First of all a courtesy notice to coward liberals: No, using the word "orgasm" and 'koran" in the same sentence is not provocative and it will not incite muslim violence. Islam is a religion that wants to control the minutiae of a muslim's life. I am sure that is one of the reasons why you liberals like islam so much. Anyways, each and every day muslim religious scholars issue decisions about female masturbation to menstruation and anything in between. So there's nothing to worry. By the way, for those who are curious: Female masturbation is not allowed in islam.
Back to the subject at hand: The propagandist media went into a frenzy about an obscure pastor's idea of burning korans on 9/11. It has become the biggest news item. They all cover it the same way by condemning the pastor and issuing warnings to us about the incitement it will generate in the muslim world and the violence that will follow.
It is such a mindless coverage that it became comical.
Well, there are thousands of imams who advocate death to infidel in their mosques. Just recently a prominent not an obscure, muslim cleric called for beheading of Geert Wilders. Nobody in the media who are in a frenzy over an obscure pastor's call for burning a koran seemed to care. I guess it is either OK for muslim clerics to advocate murder or burning a koran is a much bigger crime than murdering a Dutch politician. Well yes, according to the islamic law burning a koran is a bigger crime than killing an infidel. Glad to see that the propagandist media agree with the islamic law.
Let me ask you this: How do you think the propagandist media will react if a muslim cleric or a bunch of imams called for this obscure pastor's beheading in response to koran burning? They pretty much told us to expect violence and they would not only excuse but justify it. Who can blame them? Muslims have reasons to be angry with us you know...
That gets me to my second point: We are incessantly being asked to be sensitive and tolerant to muslims' feelings and their religion. We are being told that we should be careful about what we say and what we do and try not to get muslim street angry with us. Liberals keep asking the question: "Why do they hate us?" over and over again and coming up with a variety of reasons. No matter what our liberal masters do, muslims' hatred for us seems to be increasing. You know why? Forget all the reasons liberal idiots are giving you for the muslim hatred. The true muslims, some in the media call them radical muslims although our Attorney General won't use that term, hate us for being who we are no for what we do. So how do you suppose we deal with that fact you liberal idiots. Sure, let's all drop our own beliefs and convert to islam for the sake of peace. After all islam the religion of peace envisions a peace where there are no unbelievers left. Submit or get exterminated by islam for the sake of global peace. That will surely make our liberal masters happy. Just a few things to ponder though: There will not be any gays in a world ruled by peaceful islam as confirmed by the president of islamic republic of iran. There will not be room for feminism and abortion. Well, I am not sure about abortion since muslims have no problem aborting infidels years after they were born. I am sure a muslim cleric will issue a fatwa about that. before I forget, there won't be any freedom of speech, freedom of religion either when the peaceful islam rules the world. I am sure that there is a big portion of liberals who think that this is a small price to pay to achieve global peace.
The bottom-line is and has always been NEVER TRUST LIBERALS with YOUR LIFE & LIBERTY! They will sell your life and freedoms out in a New York minute.
The decision to post an interview with Kagan conducted by a government employee - not a journalist - is in line with the Obama administration's policy of regularly using new media tools to go around traditional media.
Doing so allows the administration to better control its message - and, in this case, avoid any uncomfortable questions for their Supreme Court nominee.
Still, it's worth noting that it seems to be unprecedented for the nominee to be heard from at all before the confirmation hearings, other than in the initial introduction and in brief photo ops with senators.
"This White House has taken its use of the web to a new level with this move," said CBS News White House correspondent Peter Maer. "The ultimate unfiltered message. Kagan 'in her own words' without anyone else's words."
Elena Kagan White House "Interview" Riles Reporters - CBS NEWS Political Hotsheet
Wow! The Phony Media, The Squealers of The Obama Regime, The Volunteer Propaganda Arm of the Obama Regime and The democRAT Party is no longer trusted by the Obama Regime? Dear Leader Barack Hussein Obama is not happy with the work his squealers in the media producing so he decided to nationalize the propaganda history.
US President Barack Obama lamented Sunday that in the iPad and Xbox era, information had become a diversion that was imposing new strains on democracy, in his latest critique of modern media.
Our Dear Leader Barack Hussein Obama who declared a little or a lot of distribution wealth is good for everyone is not too happy with distribution of information.
Have you noticed his squealers in the so-called mainstream media didn't even question his comments. They knew what information their dear leader was referring to. They knew they were safe as long as they keep spreading the regime propaganda.
Now they are riled because their leader is using government employees to produce his propaganda work. I thought these squealers were for government takeover of everything...
Don't be surprised to see some of these supposedly upset so-called journalists happily churning out regime propaganda with the hopes of getting hired by the regime and becoming a federal employee with full benefits. Long Live Dear Leader!
Rachel Maddow's MSNBC special on Timothy McVeigh this past Monday night did not come a moment too soon. As Maddow explained in the introduction to her show: "Nine years after his execution, we are left worrying that Timothy McVeigh's voice from the grave echoes in the new rising tide of American anti-government extremism."
After months of hysterically warning viewers that cheerful, well-dressed tea partiers carrying "I Can See November From My House" signs could suddenly erupt into wanton violence, MSNBC finally had proof: Timothy McVeigh.
Maddow's interview with Napolitano made me want to hurl on the TV set. Her program is an outright propaganda tool for the Obama regime.
This is exactly the way the Republicans should deal with brain-dead phony media members.
Do not answer their questions that are based on liberal democRAT horseshit. Question their assumptions. Expose their dishonesty and propaganda. make fun of their sheer idiocy. Only the idiots like these two would repeat stupid liberal propaganda mindlessly.
Kudos to Senator Gregg!
Really folks, who is Barack Hussein Obama?
We have a guy who is holding the highest office in the land and we know nothing about him. We have the phony media and the phony journalists to thank for this.
Listen to this:
What most people know is that the Associated Press (AP) is one of the largest, internationally recognized, syndicated news services. What most people don’t know that is in 2004, the AP was a “birther” news organization.
How so? Because in a syndicated report, published Sunday, June 27, 2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, and which was, as of this report, available at
The AP reporter stated the following:
Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.
So back in 2004, the AP knew that Obama was either Kenyan-born or he was actively promoting himself to be Kenyan-born to get elected to the senate. How is it that they are making fun of people who are asking legitimately whether or not we have a "bogus president" Today?
The difficulty in finding this gem of a story is hampered by Google, which is running flak for Obama: because if you search for “Kenyan-born US Senate” you wont find it, but if you search for the phrase without quotes you will find links which talk about it.
I've always thought Google is a monopoly when it comes to web search. The company whose motto is "Do no evil" seems to be not living up to its motto.
A Chronology of Deceit
One can now ask an important question which has not yet been emphasized enough: “Just when did Obama begin to publically claim he was born in Hawaii?” This question is distinct from the question, “Just where in fact was Obama born?”, and from the other question, “What do official documents say about where he was born?”
So we have a bogus POTUS who is an expert in deceiving voters...
Remember how his middle name "Hussein" was off-limits during the campaign and now celebrated for the appeal it has for muslims around the world.
Remember how we were not allowed to ask whether or not Obama is a muslim and how he declared the U.S. to be the largest muslim country after the election.
Remember how he was celebrated as a "constitutional scholar" and even Helen Thomas believed it just to be corrected by Robert Gibbs when questioned.
The journalism in this country is dead. We have partisan propagandists who pass themselves as legitimate journalists.
There was never a single moment when White House staff decided the major media outlets were falling down on the job. There were instead several such moments.
Calling 'Em Out: The White House Takes on the Press By Michael Scherer
Wow! I am speechless... the major media outlets have been falling down on the job? What job? The job of propagandizing for the dear leader Obama? They are doing a marvelous job of it.
This is surreal folks. It is 1984... It definitely is.
Barack Hussein Obama is attacking the major media outlets? The same media outlets that did not bother to ask questions about his inexperience. The same media that admitted not knowing anything about Barack Hussein obama but refused to do any investigative work. The same media that ignore many questions about his background, his education, his friends and connections. The same media that are tirelessly producing polls to show Barack Hussein Obama and his agenda are supported by the American people. The same media that are cheering the "good" economic news that we have less people applying for unemployment every month while more than half a million Americans are losing their jobs each and every month. The same media that are writing ridiculous stories about the benefits of economic meltdown. The same media that are trying to make everything their dear leader does look good. The same media that volunteer to be the vicious attack dogs for Barack Hussein Obama, even when the target is the general who is in charge of the war in Afghanistan. On and on and on.
Didn't the dear leader Barack Hussein Obama watch the coverage of his and his wife's olympic bid? Phony journalist women were having orgasms live talking about how he and his wife wowed the IOC. They were so confident that the messiah was going to deliver the olympics to his hometown to make his cronies rich, they were shocked and stunned to hear the actual result. The idiot CNN anchor could not believe what he was hearing. He kept saying "but, but...". Yeah, the messiah failed and he was stunned. These idiots are so invested in their idiot leader that they threw common sense and critical thinking out the window. How else can you explain their praise of Michelle Obama's lame me, me me speech?
Now the dear leader is calling them out? What the hell you want the media to do Obama? Wipe your ass? Well, they already are doing that.
Well, you know what, we are sick of your whining, narcissism and, insecurity! We have young men and women fighting a war in Afghanistan. You declared that the war in Afghanistan was important and in March you declared your "comprehensive new strategy" after "careful review" and chose a general to fight the war who gave his assessment and his request for additional troops to WIN the war more than a month ago. These men and women who are risking their lives each and everyday are not whining while you are ignoring their request for help. You are ordering your attack dogs to attack the general while whining about the media coverage you are getting. You are a LOSER. We do not want a LOSER as our President. I just can't believe how American people voted for you. I just can't get myself to believe a majority of American people turned into losers like the ones in Detroit who lined up to get "free"money from you.
It is easy to attack your imaginary enemies Mr. Obama. What the hell are you going to do about the real enemies? We are still waiting...
Barack Hussein Obama made a fool of himself. He failed to bring Olympics to his hometown to help his cronies get rich.
Listen to the arrogant phony journalist right before the IOC vote.
Sure, Rock Star Obamas were absolutely magnificient... Thanks to Obamas, Chicago will win!
This is just one example folks.
How could these people be so wrong?
Well, just wait till the elections... Heh heh heh...
On September 4, 2009 at 11:30 AM EDT Byron York posted this:
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the New York Times: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the Washington Post: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on NBC Nightly News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on ABC World News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CBS Evening News: 0.
Keep in mind that the blogosphere was buzzing with Obama's Green Czar's past which led to his resignation.
This guy was one of the biggest leftist kooks we have ever seen and he was in the White House advising the POTUS.
We all know what would happened if Bush had a close adviser with half the kooky past this guy has.
Now let's turn to the reaction of our media icons to this Van Jones story... Tom Brokaw and Thomas Friedman, two media icons, trusted journalists had these to say on Meet The Press:
MR. BROKAW: Well, I've--one of the things I've been saying to audiences is this question comes up a lot, and a lot of people will repeat back to me and take it as face value something that they read on the Internet. And my line to them is you have to vet information. You have to test it the same way you do when you buy an automobile or when you go and buy a new flat-screen television. You read the Consumer Reports, you have an idea of what it's worth and what the lasting value of it is. You have to do the same thing with information because there is so much disinformation out there that it's frightening, frankly, in a free society that depends on information to make informed decisions. And this is across the board, by the way. It's not just one side of the political spectrum or the other. It is across the board, David, and it's something that we all have to address and it requires society and political and cultural leaders to stand up and say, "this is crazy." We just can't function that way.
MR. FRIEDMAN: You know, David, I just want to say one thing to pick up on Tom's point, which is the Internet is an open sewer of untreated, unfiltered information, left, right, center, up, down, and requires that kind of filtering by anyone. And I always felt, you know, when modems first came out, when that was how we got connected to the Internet, that every modem sold in America should actually come with a warning from the surgeon general that would have said, "judgment not included," OK? That you have to upload the old-fashioned way. Church, synagogue, temple, mosque, teachers, schools, you know. And too often now people say, and we've all heard it, "But I read it on the Internet," as if that solves the bar bet, you know? And I'm afraid not.
These are the sad excuses for journalists in our country. Like Rush has been saying, Obama is their Waterloo.
Tom Brokaw advises us to vet information we get from internet because there is so much disinformation out there. Yeah we should trust the investigative news reports like Dan Rather's fabrications about Bush's service in the National Guard. Sure the Holy News Media should be the ultimate arbitrator of what we hear and see. What was to be vetted in the Van Jones scandal Mr. Brokaw? We were able to read, watch and hear what the guy himself had said. It wasn't fabricated documents. You guys making fun of birthers every chance you get but you are silent when it comes to the 9-11 truthers. Why? What part of the information about Van Jones you guys did not report was disinformation? Why did he resign if it all was made-up? Why didn't Obama the Messiah intervened and saved him from all these baseless attacks?
Thomas Friedman calls internet the "open sewer of untreated, unfiltered information". Forget about the fact that this guy works for a newspaper that belongs in the sewer, focus on what they are trying to say: Don't trust the news and information you find on the internet. Trust us the media. These people would be enthusiastic supporters of any regulation or censorship of online blogs. Don't be surprised folks.
Tom Brokaw, respected phony journalist says: "You have to test it the same way you do when you buy an automobile or when you go and buy a new flat-screen television. You read the Consumer Reports, you have an idea of what it's worth and what the lasting value of it is..." Where do most people go to do research before they buy a car or any other big ticket item? Internet of course! Well, it is pretty clear Mr. Brokaw is not concerned about disinformation that exists online about buying a car or a flat-screen television but he'd like to have the political news and views available online either restricted, regulated or at the least mistrusted. Why? Because this dinosaur of the old propagandist media wants to hold the monopoly in news and views dissemination. Tom Brokaw and Thomas Friedman, like many of their colleagues in the phony media, want the power to control what news and views reaches to us dumb folk so we don't get no wrong ideas.
Thanks but no thanks...