more important? Have you no shame sir? How can all these democrats not the leftists RATs but mainstream democrats not see what Obama is doing to this country?

Obama has islamists in his administration advocating global caliphate and promoting sharia law. He has been sending millions of dollars to islamists in the middle east. His Attorney General can't say "Radical Islam" when talking about a guy who wanted to blow up a bomb in Times Square and wanted to kill as many American children as he can and proud to declare himself as a "muslim soldier." Obama won't even acknowledge the Ford Hood jihadi attack on our brave soldiers. He has been apologizing muslims on our behalf. He has been sending our hard earned money to islamists who want to kill us. Now he wants to use NASA to help muslims feel good.

November 2010 can't come soon enough...

Do you remember the phrase “connecting the dots”?

Posted by skipd on Nov 10, 2009 in Islam, News, Politics | 0 comments

Do you remember the phrase "connecting the dots"? Liberal democRATs were obsessed with it after 9-11. Our Kenyan-Indonesian-muslim president seems to willfully ignore the evidence in the shooting of American soldiers by a jihadi muslim. One can effectively make the case that the shooting of an American soldier may be a new al-qeada tactic and the shooter was a terrorist not a lone crazy like the other two shooters in other incidents.

Obama’s reactions to recent violent acts

Folks, above paragraph was written not after the Fort Hood islamist terror attack. It was written back in June after another homegrown islamists terrorist, Carlos Bledsoe, killed an American soldier and wounded another.

This is what I had posted also:

Sure, it was just an isolated incident. What is this muslim's full name? "Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad". Guess what "Mujahid" means? It means "one who is waging jihad". No, no, no it is not the peaceful, internal struggle as islam apologists claim. It is the fight against the infidel. That's what jihad is and this "Mujahid" is a foot soldier of islam's war against the people who do not submit to islam. We have jihad being waged right here and our government officials kidding themselves with this BS. How many more Americans need to be killed by "mujahids" before we get serious about this threat folks?

Jihadis are killing our soldiers here in our own country

The propaganda arm of democRAT party, now state controlled media and Obama administration doing everything to make us believe that Fort Hood attack was another isolated incident of violance by a nut case.

Folks, a cursory read of the facts, attacker's background, information about his beliefs and his history proves absolutely beyond doubt that this man was inspired by his radical islamist beliefs to shoot American soldiers. the guy had a business card declaring that he was a "soldier of allah". He was openly anti American. He was'n even shy about what he believes, thinks and hopes to happen to Americans.

It is totally inexplicable that Barack Hussein Obama cannot figure out what Major Jihadi Hassan's motive was. It is totally inexplicable that propaganda arm of the democRAT party, main stream media, are trying to find excuses for a man who killed 14 people and wounded 29 others.

These are the same people who cried that we failed to "connect the dots" to prevent 9/11 attacks. Don't get me wrong, these same people, even after 9/11/2001, blamed us for the attacks and tried to find excuses for the muslim attackers even then but they were incensed that we failed to connect the dots. Folks we had direct lines right in front of our military and FBI about the Fort Hood islamist terrorist.

The dots were already connected.

Why did the Obama administration fail to protect Americans? The number one job of the President of The United States is to Protect and Defend the American people. Having been failed miserably in preventing the biggest terror attack in US soil, Obama administration is now pretending this was not a terror attack. The Obama's homeland security department wants to protect muslims after a muslim slaughtered 14 Americans. Since 1970s 3,308+ killed by Muslims in America in 65 terror attacks. Obama & Napolitano are worried about safety of the muslims. Obama's top commander in the Army is worried about diversity and actually said this: “As horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” This guy should have been fired on the spot.

I asked this question before: If you are a multiculturalist celebrating diversity and you find out the aim of one culture you celebrate is to destroy you and your culture; what do you do? We know what rational people do: Defend and protect themselves by any means possible. We also are learning that Obama and the people in his administration are either delusional or they are the agents of this other culture that wnats to destroy us. I am sorry but there is no way to explain this ant other way in light of overwhelming evidence we have.

Why did Obama sell Chrysler out to Fiat?

Posted by skipd on Jun 8, 2009 in Islam, News, Politics | 0 comments

Chrysler executives still hoped to avoid bankruptcy. The UAW had ratified a second round of concessions that froze wages, cut retiree health care benefits and agreed not to strike the company for more than six years. All but a handful of lenders had signed off on the U.S. Treasury's offer of $2 billion to write off $6.9 billion in Chrysler loans.

Reluctantly, however, the leaders were recognizing the harsh decision Rattner made weeks earlier: Chrysler was filing for Chapter 11, no matter what.

Rattner had met with Ron Kolka, Chrysler's chief financial officer, and told him how it would go.

"We need a deal with Fiat today. We were told to pretty much take it," Kolka wrote in an e-mail to Nardelli, Vice Chairman Tom LaSorda and Robert Manzo, a financial consultant Chrysler hired in November. Rattner and his colleague Ron Bloom "will call the union in and tell them what will happen. Then they'll tell the banks, 'Here's the deal: take it or liquidate it.' "

Obama's man called shots on bankruptcy BY GREG GARDNER - Detroit Free Press

This whole thing stinks folks.

Why Fiat? I thought one reason Obama and liberal democRATs sold out Chrysler to Fiat was to force production of tiny cars here in the U.S. I thought the enviro-communists saw a great opportunity in taking over a car company. I still believe this was one of the reasons but why was Obama so eager to sell Chrysler out to Fiat? Were there other reasons?

Whose interest was President Obama serving when on March 30 he ordered Chrysler to either conclude a merger with Italian automaker Fiat within 30 days or lose federal bailout funds? That untimely announcement placed Chrysler in the untenable position of accepting whatever Fiat offered, literally cutting the legs out from under the struggling American carmaker’s negotiating platform. Some financial analysts had already determined that what Fiat was offering was a very bad deal for Chrysler. “The steal of the century,” Forbes columnist Jerry Flint wrote of the deal back in January, “Fiat gets Chrysler for next to no money, and American taxpayers must throw in $7 billion to make it happen.” By most accounts, Chrysler was in real trouble, but by announcing to the world that Chrysler had no other alternatives Obama effectively told Fiat that Chrysler would accept whatever they offered, eliminating Chrysler’s ability to cut a better deal.

Why would President Obama undercut a US company, involved in a heated negotiation, in favor of a foreign company’s interest? Clear answers are not available, but there is one very curious shareholder in Fiat that raises some interesting questions. The African nation of Libya owns at least a 2 to 3 percent stake in Fiat and thus makes Muammar Qaddafi, who controls the wealth of Libya, a direct beneficiary of the deal favoring Fiat.

Does Obama owe Qaddafi? That is a tough question to answer, but Obama’s record-shattering 700 million dollar presidential fundraising operation and a revealing speech made by Qaddafi nearly a year ago seems to undress Obama’s inexplicable sabotage of Chrysler’s negotiating position with Fiat.

Obama - Qaddafi Coincidence? by Scott Wheeler - Townhall.com

We know that Obama is paying back the unions who helped him get elected. Is he also paying back Gaddafi?

Let's go back to 1986:

Because of Libya's investment in Fiat, the Pentagon has decided not to award a proposed $7.9 million contract to the company under which it would have built 178 earthmovers for the U.S. Marine Corps. Reason: the Reagan Administration does not want any American money to flow--even indirectly--into the coffers of a government that sponsors international terrorism.

Fiat's Silent Partners - Time.com

This was back in 1986. In the year 2009, the United States has a Kenyan-Indonesian-muslim president who is paying back people who helped him fraud Americans electing him by raising $700 million during the presidential campaign. Is the terrorist Gaddafi one of his fund raisers?

Barack Hussein Obama seems to be taking Gaddafi's advice also:

Gaddafi said Obama should adopt a policy of supporting poor and weak peoples such as the Palestinians and be a friend of what he called free Arab peoples rather than U.S. "agents" in the Arab world who, he said, were hated by their own people.

"We still hope he will be proud of Africa and change America and free America of its past policy, namely with the Arabs," said Gaddafi.

Gaddafi warns Obama against "inferiority complex" - Reuters - Jun 11,2008

Islamic socialism and pan-arabism / pan-islamism... Look at Hussein's address to the muslims where he addressed the world's muslims as a monolithic group that supposedly suffered under western economic and cultural imperialism...

This whole thing stinks...

Obama’s Cowardly Act of Appeasement

Posted by skipd on Jun 4, 2009 in Main | 0 comments

Kenyan-Indonesian-muslim president of the United States gave his much anticipated speech to the muslim world. What a sad day it is not only for the United States that is no longer the beacon of freedom for all the oppressed people around the world but also for these oppressed people especially the millions who are suffering under the rule of islam a backward political, economical and religious system based on hate and violence.

Text of Obama's speech in Cairo

I will not get into the details of this moronic speech. You can find an excellent analysis at Jihad Watch: Platitudes and naivete: Obama's Cairo speech

Here are simple, common sense observations about Supreme Idiot's arrogant attempt at appeasing muslims:

1) Almost everything he says about islam is untrue. He made up facts and re-wrote history to make islam look good. It is painfully evident for anyone who barely paid attention to what is going on around the world within the last ten years that islam is not a religion of peace. It is a political, legal, economical system based on religious rules established in 6th century. It is backward. It is the anti-thesis of western ideals of freedom, liberty, democracy and whole lot of things we value and cherish. Islam is anti science. Don't believe the BS about muslims inventing stuff. Did you know that islamic scholars believe that everything there is to be known is in the Quran and it is a waste to try to learn things by studying science? This moron of a president always talks about American values. Can he just show us one value islam espouses that is compatible with American values? Why is he taking the role of the biggest propagandist for islam?

2) What about the idea that all muslims are the same? Why is this moron stereotyping the muslims by a moronic speech that is addressing the muslim world? Guess who else is talking about muslim world? They are the people who are dreaming of a muslim dominated world: Pan-islamists. We call them crazies for thinking they can bring Arabs, Egyptians, Indonesian, Turks and many more cultures, nations and ethnic groups together under the flag of islam. Well, I am sure they feel much better about their ideas now because the POTUS just addressed muslims of the world and put them all under one islamic flag. Wouldn't you find it obscenely offensive if the head of any country makes a speech claiming to address all the Christians of the world?

3) This speech, in its totality, is a cowardly act of appeasement. It will not do anything to keep us safe, to bring peace or anything this moron claims. It is just another giant ego trip by a moron called Barack Hussein Obama who now sees no reason to hide his muslim roots.

Obama’s muslim deception cheered by the phony media

Posted by skipd on Jun 3, 2009 in Islam, News | 0 comments

ABC News' Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller report: The other day we heard a comment from a White House aide that never would have been uttered during the primaries or general election campaign.
...

"the President himself experienced Islam on three continents before he was able to -- or before he's been able to visit, really, the heart of the Islamic world -- you know, growing up in Indonesia, having a Muslim father -- obviously Muslim Americans (are) a key part of Illinois and Chicago."

The Emergence of President Obama's Muslim Roots

This is always the same with liberal RATS. They are not what they represent themselves to be and the phony media help them with this deception. Look at the deceiver-in-chief's SCOTUS nominee: An affirmative action agitator and a race baiter obsessed with identity politics is presented as a great American story. As far as I can understand this latina resents America.

Given widespread unease and prejudice against Muslims among Americans, especially in the wake of 9/11, the Obama campaign was perhaps understandably very sensitive during the primaries and general election to downplay the candidate's Muslim roots.

The candidate was even offended when referred to by his initials "BHO," because he considered the use of his middle name, "Hussein," an attempt to frighten voters.

What a bunch of crap! First, there is no "prejudice" against muslims among Americans you idiots! It is common sense self defense posture against a religion and its followers that is bent on killing Americans. Second, Barack Hussein Obama deceived the American people and you in the phony media helped him get away with it. You morons took the orders from him and did not use his middle name "Hussein" until it became politically advantageous for him to use and he permitted you to use it. Voters are not frightened by the name "Hussein" which happens to be the name of a tyrant we removed in Iraq. I am sure the RATs are happy we got our own tyrant with the name Hussein. Obama was the one who was frightened that the voters will catch up with his deception. Now we got a muslim-kenyan-indonesian in the White House who can not even produce his birth certificate to prove that he is a natural born citizen to be eligible to hold the office he is in.