NonStopSite.com domain name is for sale:

$75,000.00


Click here to contact SkipD.

Note: SkipD is not the owner of this domain but the editor of the blog.

Owner of the domain name decided to put nonstopsite.com on the shopping block.

It is a GREAT domain name. It is suitable for any dynamic, web 2.0 site. Possibilities are limitless.

NonStopSite Blog is offering an easy way to find 2008 Presidential Election Historical Memorabilia.





"Let the American youth never forget that they possess a noble inheritance, bought by the toils, and sufferings, and blood of their ancestors; and capable, if wisely improved, and faithfully guarded, of transmitting to their latest posterity all the substantial blessings of life, the peaceful enjoyment of liberty, of property, of religion, and of independence. The structure has been erected by architects of consummate skill and fidelity; its foundations are solid; its compartments are beatiful, as well as useful; its arrangements are full of wisdom and order; and its defences are impregnable from without. It has been reared for immortality, if the work of man may justly aspire to such title. It may, nevertheless, perish in an hour, by the folly, or corruption, or negligence of its only keepers, THE PEOPLE. Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people, in order to betray them."



A Familiar Exposition of the Constitution of the United States




Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people, in order to betray them.



Barack Obama will BETRAY you people who fall for his phony HOPE & CHANGE illusion. He will be true to his radical liberal agenda that will limit liberty, freedom, property rights and will -- as he promises -- transform this great nation to a third-world country. Liberal democRATs do not like America we know and we love.


I have been blogging here at NonStopSite.com for over five years.


Back in June 2003, I had this itch about putting up a fight against the lies, misinformation and outright propaganda spread by the communist, socialist, leftist elites in this country. It only takes good old common sense to how brain-dead these so-called smart leftist intellectuals and their ideas are.


Blogging was the way to do it and a friend of mine helped me set this site up using NucleusCMS platform. It has been great but it is time to make a few changes now...


I will be moving the blog under blog directory. It will be powered by WordPress. My old posts will stay where they are since there is no easy way to import them to WordPress, I am told.


What prompted this change is my desire to have others get involved actively in fighting the leftists in this great country. So the BIG NEWS is... that you will be able to participate not only by commenting on posts but by posting articles. Join the fight against propaganda!





Senator Obama: Talk to Commanders or Meet with Dictators?

Vets For Freedom

"Despite recent developments in Iraq, Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) still continues to advocate for immediate withdrawal, still has yet to meet with General Petraeus, and still insists on merely 'considering' a trip. The time for consideration is over. Senator Obama must make a commitment to seeing the success of the counterinsurgency strategy in Iraq himself."


Simple Questions for Hussein the RAT:

Who do you trust more: AhmediJackOFF of Iran or General Petraeus?

Are you offended that we called Ahmedinejad AhmediJackOFF and would you apologize to him for our insensitivity when you meet unconditionally with him?

What if Ahmedinejad has some pre-conditions to meet with you? You know, what if he demand that you should stop letting gays marry and declare that there are no gay Iranians. Would you oblige for the sake of peace?

Back in 2007 you said the surge will not work no matter what. Now it apparently is working, would you re-consider?

Do you want us to win in Iraq?

Would you rather have Iranians have more say in the middle east?

In your commencement speech you never once mentioned volunteering for military as a way to serve this country. Do you believe that well-educated elites like you will not volunteer for military anyway and as John Kerry said uneducated Americans are the only ones who get stuck in military service?



Is it Barack Hussain or Hussein OBAMA? Well according to this article it may even be "Muhammad"!

"Rumor Two: Obama’s middle name is not “Hussein” but “Muhammad.”

As Politifact notes, all available public records going back to 1991 refer to the candidate as “Barack H. Obama.”

It is theoretically possible, if not plausible, that Obama changed his name at some earlier point in his life, as he was sorting out his issues of culture and identity. But this would mean that Obama recognized how emotionally-charged the name “Muhammad” would become in American life long before the 9/11 attacks. And if you’re going to change your middle name from that of the central figure in Islam because you fear controversy, picking the last name of the highest-profile anti-American dictator in the Middle East (Saddam) doesn’t seem like a huge improvement."


Obama Could Debunk Some Rumors By Releasing His Birth Certificate.

What about this: Is it Barry or Barack Hussein Obama?

"Why did Obama make the conscious decision to take on his formal African name? His father was also Barack, and also Barry: he chose the nickname when he came to America from Kenya on a scholarship in 1959. His was a typical immigrant transition. Just as a Dutch woman named Hanneke might become Johanna, or a German named Matthias becomes Matt, the elder Barack wanted to fit in. America was a melting pot, and it was expected then that you melt—or at least smooth some of your more foreign edges."


When Barry Became Barack

So the melting pot is not for Barack?

While writing this post I came across Obama's "certification of live birth." Here is the correct spelling of his name: Barack Hussein Obama II. Now you know...



"Overwhelming majority". Another lie that is being repeated by RATs! If there was an overwhelming majority that opposed the war in iraq, we would not have the war. The RATs would not have passed their resolutions supporting the war. They would have been able to cut off the funding. These WEASELS keep repeating the same lies over and over again. Folks here is the first step to stop these liars: Whenever you hear them make these claims, stop and ask the simplest question that comes to mind: If there was an "overwhelming majority" why then the majority didn't exercise its will? The simplest question is the common sense question that comes to mind in response to a statement like this. Don't get dragged into their rhetoric; demand that they answer the simplest question. This is a very powerful technique you can use anytime a liberal democRAT makes a claim.

As far as the lie and hypocrisy exposed on this video concerned, he is just following the democRAT presidential nominee:

""There is no military solution to this war. No amount of U.S. soldiers – not 10,000 more, not 20,000 more, not the almost 30,000 more that we now know we are sending– can solve the grievances that lay at the heart of someone else's civil war. Our troops cannot serve as their diplomats, and we can no longer referee their civil war. We must begin a phased withdrawal of our forces starting May 1st, with the goal of removing all combat forces by March 30th, 2008."


Barack Hussain OBAMA said that on Wednesday March 21, 2007 On the Senate Floor.

I just can't believe any AMERICAN with self-respect will vote for these LOSERS!!!

Liberal DemocRATs will say and do anything to get elected. They can keep doing that with the help of PHONY MEDIA that covers for them and the TEACHERS' UNION and the liberal academia that work hard to dumb down coming generations, and hollywood propaganda machine that perpetuate the lies.

Here is another video of this liar admitting that the democRATs lied about war in IRAQ:






"Here's a better example of fraud straight from the donkey's mouth that you can bet will never be told on film. It comes courtesy of 12-term Congressman Paul Kanjorski. During a town meeting last August in his Pennsylvania district, Rep. Kanjorski made a remarkable statement about the 2006 election in which Democrats recaptured the majority. Rep. Kanjorski acknowledged that he and his fellow Democrats "sort of stretched the facts" about their intention to end the war in Iraq and bring American troops home."


Politics of fraud
"The headline may seem like a trick question -- even a dangerous one -- to ask during an election year"

Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals? - Examiner.com

So another research into obvious uncovers -- surprise, surprise -- the obvious.

So the liberals think it is OK to cheat on taxes. They would participate in schemes to cheat government of taxes and benefit payments. They would buy goods that they know are stolen. They would shoplift, lie and illegally download music.

"A study in the Journal of Business Ethics involving 392 college students found that stronger beliefs toward “conservatism” translated into “higher levels of ethical values.” And academics concluded in the Journal of Psychology that there was a link between “political liberalism” and “lying in your own self-interest,” based on a study involving 156 adults."


If you have been reading this blog then you know that I tie every liberal idea, policy or scheme to their self-interests. That's why I even proposed that they should be called liberal weasels and the democrat party should change it is icon to a weasel.

"Liberals were more willing to “let others take the blame” for their own ethical lapses, “copy a published article” and pass it off as their own, and were more accepting of “cheating on an exam,” according to still another study in the Journal of Business Ethics."


Anyways, we all know that liberals are liers and cheaters. They are dishonest and untrustworthy. But why?

"The honesty gap is also not a result of “bad people” becoming liberals and “good people” becoming conservatives. In my mind, a more likely explanation is bad ideas. Modern liberalism is infused with idea that truth is relative. Surveys consistently show this. And if truth is relative, it also must follow that honesty is subjective.

Sixties organizer Saul Alinsky, who both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton say inspired and influenced them, once said the effective political advocate “doesn’t have a fixed truth; truth to him is relative and changing, everything to him is relative and changing. He is a political relativist.”

During this political season, honesty is often in short supply. But at least we can improve things by accepting the idea that truth and honesty exist. As the late scholar Sidney Hook put it, “the easiest rationalization for the refusal to seek the truth is the denial that truth exists.”"


Again, why do liberals deny that truth exists. Why do they lie and cheat? It is the ideology that is based on self-interest that does not value anything but self-interest folks. Once you commit to that ideology you will say and do anything. You will justify pretty much anything including mass-murder or genocide. Sounds way over the top? Don't doubt me folks. That's why from time to time I wrote about the similarities liberal democRATs have with communists, tyrannies and even with terrorists. You can never ever TRUST them. Their word doesn't mean anything. Never forget that liberal democRATs will sell you on a heart-beat if it advances their self-serving agenda.
"Search the Internet for""Bush Lied" products, and you will find sites that offer more than a thousand designs. The basic "Bush Lied, People Died" bumper sticker is only the beginning.

Fred Hiatt - 'Bush Lied'? If Only It Were That Simple.

Liberal DemocRAT propaganda creates these stupid slogans for mindless followers to keep repeating.

"But dive into Rockefeller's report, in search of where exactly President Bush lied about what his intelligence agencies were telling him about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein, and you may be surprised by what you find.


On Iraq's nuclear weapons program? The president's statements "were generally substantiated by intelligence community estimates."

On biological weapons, production capability and those infamous mobile laboratories? The president's statements "were substantiated by intelligence information."

On chemical weapons, then? "Substantiated by intelligence information."

On weapons of mass destruction overall (a separate section of the intelligence committee report)? "Generally substantiated by intelligence information." Delivery vehicles such as ballistic missiles? "Generally substantiated by available intelligence." Unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to deliver WMDs? "Generally substantiated by intelligence information."

As you read through the report, you begin to think maybe you've mistakenly picked up the minority dissent. But, no, this is the Rockefeller indictment. So, you think, the smoking gun must appear in the section on Bush's claims about Saddam Hussein's alleged ties to terrorism.

But statements regarding Iraq's support for terrorist groups other than al-Qaeda "were substantiated by intelligence information." Statements that Iraq provided safe haven for Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and other terrorists with ties to al-Qaeda "were substantiated by the intelligence assessments," and statements regarding Iraq's contacts with al-Qaeda "were substantiated by intelligence information." The report is left to complain about "implications" and statements that "left the impression" that those contacts led to substantive Iraqi cooperation."


I love the following paragraph:

"But the phony "Bush lied" story line distracts from the biggest prewar failure: the fact that so much of the intelligence upon which Bush and Rockefeller and everyone else relied turned out to be tragically, catastrophically wrong."


Yes folks, I am talking about the word "phony". It is the phony media that spread these lies for years. It is the phony patriot liberal democrats who fabricate these lies for their own personal political agenda even though these kind of lies make us more vulnerable to more terrorist attacks. As a result of this propaganda democrats produced a presidential nominee who believes these lies.
"Barack says we need to have a conversation about race in America.

Fair enough. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America needs to be heard from, not just lectured to.

This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard. And among them are these:

First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.

Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.

Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the'60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream.

Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks—with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas—to advance black applicants over white applicants.

Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks.

We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude?

Barack talks about new "ladders of opportunity" for blacks.

Let him go to Altoona and Johnstown, and ask the white kids in Catholic schools how many were visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships for "deserving" white kids.

Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates for African-Americans are seven times those of white America? Is it really white America's fault that illegitimacy in the African-American community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent?

Is that the fault of white America or, first and foremost, a failure of the black community itself?

As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially interracial crimes of violence. Is Barack Obama aware that while white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time?

Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first three years of this decade as the reverse?

We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena. And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing.

Sorry, Barack, some of us have heard it all before, about 40 years and 40 trillion tax dollars ago."