Hope’n Change Crap for Al Qaeda Terrorists

Well, Obama's hope'n change turned out to be all crap for us but it seems to be working for al qaeda terrorists... They'll get their day in a US court, thanks to Obama's unbelievable foolishness.

The people who planned, coordinated and executed 9/11 terror attacks are not common criminals. They are not American citizens. They don't get to enjoy the protections, rights and privileges we have. They are enemy combatants. They don't even fall under Geneva convention rules because they are unlawful enemy combatants who not only wear a uniform or any insignia but attack civilians. If they are criminals, they are war criminals who should be court-martialed and summarily executed.

Attorney General of the United States called these people "alleged" conspirators for the "alleged' crime. Guess what? We have an "alleged" AG and an "alleged" President. This whole thing is beyond ridiculous. Alleged AG claimed that after talking to his wife and his brother, he came to this decison of trying terrorists in a US court. Shoot, his boss "alleged" President has been talking to all kinds of people about his top General's request for reinforcements to Afghanistan but he can't make his mind up. This is nonsense. It is outrageous that Obama and Holder think we are so stupid that we can't understand what is going on here.

Obama failed to do the number one job of a President -- protect the American people. 14 Americans were killed and dozens were wounded by a terrorist in Fort Hood. Obama denied that the Jihadi Major's attack was a terrorist attack although there is overwhelming evidence that it was. Obama now wants to shut the congressional investigations into the Fort Hood attack.

In Obamaland, Major Jihadi is not a terrorist. In Obamaland, the terrorists who masterminded the 9/11 attacks are not terrorists either. They are "alleged" suspects for "alleged" crimes. Don't you feel like puking all over?

The "alleged" Attorney General of the United States should have consulted more people than his wife and his brother before making the worst decision any one can make. Well, it was the worst decision for us the Americans so probably, Obama & Holder thought it was a good decision for them.

Obama & Holder do not believe we are at war. You see folks, when you are at war, you focus on finding and eliminating the enemy before they harm you. You kill the enemy not because they committed a crime but because who they are. Evidently, Obama and Holder do not think these terrorists are the enemy. They rather wait till their "alleged" criminals commit an "alleged" crime like killing 3000 Americans so that the "alleged" AG can prosecute them. I just can't get around the foolishness of these people. It can't be foolishness. I think it is more than that. I think Holder and Obama are putting petty politics before national security.

Think! We captured these people in ways we do not want to disclose. They were not captured by the cops or FBI. They were not mirandized. We've been holding some of these people for 7 years now. We interrogated these people to extract valuable information from them. Obama calls that torture. These people confessed to being the masterminds of these terrorist acts. Think! If these people do have constitutional rights as any American citizen, then they will demand that their cases should be thrown out of court and the US government pay them millions of dollars for the abuse they were subjected to. Does that make sense to you?

Do you also know the "alleged" AG is not bringing all the detainees into the court system? What is the justification for that? How come some detainees can enjoy the constitutional rights and others cannot? Where is the logic in this?

Andrew McCarthy lays out what will happen during the trial of these "alleged" criminals:

That is, Pres. Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder, experienced litigators, fully realize that in civilian court, the Qaeda quintet can and will demand discovery of mountains of government intelligence. They will demand disclosures about investigative tactics; the methods and sources by which intelligence has been obtained; the witnesses from the intelligence community, the military, and law enforcement who interrogated witnesses, conducted searches, secretly intercepted enemy communications, and employed other investigative techniques. They will attempt to compel testimony from officials who formulated U.S. counterterrorism strategy, in addition to U.S. and foreign intelligence officers. As civilian “defendants,” these war criminals will put Bush-era counterterrorism tactics under the brightest public spotlight in American legal history.

This is exactly what President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder know will happen. And because it is unnecessary to have this civilian trial at all, one must conclude that this is exactly what Obama and Holder want to see happen.

Trial and Terror By Andrew C. McCarthy

Read the whole thing. You'll realize that if Obama & Holder cared about protecting us from future attacks, if they were concerned about defeating the enemy they would reverse this decision immediately.

Well, there is only one way to explain this and it is unfortunate but we have an un-American President who despises our country and the people who foolishly elected him to the highest office of the land. Remember this? "You are either with us or with the terrorists."