This is uncanny... Right after my post about the absolute uselessness of trying to understand liberal democRATs, a Pakistani muslim tried to detonate a car bomb in the heart of New York City.

Watching liberal democRATs' reaction to this terrorist attack has been fascinating and I've been highlighting some of this on twitter. There is one that deserves a special attention though:

MSNBC host Contessa Brewer appeared on the liberal Stephanie Miller radio show on Tuesday and lamented the fact that the person arrested for the attempted Times Square bombing is a Pakistani American. She complained, "I get frustrated...There was part of me that was hoping this was not going to be anybody with ties to any kind of Islamic country."

Brewer continued, "...There are a lot of people who want to use this terrorist intent to justify writing off people who believe in a certain way or come from certain countries or whose skin color is a certain way. I mean they use it as justification for really outdated bigotry."

Contessa Brewer, brain-dead third rate squealer of liberal democRAT talking points... There is absolutely no way to understand what she means. This is a classic liberal (I almost used a word that would make sarah Palin mad rightfully so because it would have been an insult to those folks.) RAT that is not able to think straight. She is a mess of inarticulate emotions and a desire to satisfy her liberal RAT masters.

She is beneath contempt to hope that the Times Square bomber was someone who has ties to a political movement she hates. Yes, I said "hates". Listen to her: "...There are a lot of people who want to use this terrorist intent to justify writing off people who believe in a certain way or come from certain countries or whose skin color is a certain way. I mean they use it as justification for really outdated bigotry." Contessa Brewer is an enlightened intellectual who is way above of this thing called "really outdated bigotry", you know, hating people beacuse of their skin color, national origin... You see folks, Contessa Brewer, like so many of her comrades, is a "Modern Bigot". Modern bigotry is about hating people because of their political views. Well, since the only modern bigots are liberal democRATs, modern bigotry is hating patriotic Americans who believe in the founding principles of this great country. Modern bigots like Contessa Brewer and her liberal democRAT friends want to smear people they hate with what she calls "really outdated bigotry."

So the question is "Is it possible to explain or, understand what this poor liberal woman saying?" No! We can only feel sorry for this idiot. No wonder Lenin called people like her "Useful Idiots." Now the liberal democRATs became the useful idiots for islamists.

Well, do you really want to know why these people turn into useful idiots for evil regimes, tyrants and terrorists? There can only be two reasons: 1) They are conspiring with the evil regimes, tyrants and terrorists. 2) They are cowards. They just can't face the truth and they hope that they will be spared if they do what they do to cover up for evil regimes, tyrants and terrorists. Either way they are complicit.

You see folks, these useful idiots are much too brave in taking on the Christians, Conservatives, Tea Party movement, etc. but they won't say anything against the religion of peace. Why? Well, because the religion peace followers are the real threat. You see folks, liberals bravely celebrate the free speech right of a moronic so-called artist who pees in a jar and puts Jesus' picture in it but cowardly censor themselves when it comes to simply printing a drawing of mohammad.

It really isn't that hard to figure out folks. Liberal democRATs are gutless cowards and you should never trust them with the defense of your country. These cowards will rather conspire with a dangerous enemy to save their own skin and sell you out in a New York minute.

Well, Obama's hope'n change turned out to be all crap for us but it seems to be working for al qaeda terrorists... They'll get their day in a US court, thanks to Obama's unbelievable foolishness.

The people who planned, coordinated and executed 9/11 terror attacks are not common criminals. They are not American citizens. They don't get to enjoy the protections, rights and privileges we have. They are enemy combatants. They don't even fall under Geneva convention rules because they are unlawful enemy combatants who not only wear a uniform or any insignia but attack civilians. If they are criminals, they are war criminals who should be court-martialed and summarily executed.

Attorney General of the United States called these people "alleged" conspirators for the "alleged' crime. Guess what? We have an "alleged" AG and an "alleged" President. This whole thing is beyond ridiculous. Alleged AG claimed that after talking to his wife and his brother, he came to this decison of trying terrorists in a US court. Shoot, his boss "alleged" President has been talking to all kinds of people about his top General's request for reinforcements to Afghanistan but he can't make his mind up. This is nonsense. It is outrageous that Obama and Holder think we are so stupid that we can't understand what is going on here.

Obama failed to do the number one job of a President -- protect the American people. 14 Americans were killed and dozens were wounded by a terrorist in Fort Hood. Obama denied that the Jihadi Major's attack was a terrorist attack although there is overwhelming evidence that it was. Obama now wants to shut the congressional investigations into the Fort Hood attack.

In Obamaland, Major Jihadi is not a terrorist. In Obamaland, the terrorists who masterminded the 9/11 attacks are not terrorists either. They are "alleged" suspects for "alleged" crimes. Don't you feel like puking all over?

The "alleged" Attorney General of the United States should have consulted more people than his wife and his brother before making the worst decision any one can make. Well, it was the worst decision for us the Americans so probably, Obama & Holder thought it was a good decision for them.

Obama & Holder do not believe we are at war. You see folks, when you are at war, you focus on finding and eliminating the enemy before they harm you. You kill the enemy not because they committed a crime but because who they are. Evidently, Obama and Holder do not think these terrorists are the enemy. They rather wait till their "alleged" criminals commit an "alleged" crime like killing 3000 Americans so that the "alleged" AG can prosecute them. I just can't get around the foolishness of these people. It can't be foolishness. I think it is more than that. I think Holder and Obama are putting petty politics before national security.

Think! We captured these people in ways we do not want to disclose. They were not captured by the cops or FBI. They were not mirandized. We've been holding some of these people for 7 years now. We interrogated these people to extract valuable information from them. Obama calls that torture. These people confessed to being the masterminds of these terrorist acts. Think! If these people do have constitutional rights as any American citizen, then they will demand that their cases should be thrown out of court and the US government pay them millions of dollars for the abuse they were subjected to. Does that make sense to you?

Do you also know the "alleged" AG is not bringing all the detainees into the court system? What is the justification for that? How come some detainees can enjoy the constitutional rights and others cannot? Where is the logic in this?

Andrew McCarthy lays out what will happen during the trial of these "alleged" criminals:

That is, Pres. Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder, experienced litigators, fully realize that in civilian court, the Qaeda quintet can and will demand discovery of mountains of government intelligence. They will demand disclosures about investigative tactics; the methods and sources by which intelligence has been obtained; the witnesses from the intelligence community, the military, and law enforcement who interrogated witnesses, conducted searches, secretly intercepted enemy communications, and employed other investigative techniques. They will attempt to compel testimony from officials who formulated U.S. counterterrorism strategy, in addition to U.S. and foreign intelligence officers. As civilian “defendants,” these war criminals will put Bush-era counterterrorism tactics under the brightest public spotlight in American legal history.

This is exactly what President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder know will happen. And because it is unnecessary to have this civilian trial at all, one must conclude that this is exactly what Obama and Holder want to see happen.

Trial and Terror By Andrew C. McCarthy

Read the whole thing. You'll realize that if Obama & Holder cared about protecting us from future attacks, if they were concerned about defeating the enemy they would reverse this decision immediately.

Well, there is only one way to explain this and it is unfortunate but we have an un-American President who despises our country and the people who foolishly elected him to the highest office of the land. Remember this? "You are either with us or with the terrorists."

The attacks of September 11, 2001, changed the way the world looks at Islam. And rightfully so, according to M.A. Khan, a former Muslim who left the religion after realizing that it is based on forced conversion, imperialism, and slavery: the primary demands of Jihad, commanded by the Islamic God Allah.

In this groundbreaking book, Khan demonstrates that Prophet Muhammad meticulously followed these misguided principles and established the ideal template of Islamic Jihad for his future followers to pursue, and that Muslims have been perpetuating the cardinal principles of Jihad ever since.

Find out the true nature of Islam, particularly its doctrine of Jihad, and what it means to the modern world, and also learn about

The core tenets of Islam and its history
The propagation of Islam by force and other means
Islamic propaganda
Arab-Islamic imperialism
Islamic slavery and slave-trade
And much more!
The commands of Allah are perpetual in nature, so are the actions of Prophet Muhammad. Jihad has been the way to win converts to Islam since its birth fourteen centuries ago, and it won't change anytime soon. Find out why in Islamic Jihad.

Read an Interview with the author of this book: Shaming the Muslims Out of Islam (by Telling the Truth)

Islam is an ideology with a political, economic and legal system that demands an absolute submission to its rules.

Do you wonder why liberal democRATs, leftists, islam apologists, and now the top brass of the US Army beat us on the head demanding diversity and multiculturalism from us but they don't do the same thing when it comes to muslim countries?

United States of America is the most diverse and multicultural country on the face of the world. We have people who come here from all around the world to enjoy the freedoms and opportunities not available in their own countries. People from all kinds of ethnic backgrounds, nationalities, religions been living and prospering together here in the USA for years. There is no country on the face of this earth that is more diverse, that is more welcoming different cultures yet we are the ones being accused by all these so-called elites for not being tolerant of other cultures.

Have you ever heard any of these people complaining about lack of diversity in Russia, in saudi Arabia or in Iran? How come, as AhmediniJihad claimed, there are no gays in Iran? I know, I know, they execute gays there for being gay but where are those "courageous" defenders of civil liberties and diversity protesting that? For years, islamist taliban in Afghanistan enslaved women there and our feminists can't even acknowledge that we, the U.S.A. brought freedom to the women of Afghanistan.

I asked this question before and I will ask again: We already are living in a diverse and multicultural country. Most Americans who are from different cultures are here because they want to be part of this great experience in democracy, freedom and pursuit of happiness. They want to be Americans who contribute and prosper. There is one culture that is here not to be part of America but to subvert, and destroy our culture. This is a culture that is using all the benefits, rights and liberties our democratic system provides to destroy it. Yes folks, the question is what do you do when one culture in a multicultural society is out to destroy all the others? Do you defend and protect or do you submit? It is way past time we make the decision.

The number one thing everyone should realize is that islam is not a religion as we understand religions: It is not about an individual's faith. It is an ideology not much diffrent than national socialism that is pursuing world domination. Islamist ideology is the anti-thesis of democracy and freedom. It is a 7th century ideology that is against every advancement Western Civilization made.

Don't be fooled by calls of diversity, multiculturalism and religious tolerance. These people who are making these calls go back to their mosques and chant "death to America" and believe me when I say they have no tolerance for us. They want us either dead or enslaved. You see folks, there is no such thing as diversity, multiculturalism or religious tolerance in true islam. You either submit to it or you'll get killed.

It has been six years since I wrote "Canadian Idiocy". It can no longer be explained by "idiocy." People who are trying to convince us Fort Hood was not a terror attack and islam is a religion of peace are either muslims who are working to deceive us or they are bought and paid for by muslims because even an "idiot" can see what is obvious.

Do you remember the phrase "connecting the dots"? Liberal democRATs were obsessed with it after 9-11. Our Kenyan-Indonesian-muslim president seems to willfully ignore the evidence in the shooting of American soldiers by a jihadi muslim. One can effectively make the case that the shooting of an American soldier may be a new al-qeada tactic and the shooter was a terrorist not a lone crazy like the other two shooters in other incidents.

Obama’s reactions to recent violent acts

Folks, above paragraph was written not after the Fort Hood islamist terror attack. It was written back in June after another homegrown islamists terrorist, Carlos Bledsoe, killed an American soldier and wounded another.

This is what I had posted also:

Sure, it was just an isolated incident. What is this muslim's full name? "Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad". Guess what "Mujahid" means? It means "one who is waging jihad". No, no, no it is not the peaceful, internal struggle as islam apologists claim. It is the fight against the infidel. That's what jihad is and this "Mujahid" is a foot soldier of islam's war against the people who do not submit to islam. We have jihad being waged right here and our government officials kidding themselves with this BS. How many more Americans need to be killed by "mujahids" before we get serious about this threat folks?

Jihadis are killing our soldiers here in our own country

The propaganda arm of democRAT party, now state controlled media and Obama administration doing everything to make us believe that Fort Hood attack was another isolated incident of violance by a nut case.

Folks, a cursory read of the facts, attacker's background, information about his beliefs and his history proves absolutely beyond doubt that this man was inspired by his radical islamist beliefs to shoot American soldiers. the guy had a business card declaring that he was a "soldier of allah". He was openly anti American. He was'n even shy about what he believes, thinks and hopes to happen to Americans.

It is totally inexplicable that Barack Hussein Obama cannot figure out what Major Jihadi Hassan's motive was. It is totally inexplicable that propaganda arm of the democRAT party, main stream media, are trying to find excuses for a man who killed 14 people and wounded 29 others.

These are the same people who cried that we failed to "connect the dots" to prevent 9/11 attacks. Don't get me wrong, these same people, even after 9/11/2001, blamed us for the attacks and tried to find excuses for the muslim attackers even then but they were incensed that we failed to connect the dots. Folks we had direct lines right in front of our military and FBI about the Fort Hood islamist terrorist.

The dots were already connected.

Why did the Obama administration fail to protect Americans? The number one job of the President of The United States is to Protect and Defend the American people. Having been failed miserably in preventing the biggest terror attack in US soil, Obama administration is now pretending this was not a terror attack. The Obama's homeland security department wants to protect muslims after a muslim slaughtered 14 Americans. Since 1970s 3,308+ killed by Muslims in America in 65 terror attacks. Obama & Napolitano are worried about safety of the muslims. Obama's top commander in the Army is worried about diversity and actually said this: “As horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” This guy should have been fired on the spot.

I asked this question before: If you are a multiculturalist celebrating diversity and you find out the aim of one culture you celebrate is to destroy you and your culture; what do you do? We know what rational people do: Defend and protect themselves by any means possible. We also are learning that Obama and the people in his administration are either delusional or they are the agents of this other culture that wnats to destroy us. I am sorry but there is no way to explain this ant other way in light of overwhelming evidence we have.

Of course, not all my conversations in immigrant communities follow this easy pattern. In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example, have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging. They have been reminded that the history of immigration in this country has a dark underbelly; they need specific assurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.

Simply restated as "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."

Barack Obama, from his book "The Audacity of Hope"

We all know what happened at Fort Hood. A muslim army major with radical islamic views, beliefs and background started shooting US soldiers while yelling "allahu akbar" which is known as muslim terrorists' battle cry. He killed 13 Americans and wounded many others.

Barack Hussein Obama, who called a white cop "stupid" for arresting his black professor buddy without feeling the need to get more details told us not to jump to conclusions about Fort Hood attack. He did not condemn the attack, he was "frighteningly insensitive" to the victims of the attack. He preferred to stay in DC and play politics trying to pass government care with Pelosi instead of visiting the families of the victims.

Here is the latest from barack Hussein Obama:

President Obama says "we cannot fully know" what led Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan to kill 13 people and wound 38 others at Fort Hood, Texas Thursday.

Hasan reportedly shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before the killings, wrote Internet postings justifying Muslim suicide bombings, considered U.S. forces the enemy, and opposed American involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan as wars on Islam. His rampage at Ft. Hood has the markings of an act of Islamic terrorism.

But in his weekly address, Obama says, "We cannot fully know what leads a man to do such a thing." And while the killings were "heartbreaking" and "despicable" and "devastating," the president says, it is important to remember not only that Hasan's fellow soldiers responded bravely in coming to the aid of the wounded but also that "Americans of every race, faith and station" have served in the U.S. armed forces. "They are Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus and nonbelievers," Obama says. "They reflect the diversity that makes this America."

Obama: 'We cannot fully know' motive of Ft. Hood shooter; in address on killings, president celebrates diversity of armed forces by Byron York - Washington Examiner

Now we know why he did not want us to jump to conclusions: He wanted to get CAIR's stand so he can spread their propaganda.

I am speechless. This was a terror attack on our soil and it happened on Obama's watch. 13 Americans killed. Even if you were arrived from Mars yesterday, with just a cursory reading of the news, even with the spin the phony jouranlists are putting, you will be able to figure out why Malik Hasan did what he did. You cannot be that stupid to claim "We cannot fully know what leads a man to do such a thing." You must be covering up especially when you know the history of islamist terrorism. Do we not know what lead muslims to fly planes to World Trade Center in 2001? Do we not know what motivated them to attack USS Cole? Do we not know what motivated the recently arrested muslim in Dallas to use his cell phone thinking it will detonate a car bomb and kill Americans? Do we really not know why this muslim major was dressed in all white -- ready to become a martyr -- in the morning of the attack?

Come on Mr. Bogus POTUS, I understand your promise to stand with the muslims but why would you insist on keeping that promise even when they kill US soldiers? You have not kept many of your other promises after all.

You can also ask other muslims if they know why this muslim attacked American soldiers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rgLx9aMzRU

They have a better idea than Barack Hussein Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama wants us to celebrate diversity. Phony journalists who are fearless to target so called "right-wing extremists" are wishing this guy wasn't muslim. They want us to believe that this was one of those violent acts by a nutcase who just happened to be muslim. They want us to believe an Army Major who has never seen action had post--traumatic stress disorder. As Michelle Malkin states we have to read British papers to get Ft. Hood jihadist news. I understand phony journalists' cowardice, but I have a hard time understanding why a President of the United States would be afraid of muslim terrorists... If it is not cowardice on his part to see and state the obvious then what is it? 13 Americans killed, many more wounded by a guy with a history of radical islamism who yelled the muslim terrorist battle cry while shooting Americans. Some saw warning signs ahead of US Army shooting but said nothing for fear of seeming bigoted. Yep, they were silenced by the politically correct speech. They celebrated diversity as Obama instructs us to do now. How many more Americans need to be killed before we celebrate diversity and multiculturalism?

Really folks. think about it for a minute... You are a multiculturalist who is celebrating diversity and you find out one of the cultures you are celebrating wants to eliminate you and your culture... What do you do? Do you keep celebrating or take steps to defend and preserve your culture and yourself? How can we can celebrate a backward 6th century culture and ideology that demands an absolute submission and conformity to its rules? Are we out of our minds?

Basic common sense tells me, in light of the history of islamist terrorism, this attacker's background, known beliefs and views, eyewitness accounts of the attack, this was an act of terror. It may be a one man act, but it still is an act of terror. Remember mujahid Carlos Bledsoe? What happened to that invetigation by the way?

Common sense also tells me that there is something terribly wrong with a Commander in Chief who willfully ignores an obvious threat and asks everyone to look the other way.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0hiw8iXdMM

After watching Obama's "frightening insensitivity" as NBC Chicago puts it, I am surprised that some people are surprised by his insensitivity.

You see NBC Chicago asks " Who is advising him?" Forget the fact that a Commander in Chief needs no advice when responding to an apparent act of terror on US Soldiers; whoever advising him also shares his disconnect and insensitivity.

If this was a school or workplace shooting that didn't involve a muslim shooting our soldiers, you would have seen him more sensitive to the victims. If this was a story about a white cop arresting an unruly black professor, Obama would have had no need to wait to get the details of what happened. He would have denounced the vile act and called the cop "stupid".

I am not making these things up. Similar things happened. See here:

Obama’s reactions to recent violent acts - June 11, 2009

Why do you think his reaction is so different when it involves a muslim waging jihad against us?

As far as his sensitivity concerned, may I remind you this:

Obama Throws Rose At Ground Zero - September 11, 2008

Seems like the video is disappeared from YouTube. I'll see if I can find another copy.

When I posted this video, someone commented about how irrelevant was this especially with all the "serious" stuff going around the world. I am re-posting my response here. You be the judge of how right I was:

Beware when liberals cry that we should stick with the issues and problems we face and ignore everything else. They did this when clinton abused his power and took advantage of a young intern in the white house. Why didn’t clinton deal with the issues instead of chasing skirt? He might have killed or captured Osama way before 2001 if he had done so. Now I will be accused of bringing clinton into this so let’s deal with the argument here:

1. It is not the issues but what the candidates’ proposals to solve these issues are. We already know that the GOP prefers market based solutions respectful of individual rights and freedoms. We also know that the democrats prefer government based solutions that take away individual rights and freedoms. Since no one in their own mind will vote for tyranny, democrats pretend to have moved to center in every election cycle. in the last congressional elections they ran on conservative issues only to change after elections. Obama makes different promises to sprout eatin’ liberals and gun clingin’ Americans. I wonder which promise he will keep when he gets elected?

2. The presidency is not a job that involves well-defined tasks and descriptions. The president may face issues we may have never dreamed of. It is not only what they promise to do about current issues but how they may behave when they face with an unexpected event and uncertain future. That’s why the character matters. That’s why the past experience and the wisdom gained from it matters. That’s why who they associated in past matters because they will need to bring in and work with people to solve those issues. If they have showed bad judgment picking friends and associates in the past they surely will do the same thing in the future. That’s why the little things like how a person behaves at a memorial service matter because it reveals their character, their wisdom and judgment. It tells us who this person really is. It is invaluable information especially when we just can not trust what that person is saying.

This is exactly why liberal democRATs do not want us to talk about the character, wisdom, honor, judgment of their candidates folks. They have none. All they have is empty promises that will be broken as soon as the election over.