Why is Obama so Insensitive to the victims of islamist terror?
After watching Obama's "frightening insensitivity" as NBC Chicago puts it, I am surprised that some people are surprised by his insensitivity.
You see NBC Chicago asks " Who is advising him?" Forget the fact that a Commander in Chief needs no advice when responding to an apparent act of terror on US Soldiers; whoever advising him also shares his disconnect and insensitivity.
If this was a school or workplace shooting that didn't involve a muslim shooting our soldiers, you would have seen him more sensitive to the victims. If this was a story about a white cop arresting an unruly black professor, Obama would have had no need to wait to get the details of what happened. He would have denounced the vile act and called the cop "stupid".
I am not making these things up. Similar things happened. See here:
Obama’s reactions to recent violent acts - June 11, 2009
Why do you think his reaction is so different when it involves a muslim waging jihad against us?
As far as his sensitivity concerned, may I remind you this:
Obama Throws Rose At Ground Zero - September 11, 2008
Seems like the video is disappeared from YouTube. I'll see if I can find another copy.
When I posted this video, someone commented about how irrelevant was this especially with all the "serious" stuff going around the world. I am re-posting my response here. You be the judge of how right I was:
Sphere: Related ContentBeware when liberals cry that we should stick with the issues and problems we face and ignore everything else. They did this when clinton abused his power and took advantage of a young intern in the white house. Why didn’t clinton deal with the issues instead of chasing skirt? He might have killed or captured Osama way before 2001 if he had done so. Now I will be accused of bringing clinton into this so let’s deal with the argument here:
1. It is not the issues but what the candidates’ proposals to solve these issues are. We already know that the GOP prefers market based solutions respectful of individual rights and freedoms. We also know that the democrats prefer government based solutions that take away individual rights and freedoms. Since no one in their own mind will vote for tyranny, democrats pretend to have moved to center in every election cycle. in the last congressional elections they ran on conservative issues only to change after elections. Obama makes different promises to sprout eatin’ liberals and gun clingin’ Americans. I wonder which promise he will keep when he gets elected?
2. The presidency is not a job that involves well-defined tasks and descriptions. The president may face issues we may have never dreamed of. It is not only what they promise to do about current issues but how they may behave when they face with an unexpected event and uncertain future. That’s why the character matters. That’s why the past experience and the wisdom gained from it matters. That’s why who they associated in past matters because they will need to bring in and work with people to solve those issues. If they have showed bad judgment picking friends and associates in the past they surely will do the same thing in the future. That’s why the little things like how a person behaves at a memorial service matter because it reveals their character, their wisdom and judgment. It tells us who this person really is. It is invaluable information especially when we just can not trust what that person is saying.
This is exactly why liberal democRATs do not want us to talk about the character, wisdom, honor, judgment of their candidates folks. They have none. All they have is empty promises that will be broken as soon as the election over.
read more
Liberal way of fighting our enemies
In Massachusetts not long ago, I found myself driving behind a car with "Free Tibet," "Save Darfur," and "Obama 08" bumper stickers. I wonder if it will ever dawn on the owner of that car that at least one of those stickers doesn't belong.
Does Obama Believe in Human Rights? - WSJ
Liberals... Defenders of freedom and liberty all over the world! One bumper sticker at a time.
Obama and liberals are cowards. Plain and simple.
I've been writing about this:
obama's america: no longer a shining city…
Obama abandons fredom loving people everywhere!
Sphere: Related Contentread more
Fallacy of attempting to “Win The Hearts and Minds”
Stratfor has a new Weekly Intelligence Report George Friedman and Reva Bhalla out titled "The U.S. Challenge in Afghanistan" which I embedded an iPaper version at the end of this post.
It is a thoughtful analysis of where we are in Iraq and Afghanistan wars but it is pushing the fallacy of "winning the hearts & minds" of people who we are trying to save.
The idea that we must win the hearts of minds of people who live in Iraq and Afghanistan or any other place we fight our external enemies is foisted upon us by our internal enemies.
I want you to think about it and try to answer the following questions:
Did Saddam Hussein win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people? He had total control of the Iraqi population. Did he maintain the kind of control he had over Iraqis by love, understanding and care?
We all know how ruthless Taliban was. Did Taliban have the "hearts and minds" of the Afghan people on their side?
Let's look at Iran. Islamist Republic is ruled by mullahs with an iron fist. We observed during the latest election that they sure don't have the "hearts and minds" of all the Iranians on their side. Do you think the mullahs are working hard to win the "hearts and minds" of the Iranians who are not happy with the regime? Does our administration care?
Let's turn back to Afghanistan Today? We are demanding that our troops should win the "hearts and minds" of the Afghans even if it means putting our troops in unnecessary danger. Now, if winning in Afghanistan is depended on winning the "hearts and minds" of Afghans, one would think Taliban would also pursue the same strategy of winning the "hearts and minds" of Afghans. Do you see them doing that?
You see, we are being fooled into losing wars by trying to win something uwinnable before winning the actual war.
Folks, there is only one thing that matters when dealing with our enemies and people who may cooperate with or harbor our enemies: POWER. These people already know we are the side with more POWER but they do not believe we have the determination, guts and will to use it. Afghans will side with us instead of Taliban when they realize that we are committed to defeat Taliban and we are not afraid to use our superior POWER to its full extent. We can't make these people love us right off the bat. First we need to demonstrate to them that we are determined to WIN the war by using everything we have in our arsenal even if it means killing Afghans who refuse to take side with us. We need to make them FEAR us first. That's all there is to it.
We need to ignore the liberals' gasps when we declare this is what we'll do because those gasps are fake!
You see folks, it is fairly obvious now that the liberal democRATs have no problem with tyrannies that oppress their own people. They even celebrate the leftist tyrants and work to prop them up and support them. Yes, liberal democRATS support tyrannies that declare the U.S. as their enemy. The only tyrants the liberal democRATs hate are the ones that are friendly to the U.S. Think about that for minute. They are making hay out of election problems in Afghanistan. Who will take over if we pull out because we are supposedly disgusted by the way these people ran their election? Will Taliban hold elections?
Folks, it is sad to see that even our own military is falling prey to this stupid fallacy of attempting to "Win The Hearts and Minds" of people before we fight and defeat our sworn enemies.
I have a proposal for the liberals:
Why don't we pull out all our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan completely and stick "FREE IRAQ" and "FREE AFGHANISTAN" stickers on the bumpers of our Humvees and tanks while the people of Iraq and Afghanistan being oppressed, murdered in mass scale by the tyrants who take over. Hey, we tried to win their "hearts and minds"! They just didn't get it...
Sphere: Related Contentread more
Do we have a bogus POTUS?
Really folks, who is Barack Hussein Obama?
We have a guy who is holding the highest office in the land and we know nothing about him. We have the phony media and the phony journalists to thank for this.
Listen to this:
What most people know is that the Associated Press (AP) is one of the largest, internationally recognized, syndicated news services. What most people don’t know that is in 2004, the AP was a “birther” news organization.
How so? Because in a syndicated report, published Sunday, June 27, 2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, and which was, as of this report, available at
http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm
The AP reporter stated the following:
Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.
Wait a minute- Obama is “Kenyan-born”?
So back in 2004, the AP knew that Obama was either Kenyan-born or he was actively promoting himself to be Kenyan-born to get elected to the senate. How is it that they are making fun of people who are asking legitimately whether or not we have a "bogus president" Today?
The difficulty in finding this gem of a story is hampered by Google, which is running flak for Obama: because if you search for “Kenyan-born US Senate” you wont find it, but if you search for the phrase without quotes you will find links which talk about it.
I've always thought Google is a monopoly when it comes to web search. The company whose motto is "Do no evil" seems to be not living up to its motto.
A Chronology of Deceit
One can now ask an important question which has not yet been emphasized enough: “Just when did Obama begin to publically claim he was born in Hawaii?” This question is distinct from the question, “Just where in fact was Obama born?”, and from the other question, “What do official documents say about where he was born?”
So we have a bogus POTUS who is an expert in deceiving voters...
Remember how his middle name "Hussein" was off-limits during the campaign and now celebrated for the appeal it has for muslims around the world.
Remember how we were not allowed to ask whether or not Obama is a muslim and how he declared the U.S. to be the largest muslim country after the election.
Remember how he was celebrated as a "constitutional scholar" and even Helen Thomas believed it just to be corrected by Robert Gibbs when questioned.
The journalism in this country is dead. We have partisan propagandists who pass themselves as legitimate journalists.
Sphere: Related Contentread more
What Anita Dunn Likes most about Mao
I see this clip and I understand Glenn Beck's point. Obama's Communications Advisor Anita Dunn's favorite "political philosopher" is Mao Zedong... A communist who is responsible of killing 70,000,000 people but I believe Mr. Beck missed the crucial point by focusing only on her declaration that Mao is one of her favorite political philosophers.
Obamabots are already making fun of Mr. Beck and Anita Dunn herself is trying to direct the focus on Mao quote ""You fight your war and I'll fight mine." by claiming that her source was actually a Republican operative.
Michelle Malkin also has background information on Anita Dunn: Anita Dunn: A corruptocrat flack and a Mao cheerleader. Again the focus is on her general affection for Mao.
Now, here is what we should be focusing on: Listen to what Anita Dunn is saying folks. I hope you caught it the first time you watched the video.
"In 1947, when Mao Zetung was being challenged within his own party on his plan to basically take China over..."
She specifically picked that line. Can you see how it is relevant to Today's America?
We have Obama, Chairman Obama, who is executing his plan to take the U.S. over...
Now you know where they get their inspirations from...
The answer to the question "What does Anita Dunn like most about Mao?" is "EVERYTHING". Yes, everything including his purge of seventy million people. These 70,000,000 were just not willing to be re-educated.
Don't you think Obama has a plan for us dumb folk, who are not willing to be re-educated in his SERVE.GOV camps?
Let's see what his close friend Ayers had planned:
We are all Maoists now!
UPDATE:
Sphere: Related Contentread more
 No Bama Donkey Head In Ass Short Sleve T shirt $19.95 Time Remaining: 1h 51m |
 No Bama Donkey Head In Ass Short Sleve T shirt $16.96 Time Remaining: 1h 51m |